Yeah, that totally invalidates the premise that one Admiral can match one Emperor.Because other people are talking like that small unit is the overkill. People are talking about 1 admiral taking out an entire yonko crew with only a handful or no support.
Because the Marines didn't want to engage in an even war. They didn't want to have war with WB at all. Ace's execution was the goal/priority, war with WB was just an unfortunate but inevitable by-product of that, so they got as much of their forces as possible to keep the war as contained and one-sided as possible. And it worked.If that's accurate(which it's not) then Sengoku wouldn't have felt he needed all 3 admirals, himself, Garp and the shichibukai system to help ensure Ace's execution went off without any problems. Sengoku realized how much it would take to defeat a yonko, I don't know why you guys have such a hard time grasping it?
Except this isn't why they stopped.If they knew it took all that to take out 1 Yonko and knew to stand down when a 2nd arrived because they were too depleted to continue without suffering big losses
You're saying two INDIVIDUAL members of an army can't be on the same standing with each other if the two armies aren't also equal? This is a horrible fallacy.then how is it 1=1?
No, it would be a problem because the Emperors balance out with Navy HQ. One or two coming, that's a stomp-mid diff for the Navy. Three is high diff. All four is either way, extreme diff.And what would they do if by some chance the Yonko decided to team up and come at them all 4 at once? I mean if they're equal it shouldn't be a problem but 2 at once made them stand down?