Atheists wouldn't believe if God smacked theme in the face with a unicorn..

[Dreckerplayer]

Your lack of writing anything good, made me write that. Also claiming shit about me, that you state you can see in my writing is just stupid. I can turn it on to you again. Arguing with no good arguments, and just analyzing me like you were a shrink. And we both know your not.

Also I dont need to be a shrink to label you a simple minded child who uses google to find big words that describes personalities.

These aren't big words, buddy. You're so imaginative.

Pretty simple, really. Dude, you're distorted.

I think you're just projecting.

 

[LordBlackZetsu]

It's not an atheist's job to disprove something they didn't conjure. The burden of proof lies within the one claiming there is something. An atheist is just simply rejecting your claim. We have nothing to prove.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

Nope, not against the idea of a "god"...just don't NEED IT.Whether it exists or not.Don't care. Religion and idealism is just an escape from reality!

"nothing can't create something"...how do you know if there was ever a beginning?Who said things started from nothing, I didn't.

All of your arguments are rehearsed, and you're very premeditated. It's TOTALLY a sign of insecurity.

You're making up too many presumptions about me.You assumed I was atheist and have no standing.You made all of these presumptions about me, before actually finding out the truth...that's what premeditated person does .

This thread was a set up.

Also avoiding the topic with childish answers, and no arguments. just banter. Thats insecure dumbass. I know my faith, and what I believe in, you dont have a standing. You dont have anything good to say, so you deflect questions and throw opinions at me. btw theoretical opinions

 

[LordBlackZetsu]

I feel god were an actual animate object, he would get jailed for the death of billions of innocent lives ("natural" disasters, great flood, "apocalypse" or whatever you call it.
He gives us "free will" but if we use that free will to question his existence, we get doomed in eternal agony and fire.... hmmmmm. Think of that for a second.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

It's not an atheist's job to disprove something they didn't conjure. The burden of proof lies within the one claiming there is something. An atheist is just simply rejecting your claim. We have nothing to prove.

Actually it is, because atheism were used long after Christianity. And the reason with the thread was a defense for all the other threads lately. not an attack. I dont care if you become a christian you know

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Also avoiding the topic with childish answers, and no arguments. just banter. Thats insecure dumbass. I know my faith, and what I believe in, you dont have a standing. You dont have anything good to say, so you deflect questions and throw opinions at me. btw theoretical opinions

What are you even talking about?

You're creative.Such imagination.

I don't purposefully argue with people, that's retarded. I don't view "arguments" as the thing to do when informing or addressing someone.That's what validation issues are. We're not on the same page here.

You view "arguing" as some sort of hobby or necessity.Or some kind of "sport" or thing of entitlement.It's not necessary.I'm not one of those people.

You want to use me, to validate yourself.This thread is another set up.

I inform and address people, I don't really care to convince you.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

Have you said anything useful, that is about the topic of this thread. NO. Saying that I'm projecting, isn't the right way to use that word. Again just banter and you playing shrink. no offense really, anyone would get pissed at you when you argue like a small child?

What are you even talking about?

You're creative.Such imagination.

I don't purposefully argue with people, that's retarded. I don't view "arguments" as the thing to do when informing or addressing someone.That's what validation issues are. We're not on the same page here.

You view "arguing" as some sort of hobby or necessity.Or some kind of "sport" or thing of entitlement.It's not necessary.I'm not one of those people.

You want to use me, to validate yourself.This thread is another set up.

I inform and address people, I don't really care to convince you.

1. Why would you comment?
2. Again you say my opinion for me.
3. The way you are describing what I'm doing, isn't normal. Your playing shrink
4. I can say that you are projecting now, thats how you use it
5. read my post above if you didn't get the memo

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Have you said anything useful, that is about the topic of this thread. NO. Saying that I'm projecting, isn't the right way to use that word. Again just banter and you playing shrink. no offense really, anyone would get pissed at you when you argue like a small child?

Yes, you do project onto others. You project your insecurity onto others.

And if you feel that I'm a "small child ""arguing"" with you"...why would you get mad?Does this "small child" get to you?Do you LACK that much security, that a "small child", according to you, gets you PISSED?

I don't care if you're pissed. be pissed.

Oh my god, you're one of those rule-based "Argument fundamental" geeks...so controlling.

I'm not arguing with you, or anyone...I'm not trying persuade anything, just addressing you. That's all.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

What are you even talking about?

You're creative.Such imagination.

I don't purposefully argue with people, that's retarded. I don't view "arguments" as the thing to do when informing or addressing someone.That's what validation issues are. We're not on the same page here.

You view "arguing" as some sort of hobby or necessity.Or some kind of "sport" or thing of entitlement.It's not necessary.I'm not one of those people.

You want to use me, to validate yourself.This thread is another set up.

I inform and address people, I don't really care to convince you.

Its like the you only say what I mean for me, and then you comment about my "secret" opinions for me again. I was talking about the topic from the beginning, you hadn't any good arguments or relevant. So you just commented on my personality, and you choose my opinions for me. childish much?

