[Discussion] Mihawk>Shanks?

[24 12 11 to troll]

its not something oda would say because he likes to leave things to thinking. so if he says ch doesnt work in a 1v1 fight then hed ruin it for pepole since they wont think of the theories. otherwise he wouldnt have kept sanjis left eye in the dark until the skip

I'll show it to you, but it'll take a little time, since I have to search for it.

You must be registered for see links

 

[Hexuze]

This is one of the longest discussion I have ever witnessed in the OP section, but everybody is going around in circles with their arguments.

I think I've experienced worse on this section with some girl who thought Luffy will solo. Doffy in Dressrosa. That was like in June/July though. This thread is funny to read though. XD

Edit: Nvm it was 6 pages but it was a heated debate though. She would pretty much call you an idiot/dumbass if you disagreed with her loool.

You must be registered for see links

 

[24 12 11 to troll]

I think I've experienced worse on this section with some girl who thought Luffy will solo. Doffy in Dressrosa. That was like in June/July though. This thread is funny to read though. XD

Edit: Nvm it was 6 pages but it was a heated debate though. She would pretty much call you an idiot/dumbass if you disagreed with her loool.

You must be registered for see links

Vampy always makes the most hilarious remarks...

 

[Hexuze]

Vampy always makes the most hilarious remarks...

Yeah lol. You've debated with her before?

 

[24 12 11 to troll]

Yeah lol. You've debated with her before?

Yep. Before she got banned I had to debate with her as to why Enel is not overpowered anymore...

Why did she call you a pervert? She called me one too...

 

[Hexuze]

Yep. Before she got banned I had to debate with her as to why Enel is not overpowered anymore...

Why did she call you a pervert? She called me one too...

Prob. cause of my avatar. I remember me and some other guys were joking around and calling her a princess/hot (I forgot xd).

 

[LitzSabr]

I think I've experienced worse on this section with some girl who thought Luffy will solo. Doffy in Dressrosa. That was like in June/July though. This thread is funny to read though. XD

Edit: Nvm it was 6 pages but it was a heated debate though. She would pretty much call you an idiot/dumbass if you disagreed with her loool.

You must be registered for see links

Worse than this?
This thread isn't bad . It served it's purpose.

 

[Mephew D Kensei]

well this has been entertaining for sure, but i must say its been grt that u peeps kept the direct insults on the low and let the facts or non-facts do the outclassing.
OT: IMO the Shanks and Mihawk issue is one Oda deliberately made as by hype Yonko are supposed to be the pple at the top of this era, then Mihawk is WSS yet one of the yonko uses a sword for combat so by th@ logic Mihawk shld b > Shanks, but he then goes to make a trusted source WB say Mhwk and Shnks used to battle a lot before by so making them rivals and kinda imply they are or @ one tym were close or equal in power. End of the day i still wanna go with Shanks(slightly)>Mihawk coz of the Yonko status and the clash with WB, and i know Mihawk has some very epic feats i.e Slashing a massive iceberg(casual strike @ that), spliting the Dreadnaught Saber as if with scorching knife thru butter and i really think the difference btwb them is very very small. The question then is why isn't Shanks WSS if he's >Mihawk, to this it comes down to what does Oda mean by swordsman and to me i see the term swordsman(in one piece world) as more a title than a generic term for "sword user".

 

[ziggyZ]

I fail to see how it's relevant for you to feel the need to assert superiority over everyone else.

Mmm, where do I assert superiority? You obviously do when you call people "d*ck riders", Lol.

Three of us. At the time it was only me online. Cocky? Coming from you , good sir.

Mate, out of everyone one to visit this thread, you're defs the cockiest one out. I mean, whenever there's a theory regarding a power or a character, you always post your theory (a link) regarding the same topic and go on to state the OP is 100% wrong and yours is right.

Proven that Shanks is a swordsman. You are simply in a constant state of denial.

Prove Mihawk has Haki and then continue by saying it's fact Shanks is a fully-fledged swordsman - swordsman epitomized.

