Obito wasn't so young

Henchman24

Active member
Regular
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
1,274
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.

Wrong, Obito was 14 attacking. 13 + 1 = 14 since it was one year aftrr his death
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This states that Obito graduated form the academy at age 9.

Kakashi graduated at age 5.

Obito is 4 years older.



This states that at age 13 Kakashi he was chosen to lead Obito and Rin. This was just after he became Jonin. Obito would be 16 at this time.
 

ANewLight

Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
76
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Obito is four years older then Kakashi.



This states that Obito graduated form the academy at age 9.

Kakashi graduated at age 5.

Obito is 4 years older.



This states that at age 13 Kakashi he was chosen to lead Obito and Rin. This was just after he became Jonin. Obito would be 16 at this time.
Obito was 13 when he died & Kakashi's age at the time was never stated. That is written there because everyone assumed that they were the same age, which isn't true.
 

Armathyx

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
892
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Kakashi and Obito's age

Ok guys so the main argument against Obito by Izuna fans, is the timeline.

And that's because apparently Obito was 14 during the Konoha attack, due to some databook saying so. But a lot of people seem not to realize the truth here.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? Yes.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? Yes.

Does Kishimoto give a shit?
No.


The databook isn't canon. Ages have never been stressed in the manga, and that's all that matters. If Kishi decided to change his mind about the characters ages, then let it be, the databook is nothing but a mere draft. Therefore, Obito was an adult during the Konoha attack and your points are invalid. It's that simple.


TL;DR : **** the timeline plot holes and all the arguments made around them by the angry Izuna fanboys. Kishimoto > databook.
 

choft

Active member
Regular
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,873
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Ok guys so the main argument against Obito by Izuna fans, is the timeline.

And that's because apparently Obito was 14 during the Konoha attack, due to some databook saying so. But a lot of people seem not to realize the truth here.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? Yes.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? Yes.

Does Kishimoto give a shit?
No.


The databook isn't canon. Ages have never been stressed in the manga, and that's all that matters. If Kishi decided to change his mind about the characters ages, then let it be, the databook is nothing but a mere draft. Therefore, Obito was an adult during the Konoha attack and your points are invalid. It's that simple.


TL;DR : **** the timeline plot holes and all the arguments made around them by the angry Izuna fanboys. Kishimoto > databook.
You're really hypocritical, you know that right?

You ask people for evidence of Kakashi's age in the manga, yet you don't give us any evidence that Kishi disregards his databook. Stop making things up. Either show me evidence somewhere, or you're just making stuff up to fit your arguments.

And it's not Kishi > databook. It's Kishi = Databook, as it's written by Kishi. Just like the manga.
 

Bad Touch Yakushi

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
19,411
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Oh just because I don't like the idea of Tobi being Obito I must be a Izuna fanboy.

Izuna fanboy.

ffs, personally it has to be Obito, the manga literally revealed that it was Obito but at the same time there is just too much wrong information surrounding it. It's more than just some ages but honestly i'm getting too sick of these Obito threads to even argue back anymore.
 

ANewLight

Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
76
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Ok guys so the main argument against Obito by Izuna fans, is the timeline.

And that's because apparently Obito was 14 during the Konoha attack, due to some databook saying so. But a lot of people seem not to realize the truth here.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? Yes.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? Yes.

Does Kishimoto give a shit?
No.


The databook isn't canon. Ages have never been stressed in the manga, and that's all that matters. If Kishi decided to change his mind about the characters ages, then let it be, the databook is nothing but a mere draft. Therefore, Obito was an adult during the Konoha attack and your points are invalid. It's that simple.


TL;DR : **** the timeline plot holes and all the arguments made around them by the angry Izuna fanboys. Kishimoto > databook.
You're wrong.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? no.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? No.

According to the databook Obito is four years older then Kakashi. This was proven by the last chapter & the databooks. Because the databooks say that Kakashi became a Chunin when he was 6 & that Obito didn't graduate from the academy until he was 9. There is no way that Obito could have taken part in the Chunin exams before becoming a Genin.

Obito would have been 18 during the fox attack.

Also Kishimoto wrote the databooks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: choft

choft

Active member
Regular
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,873
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

According to the databook Obito is four years older then Kakashi. This was proven by the last chapter & the databooks. Because the databooks say that Kakashi became a Chunin when he was 6 & that Obito didn't graduate from the academy until he was 9. There is no way that Obito could have taken part in the Chunin exams before becoming a Genin.
Actually, that's a good point. :/

Especially the bolded part. Kishi wtf?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
391
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Another plothole. Kisame recognized long haired Tobi and short haired Tobi as the same person. Therefore, Obito was the one controlling the Yagura. My question is how is this possible? The village of the bloody mist occurred before the third ninja world war. If it was Obito then he would be 9, before he was even crushed by boulders. I don't think Kishi will be able to explain this.
 

Unbiased

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
3,295
Kin
8๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
3๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Kakashi and Obito's age

Ok guys so the main argument against Obito by Izuna fans, is the timeline.

And that's because apparently Obito was 14 during the Konoha attack, due to some databook saying so. But a lot of people seem not to realize the truth here.

Is Obito supposed to be 30 according to the databook? Yes.

Is Obito supposed to have been 14 during the Konoha attack according to the databook? Yes.

Does Kishimoto give a shit?
No.


The databook isn't canon. Ages have never been stressed in the manga, and that's all that matters. If Kishi decided to change his mind about the characters ages, then let it be, the databook is nothing but a mere draft. Therefore, Obito was an adult during the Konoha attack and your points are invalid. It's that simple.


TL;DR : **** the timeline plot holes and all the arguments made around them by the angry Izuna fanboys. Kishimoto > databook.
Kishi made the databook therefore Databook=kishi

Kishimoto is a lazy writer. He can't even keep his stories straight.
 
Top