So, in one case, someone can be treated as something they biologically are not in legal matters, but in another case, someone shouldn't be treated as something in legal matters because they are not that thing biologically. Logic.
You didn't respond to my last VM. What were those two words you said are homophones? Say it in this thread so I can get a proper laugh.Learn what a homophone is and then you'll stop being talked about
And following your own logic you don't feel as though a man who identifies as a woman but doesn't get a *** change is not a woman. But admit that a male to female transgender is still a male and should be treated like a female after you admitted that he is still a male Logic right? It's funny how you pick and choose what you want to accept without being bias
I read it once and it was clear he was talking about moral(right or wrong) being homophones with moral(message behind a story). That conversation was stupid as **** because it was clear what he was talking about, but you acted like he was speaking Latin just to be difficult.
I believe that a male-to-female transition should be respected. If you haven't undergone the transition, then you get the luxury/effect someone who has did.
Except it's not two different words. It's the same word but has a different meaning because of the context it is used in. I'd tell you the definition of a homophone but...
I'd say it always is.
And that's where the problem lies, it doesn't matter what we feel. The fact is in both scenarios (this one and the one I've given) they are still men even though they both identify as a woman
Except it does. That's what separates wild animals and humans. Murder, rape, and torture are illegal because how we feel and believe.And that's where the problem lies, it doesn't matter what we feel. The fact is in both scenarios (this one and the one I've given) they are still men even though they both identify as a woman
It's official, you're an idiot
A homophone is a word that is pronounced the same as another word but differs in meaning, and may differ in spelling. The words may be spelled the same, such as rose (flower) and rose (past tense of "rise"), or differently, such as carat, caret, and carrot, or to, two, and too.
I think someone needs to go back to elementary school. This same exact thing is literally sitting on your VM
And then that goes into what is called morality which is subjective seeing as how some people think it's ok to murder
Aint no slippery slope that's What the thread is about
You're really slow to the catch, aren't you?And then that goes into what is called morality which is subjective seeing as how some people think it's ok to murder
You know what's not subjective?
Biology
Which brings me to my earlier points. Fact is, someone who adopts a child should never be treated the same as a biological parent in legal matters because they are not their biological parent. That's a fact, there's no way around it.
The main thing you're missing here is:
It's official, you're an idiot
A homophone is a word that is pronounced the same as another word but differs in meaning, and may differ in spelling. The words may be spelled the same, such as rose (flower) and rose (past tense of "rise"), or differently, such as carat, caret, and carrot, or to, two, and too.
I think someone needs to go back to elementary school. This same exact thing is literally sitting on your VM
Why can't I neg rep your idiocy? The more you post the dumber you look.
No Inanimated both him and I has already explained it to you and you act like you don't understand English. You're not giving a proper answer because anything you try and deny is showing how arrogant and prideful you are. Just take the L and keep it moving
I guess I'll let you mull it over for a while as I've practically done everything besides tell you the answer. Maybe when you understand you'll shoot me a VM or something. Semantics are a ******.
The words may be spelled the same, such as rose (flower) and rose (past tense of "rise"), or differently, such as carat, caret, and carrot, or to, two, and too.I guess I'll let you mull it over for a while as I've practically done everything besides tell you the answer. Maybe when you understand you'll shoot me a VM or something. Semantics are a ******.