 

[Mortune]

The essence of belief is the formation of construction of presence of the non-physical or non-present. What you want to believe in is what you decide. Meaning what one believes in, is what's real to the individual. This is different for all but for me, I don't want physical evidence of any God/Goddess's existence. As I am a Christian I don't need it. As the concept of a "God's" physical presence is to mean that particular "God" is confined to that one form or is to be limited by physical form in general. The Christian God is ever-present/omnipresent, so He isn't confined to any form. He is in everyone/everything/everywhere... Meaning he has no limit.
Anyone on earth knows this much: Humans are imperfectly perfect. Which means we are all flawed but work well just the same. Literally made (from the womb) as we are meant to be, but different from anyone else that is around.
There was a speaker in a college talking on this and spoke to the students about this, who put better than I could. An all-powerful being created the universe the planets and everything that is on them. It's stated how God of the christian faith put everything together in only three sentences, "In the beginning..." Which in stated the start of time for the universe. "... God created the Heavens and the Earth..." Stating the formation of the Space and the Universe. "... God said 'Let there be light...'" stating the creation of the Sun. "... God created man, male and female..." And stating the formation of humankind. So you have a being that is responsible for Time, Matter, Space and Life. Should we replace this with the thought that We created an All-mighty being, we eliminate the thought of how we came to be. Thus starting our long never-ending quest to search for THAT answer of our beginning.
By his words he much rather believe in a non-physical ever-present being created us than believe in the concept that was made by a being known worldwide is not perfect and is not all-knowing.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Its like the you only say what I mean for me, and then you comment about my "secret" opinions for me again. I was talking about the topic from the beginning, you hadn't any good arguments or relevant. So you just commented on my personality, and you choose my opinions for me. childish much?

so rule-based, so sentimental.

lmao, you're character obviously has something to do with your views. One way, or another, it all ties into each other.

I didn't make opinions, i simply stated what I saw from you, through observations. Read between the lines.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

Yes, you do project onto others. You project your insecurity onto others.

And if you feel that I'm a "small child ""arguing"" with you"...why would you get mad?Does this "small child" get to you?Do you LACK that much security, that a "small child", according to you, gets you PISSED?

I don't care if you're pissed. be pissed.

Oh my god, you're one of those rule-based "Argument fundamental" geeks...so controlling.

I'm not arguing with you, or anyone...I'm not trying persuade anything, just addressing you. That's all.

yes its hard discussing with a child, that use words the wrong way. AND PROJECTING AGAIN WRONG. YOU REALLY DONT KNOW WHEN TO USE IT.

so rule-based, so sentimental.

lmao, you're character obviously has something to do with your views. One way, or another, it all ties into each other.

I didn't make opinions, i simply stated what I saw from you, through observations. Read between the lines.

Read between the lines. Child much? funny how you talk about my arguing, I really dont think you know how to argue properly. There are no rules wtf? Its how its normal to argue, but I understand its hard for you when you dont know how to use big words. If you do it your way like a child, its just opinions back and forth. Also dont comment if you just want to adress people like a shrink. thats banter fool

 

[Mortune]

This thread can easily be defused by the fact that even if somebody or anyone for that matter does believe in a god or another. It's their personal choice. Through my beliefs, that's the way of freewill. Freedom of choice and expression without anyone trying to control or enforce another's influence on them. If you don't/do believe that's okay.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

The essence of belief is the formation of construction of presence of the non-physical or non-present. What you want to believe in is what you decide. Meaning what one believes in, is what's real to the individual. This is different for all but for me, I don't want physical evidence of any God/Goddess's existence. As I am a Christian I don't need it. As the concept of a "God's" physical presence is to mean that particular "God" is confined to that one form or is to be limited by physical form in general. The Christian God is ever-present/omnipresent, so He isn't confined to any form. He is in everyone/everything/everywhere... Meaning he has no limit.
Anyone on earth knows this much: Humans are imperfectly perfect. Which means we are all flawed but work well just the same. Literally made (from the womb) as we are meant to be, but different from anyone else that is around.
There was a speaker in a college talking on this and spoke to the students about this, who put better than I could. An all-powerful being created the universe the planets and everything that is on them. It's stated how God of the christian faith put everything together in only three sentences, "In the beginning..." Which in stated the start of time for the universe. "... God created the Heavens and the Earth..." Stating the formation of the Space and the Universe. "... God said 'Let there be light...'" stating the creation of the Sun. "... God created man, male and female..." And stating the formation of humankind. So you have a being that is responsible for Time, Matter, Space and Life. Should we replace this with the thought that We created an All-mighty being, we eliminate the thought of how we came to be. Thus starting our long never-ending quest to search for THAT answer of our beginning.
By his words he much rather believe in a non-physical ever-present being created us than believe in the concept that was made by a being known worldwide is not perfect and is not all-knowing.

Thats a real answer! thank you, dont have to agree. But at last not a child

 

[Dreckerplayer]

yes its hard discussing with a child, that use words the wrong way. AND PROJECTING AGAIN WRONG. YOU REALLY DONT KNOW WHEN TO USE IT.

Projection(Psychological)- "An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial."

Just to inform you, since you don't know.

 

[YowYan]

Spot the user with daddy issues for 200.

I'm 24 and have my own place, I got no problem with him

200 what?..

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

This thread can easily be defused by the fact that even if somebody or anyone for that matter does believe in a god or another. It's their personal choice. Through my beliefs, that's the way of freewill. Freedom of choice and expression without anyone trying to control or enforce another's influence on them. If you don't/do believe that's okay.

Agreed. The meaning of the thread was only to let people know that atheists dont have proof to disprove god. Nothing else

 

[Mortune]

Through my personal experiences I found it easier to live with my faith than without it. But It's considered a sin if I try to force my ways down someone's throat.

 

[sasuke uchiha94]

Projection(Psychological)- "An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial."

Just to inform you, since you don't know.

oh man thank you! you googled it... lol NO you can't because you dont know me, you can't base your meaning of some comments. And again if you look at the comments its a stupid conclusion from your side. So young man, thats not how you use it.

Now you are just saying that out of principle, not to look stupid. thats just sad man

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Agreed. The meaning of the thread was only to let people know that atheists dont have proof to disprove god. Nothing else

Exactly, validating yourself. A "set up".