Obito wasn't so young

UchiHaHaHa

Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
125
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Yeah... seeing Kakashi was 7-8 years old when he became Chunnin that would probably make him around (not it said 6 years YOUNGER than naruto- not at the age of 6 years). That means around Obito's death, Kakashi would be around 10-12 when Obito died, and about 4-5 years later Obito would indeed be at least 18-20 years of age





Kakashi passed the test "6 years younger than Naruto" Naruto was 13-14 years old (about) That means Kakashi was around 7-8 years old, and Obito passed the test when he was probably 12-13 years old
I relied on the Wiki and it said Kakashi became chuunin at 6, But your understanding what I'm saying Obito is 4 years older than Kakashi.
 

UchiHaHaHa

Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
125
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
You didn't read your own ****ing link. Your own link says obito "died" at 13, sixteen years ago, that would make him 29-30 depending on how you fudge the numbers. The EXACT same age as kakashi.
I was working with the numbers regarding the promotions. If their the same age how can Kakashi graduate at 6 and Obito at 9 and they're still in the same class? I doubt Kakashi decided to stay an extra 3 years for fun.
 

AP2k

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
5,089
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I was working with the numbers regarding the promotions. If their the same age how can Kakashi graduate at 6 and Obito at 9 and they're still in the same class? I doubt Kakashi decided to stay an extra 3 years for fun.
Why are you trying to justify what is a clear writing mistake? Either kishi forgot kakashi graduated so early or he changed his mind. Either way they're the same age.
 

Odemgee

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
136
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
UMM No. They didn't become chuunin at the same time.
They took the test at the same time, Kakashi passed at 5, Obito failed it like twice. Then passed.
But obito didn't join the academy till age 9 so either his age of death is wrong or the age he joined the academy is wrong. Which means it depends on which side of the tobi=obito fence you're on on which one you choose is right.
 

supino

Active member
Regular
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
915
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.

what if both are the same age, but Kakashi simply moved ahead faster than Obito?

let's say that you have two people, Kakashi and Obito for example, born in 1990.
Kakashi takes his whatever diploma when he is 5/6, that is in 1995/1996
and Obito takes the same diploma when he is 9, that is in 1999.
they both have the same age but one got his qualifications faster than the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trea

Odemgee

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
136
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.

Obito graduated the academy at age 9 to become a genin while kakashi was a genin at age 5 they took the chunin exam together on the same team. Kakisha became chunin by beating gai who hadn't beaten obito the round before. Kakakshi was 6 when he became chunin so they couldn't have possibly have been the same age.
 

ANewLight

Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
76
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.

This isn't rocket science. Kakashi became chuunin sooner than Obito and Rin. When Obito finally became a chuunin, Kakashi passed the jounin exam.

They were all about the same age in Kakashi Gaiden.

Edit : OP, what you are implying is that Obito was 16-17 at the time of Kakashi Gaiden which is nothing more than outright ridiculous.
No I'm saying Obito was 13 during the Gaiden & Kakashi was 9.
 

KidGamer65

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
38,776
Kin
8๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Awards
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Ok guys so the main argument against Obito by Izuna fans, is the timeline.

And that's because apparently Obito was 14 during the Konoha attack, due to some databook saying so. But a lot of people seem not to realize the truth here.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? Yes.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? Yes.

Does Kishimoto give a shit?
No.


The databook isn't canon. Ages have never been stressed in the manga, and that's all that matters. If Kishi decided to change his mind about the characters ages, then let it be, the databook is nothing but a mere draft. Therefore, Obito was an adult during the Konoha attack and your points are invalid. It's that simple.


TL;DR : **** the timeline plot holes and all the arguments made around them by the angry Izuna fanboys. Kishimoto > databook.
Fail logic in bold, Kishimoto wrote it, Kishimoto=Databook.
 
Top