[Game] SK-Tower Of God! The Great War!!! #28

[Michelle]

tbh not liking mich right now

as for kyte I m hanging

why? because i was questioning you?

 

[AL_sama]

@Imperfection boy yo dipped??

 

[Michelle]

I m reading as scum change my mind if possible

don't wanna sir, you are stubborn and implies too much effort

 

[Premfection]

@TheLukundo

Just because I wanted to clear this up. No my abilities post was not TMI, I got it from original post.

The abilities in this game varies and unique, expect to see variety of active abilities performed during the DP and NP.

I'm gonna go back and read some, then list my current thoughts.

 

[Premfection]

@Imperfection boy yo dipped??

Took a nap btw

 

[AL_sama]

why? because i was questioning you?

you questioned me?

I m reading you scum for your play

 

[Michelle]

you questioned me?

I m reading you scum for your play

How come this is your towny thought Al? Explain

 

[Toujo]

i think the lack is in town logic. You are searching 'actively' for scum but you are not successfull in this. Is like we play different games because our reads are not aligned and i don't see such an experimented player rushing reads like you did.

Woah woah woah. Hold up. There are multiple things wrong with this post. The biggest offender is you insisting an "experienced player" must subscribe to the same philosophy you do. This is asinine. You don't know how I play, and you don't know how much value it can serve. Secondly, the foundation of this assertion is completely wrong. This is the post I made my reads in:

Okay, I can do that. I have a bigger post in the works where I'm summarising it so I'll be sure to revisit these things so make it clearer. For reference though, I have the following early readys

Imp - scum
X - town
Poison - scum
you - scum*

Do you see how I specifically call them "early reads"? That is to say, they're quick fire things that I am in no way stuck on. Why are you pushing the idea that I'm somehow claiming that these reads are solid ones that have a lot of basis to them? I have repeatedly said in this thread that my reads are fluid and open to evolving. I need tyou to address this ASAP, because otherwise this is straight up BS.

i reacted at that with what i said about my level of reads. You take it as answer for what you 'pointed out' but it isn't.

So you only addressed part of the post, without making that clear, and then you wanted me to just know that? Okay...

Your impression from a game has no value as long as you don't check the meta yourself to see his scum behaviour in a scum and town behaviour in a town game. You are assuming things here.
His fluff is NAI but he had also serious posts. I explained it once.
Do you see my issue here with you rushing things?

What? How am I supposed to check his meta myself? Do you have any idea how little I value metagaming in this game? Of course I'm assuming things - I have to do so. It's my first proper game on this community. This is why I asked you for clarity. I'm also not sure what you mean by rushing? Look, I'm going to ask this once. Please do not just to conclusions in my posts that aren't there. I'm not prepared to waste my time explaining every last reach you're making if this is the standard of play you are bringing to the table. I mean, I am, but it's obnoxious as hell for me to do so. Take a step back, and try to see what it actually is I'm saying.

This is actually worse, the vote is town's number one weapon.

Please don't patronise me on the basics of Mafia. It's neither welcome nor appreciated. My point, which you have so woefully missed, clearly - is that the fact I am not voting for any of them is indicative of me not feeling particularly strong on any of my scum reads (or reads at all, actually). So your assertion that I must be looking for a quick lynch (this early in day 1, too...?) doesn't stand up to reason. So the issue here is that you're refusing to consider my behaviour, and instead you're jumping to conclusions that you want just to make it easier to address what I'm saying. That isn't going to fly. My vote is on who it is for a reason.

Anyone may have benign circumstancies for an absence. For eg i had to do the dishes and switch to laptop to make this post and this took the time who passed between your post and my answer. This is not an issue, the problem is you didn't give me the presumption of innocence before jumping to shady conclusions.

Of course they might. Have you seen me push this solely as a scum point? No. But I don't owe you any presumption of innocence. Especially when you have spun your own tales regarding what it is I've done and said. I made an observation - one that has sent you reeling into an overly-defensive spiral for reasons I'm honestly not sure why. I didn't even have you on my scum list!

What a generosity, why would you do this?

I said so there, did I not? Are you not even reading posts that total one line now? Here, I'll quote it for you:

I'm willing to let issue 3 slide at this point, as there isn't anything productive to be discussed there

as there isn't anything productive to be discussed there

How did you miss this???

 

[TheLukundo]

@TheLukundo

Just because I wanted to clear this up. No my abilities post was not TMI, I got it from original post.



I'm gonna go back and read some, then list my current thoughts.

Oh. Oh damn. Aight.
Unvote: Imperfection

 

[TheLukundo]

Hmmm

 

[TheLukundo]

Well shit

 

[TheLukundo]

VoteLynch: Houtarou

 

[TheLukundo]

Damn. You 2 are feisty. Jfc.

 

[TheLukundo]

Both of yous sassy af

 

[TheLukundo]

Aether, Mich, X

 

[TheLukundo]

3? On D1?

 

[TheLukundo]

****

 

[TheLukundo]

Just Red, Ansa and CD

 

[TheLukundo]

XD*

 

[Toujo]

Also, quick thing I wanted to address re: Luk. I did mention I didn't think he was playing seriously... but that was in the beginning. That's long since been retracted. What prompted the lack of seriousness read was posts 5, 6, 7 and 20. That's just from page 1, and I could easily include a couple more in there. Now Michelle claimed that the read on Luk is based on whether he makes serious posts or not. So when I saw what I feel are pretty clearly not serious posts, I thought "hmm, that should be scum meta then". But it wasn't, Michelle dismissed is as NAI. Hence my confusion as to how Michelle is actually meta reading Luk. A meta read Michelle insists I should inform myself on. And yet the best I can get is "he makes some serious posts at all then he's town". It seems like such an arbitrary and weird way to establish a meta, but whatever.