Step your reading comprehension up.
Again only Barto n maybe that long arm guy started there adventure. Rest haven't if I not wrong.
We see Cavendish doing this as well.
Technically he was destroying MF while Akainu was finding a way to come back to surface n it was BB who killed him.
This refutes nothing I said.
What part of healing u don't understand???
Except he didn't heal since he still had the bleeding wounds.
I was talking about the guy who was shown in recent chapter not BB.
And the relevance of this is?
Yes they are.
It was you who posted the BS 100-98logic. So u agree that Mihawk was weak in comparison to WB???
No? LMAO you have to be trolling with this blatant inability to read.
By answer u mean where u cleverly said WB got the title because his equal died :elmo:
So u consider them equal if I m not wrong. I see WSM title didn't put WB above Roger then hmmm...
Y-Yes? If two people are of equal strength and they're alive at the same time, neither of them would be the WSM...the title wouldn't exist until after one of them died. If WB became PK and died, Roger would be the WSM instead. What exactly do you falsely think this proves?
It's not benefit of doubt. People claims Mihawk is above Shanks n whenever asked to.prove they comes with title logic which doesn't help at all to strengthen the case.
Just because you're incapable of understanding what the title means doesn't mean it doesn't mean what it means.
So which fights we talking about???
I mean we have Shanks who is clashing with WSM, WSC n all the other guys whereas Mihawk was clashing rookies n some low lvl pirates. U think Mihawk showed more firepower n Shanks didn't???
The fact that Mihawk is regarded as the most powerful swordsman even after Shanks does these things just means that these feats can be attributed to Mihawk as well.
Shanks clashing with the WSM just means Mihawk would be capable of the same thing because he's still regarded as more powerful. Same for anything else Shanks does until it's demonstrated that Mihawk's title doesn't apply to Shanks, and that hasn't happened.
-Because Shanks never got one of his attacks blocked by a 3rd division commander like it was nothing?
-Because Shanks never got stalled by a mid tier officer who also wields a sword?
Interestingly enough, Shanks only clashes have been with high tier guys. Go figure.
And on the other hand, Mihawk has demonstrated power on the level of Emperors and Admirals during these same events. Jozu blocking Mihawk's slash can easily be attributed to being similar to Daz Bones blocked a slash like it was nothing and was then cut down by the very next one and couldn't fight anymore. Just because Jozo blocked one doesn't mean he could have blocked a second one right after, nor does it mean Mihawk was going all out.
It's a little interesting how you guys are so quick to accept the title argument, but what exactly can Mihawk do with that title, that Shanks can't stop? If Mihawk charges at Shanks with his black sword, is Shanks already dead since he is clashing with the WSS?
No, it just means that whatever Shanks can do, Mihawk can do better. It can be an extreme diff fight, Mihawk's title just means he has a better chance of winning.
I'm not playing favorites, it's just basic portrayal and common sense. Until Mihawk and Shanks clash again, or they fight different opponents, and Mihawk performs better and still holds the title WSS, Mihawk isn't above Shanks.
"It's basic portrayal and common sense" while ignoring that the title of WSS has been a part of Mihawk's portrayal and has been consistently upheld by the author all the way into the current manga. You're playing favorites.
Interesting. I guess Luffy is stronger than Big Mom, as the whole world knows what happened on WCI and Luffy received the W right?
This argument doesn't work because WE know that the circumstances behind this means it's not true. There is no evidence that the same thing can be said about Mihawk's title. Because by the same measure, I can say shit like "Shanks' status as an Emperor is false because the circumstances that got him his title could be dubious like Luffy's."
Just because SOME events in the manga aren't valid because of dubious circumstances doesn't mean you can use that as an argument against EVERY event in the manga. You can use that as a reason for doubt, but not as a reason for dismissal.
@bold: which has not been the case yet, so you keep using an argument that is completely useless.
That wasn't the point of my argument, Einstein. That's just an example of how Mihawk's title can remain in place without fighting Shanks directly.
@underline: The fact that you need to blindly believe everything that Oda chooses to say says a lot. At no point did Oda say that 'Mihawk is stronger than Shanks.'
I never said I blindly believe everything Oda says. I have said it before in this sub, time and time again, that you've seen me say(which makes this argument from you just pathetic), that the CURRENT manga puts Mihawk above Shanks. I have acknowledged that this could change to show that Shanks is exempt from Mihawk's title or that Mihawk's title is invalid for one reason or another, but that can be said about ANYTHING in the manga, making it an invalid argument. Until the manga shows that Mihawk's title doesn't apply to Shanks, it will apply to Shanks. It's that simple.
