is Naruto manga still a great or good manga to you or not anymore?

Jimmy page

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
736
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
"Minor" flaws in the story? :rolleyes:

I made two threads about some the major flaws in the story like Sakura's character and the Oosutsuki mess.
While I do agree those are pretty major flaws , I think in context of a 700 chapter manga that they don't really drag it down that much. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the good outweighs the bad. The manga was solid for a good 500-600 chapters.
 

MAN OF SIN

Active member
Elite
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
8,279
Kin
30💸
Kumi
273💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
While I do agree those are pretty major flaws , I think in context of a 700 chapter manga that they don't really drag it down that much. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the good outweighs the bad. The manga was solid for a good 500-600 chapters.
With me it's more of an issue of quality over quantity. While it had more positives than negatives, the negatives were so awful that they overshadow the good. I would say that it stopped being solid the moment Tobi appeared, as that mystery was a massive waste of time.

Cmon Kishi is an avg write
The war arc was only the dragged out thing
Actually Kishi is below average as a writer. His first editor was the reason it was ever good. After he left after the Itachi arc the story went to shit.
 
Last edited:

ninjarasengan

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
3,237
Kin
3💸
Kumi
12💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Not after we saw how Hamura helped. Hagoromo's whole legend was retconned

not really, it's just convoluted.

after sealing Juubi Hagoromo researched releasing It...after finding out Juubi's power was required he could've went back and sealed it into himself with Hamura's help.(the first RCT..may have crumbled)

Kyurama confirmed he had the Gedou mazo so nothing was really retconned. Until Kishi actually fully explains it.
 

MAN OF SIN

Active member
Elite
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
8,279
Kin
30💸
Kumi
273💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
not really, it's just convoluted.

after sealing Juubi Hagoromo researched releasing It...after finding out Juubi's power was required he could've went back and sealed it into himself with Hamura's help.(the first RCT..may have crumbled)

Kyurama confirmed he had the Gedou mazo so nothing was really retconned. Until Kishi actually fully explains it.
The databook said that the brothers sealed the Juubi in the moon and that was it. Kishi created a plot hole.
 

Prometheus Beta

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
877
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Part 1 was good and it was one of the animes that I grew up with, but now that I have read so many other manga to compare with, overall I have to say that it is a pretty mediocre manga.
 

Byron123

Active member
Elite
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
5,750
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I love it, I may have not liked particularly kaguya's introduction but I'll wait for the movie as well. In any case, it remains my favourite.
 

Kyoto Samurai

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
5,571
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
it went down hill when part 2 arrived and it was all about chasing sausage. naruto and sakura were literary obsessed with him when he didn't care about them. that's not friendship
 
Top