You can manipulate statements by ignoring key phrases. Like how you completely ignored me saying common practice and training. Which means you couldn't construct a counter argument to my statement , a clear sign that i've found a loophole in your argument.

Neither have I constructed a poor argument, neither have you found a "loophole".

Consistent training is different from picking up a sword twice in your life. I would've thought that someone with so many d*ck riders in this thread would know this. Sadly you clearly aren't as great as the shit debaters say you are if you're incapable of comprehending a differentiation between comedic repetition and consistent usage.

Now now mate, just 'cause no one has critically acclaimed you as being one of the best debaters and most knowledgeable regarding OP doesn't mean you need to go out of your own way to people to a weaker level. It's just appalling & pathetic after-all. And as someone who's debated with you many times, it's afir to say that words of yours are just undoubtedly beneath you my friend. So please man, stop being covered by this shroud of jealousy and/or hate 'cause it's truly clouding your judgement.

Plus, RW definition of a swordsman is someone who fights with sword (so granted, RW-wise, Shanks is a swordsman, period; but same goes for Luffy). However, MW definition of a swordsman is someone who possesses nothing in their arsenal except swordsmanship (so granted, MW-wise, Luffy ain't a swordsman, but neither is Shanks).
And if you say Shanks is a swordsman MW-wise since he hasn't shown any feats such as punchng or kicking, than you cannot say Mihawk has CoA since he's shown no feats of that. So, if you say it's theoretical to assume he has it, then it's theoretical to assume Shanks can fuse CotSK & CoA to execute mild Almighty Push's and of course, expert martial arts prowess. But if you don't accept he isn't a swordsman but a multi-versal combatant, than you can't say Mihawk has CoA. So as for his title: WSS/WGS is exactly what it says: in pure-swordsmanship (since Haki is an add-on just like V-tech is to a car), than he is the strongest swordsman in terms of sword-strength and greatest swordsman in terms skill. Furthermore, if you continue to say Shanks is classified as nothing but a swordsman, than the reason Mihawk is called the WSS/WGS is simply because he wields the WSS/WGS - nothing more, nothing less.

That made no sense. Please reword it.... By creature they are most likely referring to either a Zoan ability or someone whom is not human (e.g. Giant,Fishman or Minkman). Whitebeard is dead ; Kaidou may have attained the title during the time skip. We don't know enough for this fail argument to have any logical relevance to the thread.

The fact that you want me to reword it implies you fail to comprehend my post. And thus you post slander in hopes of me subtracting that argument. But no bro, that won't work on me

Last time I checked it was WSS vs WSSS (worlds second strongest swordsman)

Last time I checked, I explained why he's known that and Shanks isn't (a post to which was never replied, to mind you).

T Bogard has pretty much solo'd the thread by using actual evidence to back up his claims and dispel your low level arguments. good job bro!

OMG. You obviously don't even know what it means to "solo" a thread. So I guess I'll educate you: it means to reply to all posts which were aimed at you and those replies were never replied back to. And last time I checked, Mr. Bogard here bitched it hard to me since he still never replied to any posts of mine which were directed at him in their entirety. And to think, that someone such as yourself, a self-proclaimed genius, would know such a simple definition.

It has been stated that Roger and Whitebeard were rivals so we can get an idea of his strength from Whitebeard's and it's easily above Law. Same in the case of Shanks (can be measure by Mihawk or from that he equalled WB in a clash).

Nope, not acceptable. 'Cause the guy that post was aimed at suggested hype is not used in debate, and what you posted there exhibits hype at it's finest.

Shanks "fighting style" is based around swords.

It's based around one sword and his body as a whole (a la Vergo - first shown to use a bamboo stick as club, later shown to be a multi-versal fighter).

When was the last time we saw Shanks fight without his swords?

When was the last time we saw Mihawk use CoA?

Also it is stated that Mihawk can run fear in his enemies just by looking in their eyes, so he can do that too. Now I guess he isn't a swordsman too, right?

