The things you'd do for your waifu
Im not transphobic but is it really nessacary that people recognize someone as something they are not.
Aint no narrow minded thinking
You want me to argue with you as to why you don't care about if I recognize him/her as a her? I'll pass.
We're arguing about whether or not she brings significant danger to the fellow inmates and whether biologically being a man is the deciding factor.
How are we arguing whether she brings significant danger to fellow inmates and whether biologically being a dude is the deciding factor if the only thing relevant about this(to you) is her status as a male-to-female tranny?
He/she is legally a man and belongs in a man prison until broken out by the SJWs and white knights. It's really all that simple and I don't see what the argument is.
She shouldn't be in a female prison because she can potentially put the others in danger, but there is always
I said that's the only thing relevant to me when someone accused me of caring whether or not she gets victimized. As in, my outlook on the matter was determined by her status as a male-to-female transsexual, not whether or not she's safer.
Because a man hitting a woman is the same as a woman hitting a woman.....
Notice how your predilection blinds you to common sense. I've already acknowledged that there are women biologically stronger than others. But the man's average biological and physical makeup surpass that of the average woman. It's already considered morally wrong for some for a man to put his hands on a woman. We see that he can be belligerent so what would that do for some who already consider it to be wrong?
Criminals should not be shown sympathy or empathy, actually I disagree, depends on the circumstances. In this situation? She wanted to act like a man and cause harm to someone else so what empathy and sympathy should be shown if the fact is she is a man? Should a man who identifies as a female but doesn't want get a *** change but has a vasectomy, should he go to a female prison if he requests so?
So what more is there to argue? You're sitting basically saying even though this Liger roars like a tiger and looks like a tiger than it's a tiger even though biologically it's a Liger. You using the scuba example was a poor comparison and actually supports what I'm explaining to you. Even though we have the scuba gear, we biologically still cannot breathe underwater just like even though he wanted to get a *** change it doesn't take away from the fact that he is biologically still a he. Understand?
We didn't bypass anything and that's what you don't understand. We still cannot breathe underwater biologically just like he didn't get past being a dude.
Please don't put me in the same boat with someone that doesn't know what a homophone is. Notice how you fail to see that one has to do with one's mentality and one doesn't. The child (can or cannot know) that the parents are adopting them but in what way is the parental role being denied? What changes are needed to be made to match the child's mentality that their parents are taking care of them? None. Like I said it's not comparable, not even in the slightest
And that's your problem, you outlook is blinding your common sense. You already agree that he is a man. Whether or not you agree with the facts, they are there and you cannot take away from that which is factual. He was judged based on being a male.
You're exactly in the same both as him since you're both incapable of understanding arguments, so you repeat the same things over and over like parrots. Even in this post, you still say the same the same thing again as before you can't understand my argument.Because a man hitting a woman is the same as a woman hitting a woman.....
You must be registered for see links
Notice how your predilection blinds you to common sense. I've already acknowledged that there are women biologically stronger than others. But the man's average biological and physical makeup surpass that of the average woman. It's already considered morally for some for a man to put his hands on a woman. We see that he can be belligerent so what would that do for some who already consider it to be wrong?
Criminals should not be shown sympathy or empathy, actually I disagree, depends on the circumstances. In this situation? She wanted to act like a man and cause harm to someone else so what empathy and sympathy should be shown if the fact is she is a man? Should a man who identifies as a female but doesn't want get a *** change but has a vasectomy, should he go to a female prison if he requests so?
So what more is there to argue? You're sitting basically saying even though this Liger roars like a tiger and looks like a tiger than it's a tiger even though biologically it's a Liger. You using the scuba example was a poor comparison and actually supports what I'm explaining to you. Even though we have the scuba gear, we biologically still cannot breathe underwater just like even though he wanted to get a *** change it doesn't take away from the fact that he is biologically still a he. Understand?
We didn't bypass anything and that's what you don't understand. We still cannot breathe underwater biologically just like he didn't get past being a dude.
Please don't put me in the same boat with someone that doesn't know what a homophone is. Notice how you fail to see that one has to do with one's mentality and one doesn't. The child (can or cannot know) that the parents are adopting them but in what way is the parental role being denied? What changes are needed to be made to match the child's mentality that their parents are taking care of them? None. Like I said it's not comparable, not even in the slightest
Concession accepted :sdo:
You didn't counter them at all. You just repeat your own points over and over while either misunderstanding the arguments you reply to or just repeating yourself completely.
