U need evidence that sengoku is weaker, what about garp? him to why dont you send fanmail to oda and ask him, its common sense that the guy is past his prime as everyone else in his age group are past their prime, sengoku isnt some exception.
We can't assume a person is significantly weaker than their youth just because they're old. Even if you want to say they're weaker, you can't immediately say they're
significantly weaker. Garp and Sengoku have had no indication that they're weaker at all, much less being so much weaker that they're a shadow of their past selves.
Let's take a look at precedence:
1. Oda himself said he wanted to create a manga where old people are still powerful and wanted to go against reality where people get weaker as they age. That already throws away the notion that because people in real life get way weaker than their youth, that the same applies for the manga, since Oda said he wanted to depict a fantasy where the opposite happens.
You must be registered for see images
2. Only two old people of the manga have been shown to be weaker than their prime: Whitebeard and Rayleigh. Interesting to note is that Whitebeard grew weaker because of an illness, and Rayleigh grew weaker because he stopped fighting(said he hadn't picked up a sword in ages and was living a casual life). For people like Garp and Sengoku who are still fighting as Marines and don't have Whitebeard's illness, you can't say they're so much weaker that they're no longer top tier without actual proof of it.
Where is Cp-0 hype, i dont see them anywhere near the admiral hype, so yes they are weaker unless proven otherwise.
That's not how that works. When a character is introduced with nothing to place them in the power scale, they remain an unknown variable in terms of debate. You can't use them say a character is strong, or a character is weak, until their placement in the power scale starts getting revealed.
a ship is something that is relatively easy to acquire especially for a strong pirate, but its really not worth the trouble to fight an admiral over it. Its like saying why doesnt BM just go fight a war with shanks or other factions for OP, its mutual destruction thats why. I cant believe you need all this to be explained,
Except Blackbeard stated they needed a battle ship because of Sanjuan Wolf's size, and they couldn't travel without it. And this still doesn't change that Blackbeard said he wasn't strong enough for Akainu either.
why would he bother keeping one of the key road poneglyphs in his possessions then? he has some interest in it otherwise it would be useless to him. He has some aspirations, you can have more than one dream. Bm is a good example.
How am I supposed to know? The fact of the matter is though, you can't say a character wants to be Pirate King unless that's been shown in the manga.
Are you stupid he used akainu to say that is too strong of a starting point, dont twist his words.
That's not what he said though. He said he needs a character he can develop instead of just starting powerful, and gave Akainu as an example of the latter. Oda's words didn't convey anything about developing Akainu at all, since he gave him as an example to be the opposite of a character that would develop.
"When creating a protagonist, it is important not to make him too strong.
For example, if Akainu became the protagonist, I could put an end to ONE PIECE within a year."
he cited akainu as a perfect example of being too strong to be a protagonist. if akainu was so strong he would be above kaido but oda is not about that so... what i say makes a ton more sense than your nonsense theory as usual.
This is a false equivalence. Saying Akainu is strong enough to become Pirate King in a year is not the same thing as saying he's stronger than Kaido.
so a prime shanks = an old sengoku. you are so delusional. I forgot BB also mentioned that. along with all the other evidence of him what I said is absolutely correct as usual.
Where did you even get this from in my post?