Unlike people on this thread, I don't use Haki as a different fighting-style (unless it's my theory of Almighty Push), I use it as a supplement/extra. So even if he uses CotSK, that doesn't mean he has a different fighting-style.
So please dude, read these words carefully - since they'll also work as future advice; next time you respond to me, bear in mind what I use in my debates, otherwise you'll look like a fool.

Ziggy just got shot down.

If by "shot down" you mean these preceding posts turned into a figurative bullet and was shot at my head though luckily I didn't die but was instead put in a coma, than yes, yes I was "shot down".

GG guys , now for the Ace vs Luffy discussions...

With this term, it's clear to anyone who's beaten you that you're just trying to end this debate, otherwise you'd welcome more & more arguments to illustrate exactly why MIhawk is > Shanks. But you don't, you just act as though this debate is finished - which is obvious not the case (not yet though).

exactly. this one guy on here explained how ch can be fused with ah to make physical force. he also said that shanks could be able to use shockwaves like fishman karate or something like shinra tensai

That's be me mah niggah.

coz he needs dat attention


that ziggy kid perfectly explained why mihawk is the wss and why shanks isnt

Ya, and that's a post which no one had the balls to defeat.

pro mihawk argument

he has a big sword which looks like a dik to me and i love to ride big diks that are really drawings

Hahahahahahaha, too true.

---

Anyways, albeit all this commotion on MIhawk being > Shanks because he is the WSS and Shanks is also a swordsman so thereby MIhawk>Shanks is indeed pretty funny; especially when those guys ask for proof of Shanks having any other fighting-skill, and until shown, he is what you call a swordsman in the manga world. But still, can I ask you all a question? Meh, I cbf caring if you would care for a question or not, so here it is: does Dracule Mihawk, the 'Worlds strongest & greatest swordsman' even have CoA? I mean, 'Power of Destruction' can only take you so far against someone who's Haki is strong enough to break a ship, hence until you all (or any of you for that matter) prove he does - like prove prove - than it's safe to assume the only reason he is knows as the WSS/WGS is 'cause he holds, swings, simply uses the worlds strongest & greatest sword to exist.

---

---

---

---

---

Now then, since that has been cleared, rinnemaki... let's get a little personal shall we. And as a disclaimer, let me warn you that it's advised not for you to read any further (even though it's for you and for you only) as it can possibly be classified as uber-rape.

So, let me start it off with "hypocrite/10?"

Good, that's got the ball rolling.

So you may (or even others may) ask: "What does that mean?" "Why would he say that?"

Well then, do you remember your debate with Love Cook? Hopefully you do. But if ya don't, you can always go back on it. Anyway, back on-topic... but before I get the main point out, for the record, I don't give a shit about insults or anything, since impo, insults are actually ways to get your point across even furthermore, so I accept and even welcome them since it demonstrated just how passionate one is to make their argument/s stand tall over all with an iron fist (so-to-speak ofc). So what i say now can't track back to me 'cause it really doesn't even apply to me.

So then: after LC called you "starfish brain" you responded with a meaningful

Insults is a sign of loss. Because you are expressing minor rage right now as to the fact you cannot move the rock which is in your way known as an argument.

But then, soon enough, you just insulted various debaters on this very thread

Spoiler

Consistent training is different from picking up a sword twice in your life. I would've thought that someone with so many d*ck riders in this thread would know this. Sadly you clearly aren't as great as the shit debaters say you are if you're incapable of comprehending a differentiation between comedic repetition and consistent usage.

