By this logic are we gonna put Aokiji above Dragon, only because we haven't seen literally anything from Dragon, but know how strong Aokiji is. Or what about Big Mom and Blackbeard. We haven't seen Teach since pre timskip, but know how strong Big Mom is. Are we gonna say that BM is stronger than Blackbeard, only because we have no new feats from Teach?
That's great. All this means is that Akainu is superior to sick WB. How does this correlate to him being above Shanks at all?
Baseless and illogical. You can't say that someone is superior to another person just because they haven't played their hand yet.
So you'll take a statement by Oda stating that someone is the strongest creature alive, even knowing that we haven't seen shit from Kaido at all, but you're so quick to dismiss Shanks and put him below Akaiku because we haven't seen anything from him? Is this a contradiction or what?
Also, Since when was Shanks considered a creature? I'm pretty sure creatures are separate from humans.
No, feats from the manga puts Akainu above sick WB, not Shanks.
Even having a moment where he
You must be registered for see links
and then later declared that he would
You must be registered for see links
. He wasn't even phased or worried about Akainu, but sure, believe that just because he hasn't shown what he can do that he is automatically below Akainu.