Case in point, just because the movie references Hamura and apparently shows how NaruHina became an item, that does not mean that the movie itself is canon. The movie supposedly features some random villain named Toneri and is focused on the moon falling to the Earth. Toneri is a filler character, he has no relevance to the manga. The moon falling to the Earth was not in the manga and I could argue its contradictory to how the ending in 699 played out.
Its similar to the plotline with Utakata. Just because Utakata was a manga character, that does not mean that his filler arc was canon. Naruto did not know Utakata when he met him in the manga, that means that plotline is non canon. This movie might feature a canon couple, but that does not mean the plotline of the movie is canon. The movie might reference a known manga character (Hamura) but that does not make it canon. For the movie to be canon you'd have to accept everything that happened as canon and I find that unimaginable. Just because Kishi says its related to the manga does not mean its canon, it just uses aspects of canon material to support the filler plot.
I admit I was wrong in my last thread about Tsunade simply attaching a Zetu arm to Naruto's body, but just because the movie talks about Hamura and features a canon couple, that does not mean the entire plotline is canon. If you disagree, please explain to me why you think it is canon. Please refrain from telling me Kishi said it was canon because he has not done that. He has only stated that its related to the manga, which refers to the non canon villain sharing the same heritage of the sage. I hope people can handle this thread maturely. Thanks for reading as always.
Its similar to the plotline with Utakata. Just because Utakata was a manga character, that does not mean that his filler arc was canon. Naruto did not know Utakata when he met him in the manga, that means that plotline is non canon. This movie might feature a canon couple, but that does not mean the plotline of the movie is canon. The movie might reference a known manga character (Hamura) but that does not make it canon. For the movie to be canon you'd have to accept everything that happened as canon and I find that unimaginable. Just because Kishi says its related to the manga does not mean its canon, it just uses aspects of canon material to support the filler plot.
I admit I was wrong in my last thread about Tsunade simply attaching a Zetu arm to Naruto's body, but just because the movie talks about Hamura and features a canon couple, that does not mean the entire plotline is canon. If you disagree, please explain to me why you think it is canon. Please refrain from telling me Kishi said it was canon because he has not done that. He has only stated that its related to the manga, which refers to the non canon villain sharing the same heritage of the sage. I hope people can handle this thread maturely. Thanks for reading as always.