(insulting their opinions; their beliefs). And thus, you've contradicted yourself to a hypocritical level.
Awhy would this be personal? Because e one thing I hate most is a hypocrite - especially when it comes to debating with one. So with that being said, I'll bestow you with this ultimatum (you should be honored, since I don't reason with hypocrites but you're an exception because behind that shroud of anger lies a respectable intellect): stop replying to my posts on this thread - so obviously this post - and we can debate anywhere else on any other thread just not this one seeing as you've committed a severe crime (in my books) so therefore I don't have it in me to continue debating with you (in this state) on the very thread you committed the act; OR, you sincerely apologize for you actions and then we continue debating to our hearts content right here - but, this apology must be in the form of that which allows me to here your sincerity .
But until any of those two options are met, if you want to respond, get any of your peers to respond on your behalf (I doubt any of them have the capacity to do so on a solo-ops, so I'll let you guide them into saying what and when).
Now it's true I can't force you to do any of them, and I wouldn't say "for the love of God/Christ/goodness (etc)". But I will say this: If you respect me - may be not as a person, but as a fellow OP-fan and/or debater - or simply for the respect of Oda himself for being the reason behind this discussion - then out of said respect, at least show the courtesy to comply to such a generous wish. I mean, after-all, I'm more comfortable swearing whilst debating but as you are not since I'd appear weak & unstable, I don't. So please have the dignity to take advantage of such a humble proposal.

---

*Opens a deck of Winnie Reds, takes a dart out, lights that shit and smokes it all in one go* "Sign, sealed, delivered." *Throws the butt* "Laiterz."

 

[24 12 11 to troll]

Mmm, where do I assert superiority? You obviously do when you call people "d*ck riders", Lol.

How am I asserting superiority over others when I simply described? You thought you were too good for this forum so you went on Hiatus. Simple really...

Mate,

'Ite?

out of everyone one to visit this thread, you're defs the cockiest one out.

Says the one labelling me as cocky
XD

I mean, whenever there's a theory regarding a power or a character, you always post your theory (a link) regarding the same topic and go on to state the OP is 100% wrong and yours is right.

No... I link to a thread (if I have one) which shows my views without me having to explain in long paragraphs etc. most often because I don't normally have the time... If I disagree with the OP I will explain why. You clearly have the wrong idea.

Prove Mihawk has Haki and then continue by saying it's fact Shanks is a fully-fledged swordsman - swordsman epitomized.

I don't need to prove it. Why? Because someone of Admiral tier is sure to have Haki. (Mihawk is above that tier ; which says something), "prove that Doflamingo can use Busoshoku Haki. If you can't you clearly lose all of the plausibility for your argument..." (Same concept as what you're trying to exert) Because he has never shown it doesn't mean he can't use it. Logically when you power scale it's certain someone who rivals Shanks has it. But I will give you this: Since Zoro was trained under Mihawk in order to grow stronger during the two year time skip... What is the likelihood Mihawk did not teach him how to use Haki?

Neither have I constructed a poor argument, neither have you found a "loophole".

That's just your inadequate opinion

Now now mate,

'Ite?

just 'cause no one has critically acclaimed you as being one of the best debaters and most knowledgeable regarding OP doesn't mean you need to go out of your own way to people to a weaker level.

Thing is I have... similarly to you : the claims came from people incapable of thinking for themselves and simply agreeing with what you said. They made no contribution to the thread as not a single plausible argument was made by them. Besides the fact you boast about what others say about you shows how you enjoy asserting superiority if all else fails.

It's just appalling & pathetic after-all.

Isn't it just? Thinking Shanks is a swordsman? What an idiot I am! It's truly pathetic to disagree with you , right?

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

Well it's the reason why you think he's stronger than Mihawk , because apparently he isn't a Swordsman according to you...

And as someone who's debated with you many times, it's afir to say that words of yours are just undoubtedly beneath you my friend.

How can ones words be beneath themselves? You simply disagree with everything I say because you can't counter my arguments without resorting to a minor witty comment.

So please man, stop being covered by this shroud of jealousy and/or hate 'cause it's truly clouding your judgement.

Yep... totally jealous... of course...
Especially when there's nothing to be jealous of...

Plus, RW definition of a swordsman is someone who fights with sword (so granted, RW-wise, Shanks is a swordsman, period; but same goes for Luffy). However, MW definition of a swordsman is someone who possesses nothing in their arsenal except swordsmanship (so granted, MW-wise, Luffy ain't a swordsman, but neither is Shanks).

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

As you can see I clearly agree with you.

And if you say Shanks is a swordsman MW-wise since he hasn't shown any feats such as punchng or kicking, than you cannot say Mihawk has CoA since he's shown no feats of that.

Called using logic. Zoro has punched and kicked before...

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

So, if you say it's theoretical to assume he has it, then it's theoretical to assume Shanks can fuse CotSK & CoA to execute mild Almighty Push's and of course, expert martial arts prowess.

Prowess in MA's is defined by skill. Not by the strength of Haki.

But if you don't accept he isn't a swordsman but a multi-versal combatant,

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

than you can't say Mihawk has CoA. So as for his title: WSS/WGS is exactly what it says: in pure-swordsmanship (since Haki is an add-on just like V-tech is to a car), than he is the strongest swordsman in terms of sword-strength and greatest swordsman in terms skill. Furthermore, if you continue to say Shanks is classified as nothing but a swordsman, than the reason Mihawk is called the WSS/WGS is simply because he wields the WSS/WGS - nothing more, nothing less.

Haki adds to a persons power. Therefore Mihawk is still superior as being the Strongest Swordsman (the title Mihawk holds) means he is stronger than anyone categorized as a swordsman. Being the Greatest means either the same (depending on how you look at it) or the most skilled. In which Mihawk holds both titles.

The fact that you want me to reword it implies you fail to comprehend my post.

Bad English... The sentence had clauses in the wrong places.

And thus you post slander in hopes of me subtracting that argument. But no bro, that won't work on me

It was just genuinely bad English... The sentence had clauses in the wrong places.

Last time I checked, I explained why he's known that and Shanks isn't (a post to which was never replied, to mind you).

Where's the post? Show me it and I will respond. I may have simply just missed it.

OMG.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You obviously don't even know what it means to "solo" a thread.

It means that you dominate a debate to the point where the opposing side is in a constant state of denial with no new arguments being created or without any responses as they realize the lack of arguments mean you lost. The primary is the state you guys are in right now.

So I guess I'll educate you: it means to reply to all posts which were aimed at you and those replies were never replied back to. And last time I checked, Mr. Bogard here bitched it hard to me since he still never replied to any posts of mine which were directed at him in their entirety.

Because like Bobby Brown your arguments were repeated and unneeded as they were already disproven.

And to think, that someone such as yourself, a self-proclaimed genius,

I do not proclaim to be a genius. It's funny coming from you ; almighty Lord Cocky One.

would know such a simple definition.

I defined it better than you with more specificity.

Nope, not acceptable. 'Cause the guy that post was aimed at suggested hype is not used in debate, and what you posted there exhibits hype at it's finest.

I CBA to look for the post but I am aware. Hype has often treated us badly. Look at Hiruzen the supposed God of Shinobi as an example.

It's based around one sword and his body as a whole (a la Vergo - first shown to use a bamboo stick as club, later shown to be a multi-versal fighter).

Where does he throw a punch or kick? Then I can agree with the statement.

When was the last time we saw Mihawk use CoA?

When was the last time Shanks didn't use a sword to fight a strong human opponent?

Unlike people on this thread, I don't use Haki as a different fighting-style (unless it's my theory of Almighty Push), I use it as a supplement/extra. So even if he uses CotSK, that doesn't mean he has a different fighting-style.
So please dude, read these words carefully - since they'll also work as future advice; next time you respond to me, bear in mind what I use in my debates, otherwise you'll look like a fool.

I'll look like a fool? Says the guy who thinks Shanks isn't a swordsman...

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

If by "shot down" you mean these preceding posts turned into a figurative bullet and was shot at my head though luckily I didn't die but was instead put in a coma, than yes, yes I was "shot down".

Either way it means you lost as you are now incapable of responding. I wish you a quick recovery.

With this term, it's clear to anyone who's beaten you that you're just trying to end this debate,

Because there's no point trying to debate with people in a constant state of denial ; because they're too dense to debate with as they're incapable of changing opinion ; not only this but what their opposition says goes in one ear and out of the other.

otherwise you'd welcome more & more arguments to illustrate exactly why MIhawk is > Shanks. But you don't, you just act as though this debate is finished - which is obvious not the case (not yet though).
That's be me mah niggah.

Well your niggah was pretty stupid... I guess you mix into the same crowd. Correct? And read the prior statement above...

Ya, and that's a post which no one had the balls to defeat.

But I'm defeating an even lengthier wall of of boring text right now...
Which post? Show me and I will respond.

Hahahahahahaha, too true.

FYI I prefer Shanks to Mihawk so not really... for other maybe ; but Mihawk isn't even among my 10 favorites.

Anyways, albeit all this commotion on MIhawk being > Shanks because he is the WSS and Shanks is also a swordsman so thereby MIhawk>Shanks is indeed pretty funny;

Logic:

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

especially when those guys ask for proof of Shanks having any other fighting-skill,

Logic:

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

and until shown, he is what you call a swordsman in the manga world.

Logic:

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

(FYI Zoro has used limbs before...)

But still, can I ask you all a question? Meh, I cbf caring if you would care for a question or not, so here it is: does Dracule Mihawk, the 'Worlds strongest & greatest swordsman' even have CoA?

Logically yes ; if you have no Haki you can't surpass Enel ; a fodder to Mihawk. Pretty simple really... it's called powerscaling.

I mean, 'Power of Destruction' can only take you so far against someone who's Haki is strong enough to break a ship,

Hence he most likely has atleast two prominent forms of Haki. Yes?

hence until you all (or any of you for that matter) prove he does - like prove prove - than it's safe to assume the only reason he is knows as the WSS/WGS is 'cause he holds, swings, simply uses the worlds strongest & greatest sword to exist.

I've never even considered or mentioned Mihawks Yoru have I? Find a statement where I do and then this statement has low level plausibility , until then it's worthless.

Now then, since that has been cleared, rinnemaki... let's get a little personal shall we. And as a disclaimer, let me warn you that it's advised not for you to read any further (even though it's for you and for you only) as it can possibly be classified as uber-rape.

Fast rape? If I enjoy it : it cannot be classified as rape anymore.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

So, let me start it off with "hypocrite/10?"

Let me start with:

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You wanted personal... so...

Good, that's got the ball rolling.
Ziggy is always rolling

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

So you may (or even others may) ask: "What does that mean?" "Why would he say that?"

Why would he say that?

Well then, do you remember your debate with Love Cook? Hopefully you do. But if ya don't, you can always go back on it. Anyway, back on-topic... but before I get the main point out, for the record, I don't give a shit about insults or anything, since impo, insults are actually ways to get your point across even furthermore, so I accept and even welcome them since it demonstrated just how passionate one is to make their argument/s stand tall over all with an iron fist (so-to-speak ofc).

I like the Stalin and Khrushchev reference...

So what i say now can't track back to me 'cause it really doesn't even apply to me.

You're still linked with whatever you're gonna say... Since you you're the one who posts it.

So then: after LC called you "starfish brain" you responded with a meaningful

Please finish the sentence.

But then, soon enough, you just insulted various debaters on this very thread (insulting their opinions; their beliefs).

Disproving doesn't count as an insult.

And thus, you've contradicted yourself to a hypocritical level.

You're quite hypocritical yourself...

was offline for a few days since I was put in a coma due to reading BS in this section

where do I assert superiority?

Implication that you think you're too high up in comparison to everyone else.

why would this be personal? Because e one thing I hate most is a hypocrite

Hate yourself then

- especially when it comes to debating with one.

I know that feel bro... debating with one right now...

So with that being said, I'll bestow you with this ultimatum (you should be honored, since I don't reason with hypocrites but you're an exception because behind that shroud of anger lies a respectable intellect):

Thanks for the complement, but it's clear that my arguments are relevant if you even have to post this...

stop replying to my posts on this thread - so obviously this post - and we can debate anywhere else on any other thread

Why is that?

just not this one seeing as you've committed a severe crime (in my books) so therefore I don't have it in me to continue debating with you (in this state) on the very thread you committed the act;

Because this was the last gasp you could come up with ; knowing that I'd have a good response in return?

OR, you sincerely apologize for you actions and then we continue debating to our hearts content right here

Sorry for being a hypocrite even though that's down to your opinion and if you consider someone a hypocrite you can't really blame anything other than your standards on how you judge hypocriticism

- but, this apology must be in the form of that which allows me to here your sincerity .

I was "very" sincere.

But until any of those two options are met, if you want to respond, get any of your peers to respond on your behalf (I doubt any of them have the capacity to do so on a solo-ops, so I'll let you guide them into saying what and when).

Asserting and implying superiority again...

Now it's true I can't force you to do any of them, and I wouldn't say "for the love of God/Christ/goodness (etc)". But I will say this: If you respect me - may be not as a person, but as a fellow OP-fan and/or debater - or simply for the respect of Oda himself

Oda was never involved in this debate. Until he posts in this debate ; trying to make me feel sorry for Oda whom doesn't even know that this is going on at this very second on a website he can't read , then attempting to make me feel guilty is useless.

for being the reason behind this discussion - then out of said respect,

He isn't the reason for this debate... I believe it was the fact someone posted this thread.

at least show the courtesy to comply to such a generous wish.

How is it generous seeing as it has no gain than to anyone but yourself.

I mean, after-all, I'm more comfortable swearing whilst debating but as you are not since I'd appear weak & unstable, I don't. So please have the dignity to take advantage of such a humble proposal.

Bullshit

I made a funny
xD

*Opens a deck of Winnie Reds, takes a dart out, lights that shit and smokes it all in one go* "Sign, sealed, delivered." *Throws the butt* "Laiterz."

If you don't reply to this message then I solo'd you. Going by your primitive definition

it means to reply to all posts which were aimed at you and those replies were never replied back to.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Kuzan]

I rather have this thread closed... It started of in good fun, but it has turned into a pissing contest between people that think a little to highly of themselves. Come one guys, it is just a manga/anime forum, lets keep it fun. Dont take it too serious.

 

[24 12 11 to troll]

I rather have this thread closed... It started of in good fun, but it has turned into a pissing contest between people that think a little to highly of themselves. Come one guys, it is just a manga/anime forum, lets keep it fun. Dont take it too serious.

Ziggy makes things dull and boring because he takes everything seriously...

You must be registered for see images

It's probably best that the thread is closed down... since Ziggy attempted to make it personal and therefore intends to make it an insult thread...

 

[LitzSabr]

Nope, not acceptable. 'Cause the guy that post was aimed at suggested hype is not used in debate, and what you posted there exhibits hype at it's finest. [/I]

Manga clearly states, WB rivaled Roger's strength. Don't put false arguments.
BTW seeing your other replies, now you have lost it.:eww:

 

[SSS12]

Starting to turn into a flame war. This is supposed to be an opinion, and everyone is entitled to one. I hate it when people start imposing their opinion on to others.

 

[Fujitora]

Mihawk being the greatest swordsman has nothing to do with his...

1. Physical strength
2. Speed
3. Haki
4. Stamina
5. Durability

Everything you mentioned are part of any fighting style. To find out who is the greater swordsman won't be doing circus acts. They will need to fight which is what will determine who is the strongest one.

Nothing in the manga implies Shanks to be anything but a swordsman and the author himself has Mihawk as the strongest swordman and Zoro's ultimate benchmark.

 

[Hexuze]

Winners of the thread: Nebula, Ziggy, Me & Kuzan.

 

[Fujitora]

The losers of this thread owe you folks a cookie.

 

[LitzSabr]

Winners of the thread: Nebula, Ziggy, Me & Kuzan.

I can't believe this. Even after every argument was countered well, someone still thinks this.

Guess that's the internet for you

You must be registered for see images

 

[24 12 11 to troll]

I can't believe this. Even after every argument was countered well, someone still thinks this.

Guess that's the internet for you

You must be registered for see images

Self proclaimed and full of themselves too...
The internet is thriving with people like that...

 

[Kuzan]

Self proclaimed and full of themselves too...
The internet is thriving with people like that...

A discussion does not need a winner... We can learn from eachother without actually changing your opinion.