More liberal hipocrisy

[slimreaper]

Give everybody a gun to prevent mass shootings.

Such genius much Murica.

You must be registered for see links

Such proof, much convincing

 

[Fresco]

It worked in vietnam 1. 2 America will be resistant to destroy it's own cities. When the war is over, what would they be left with. Just like Russia is arming the Ukrainian rebels now, they would arm us as well.

As for blaze, criminals already have guns and it doesn't stop them from using them. All you are hurting is the law abiding citizens

Since Russia and China will arm us, why does everyone need a weapon now exactly?

 

[slimreaper]

Since Russia and China will arm us, why does everyone need a weapon now exactly?

Incase it's not in their interests to arm us. It all depends on how this hypothetical situation plays out. Not to mention the U.S Mainland being invaded, we provide incentive to not. And finally because stupid liberals want the criminals( who don't get their guns legally) to be armed and regular people to have no protection apparently

 

[Baelor]

But hey who am I to stop American freedom, buy guns as much as you like.

Too bad the teenagers in the rest of the world will never know the joy of emptying their parents gun in their school

 

[slimreaper]

But hey who am I to stop American freedom, buy guns as much as you like.

Too bad the teenagers in the rest of the world will never know the joy of emptying their parents gun in their school

You must be registered for see links

 

[paratise]

It's what puts us above everyone else. Invading the mainland in america is nearly impossible because largest amounts of citizens are armed. The same can't be said for europe or china

No it is because USA spends more money on its military then about top following 30 military countries combined and it is too really far off for some country to casually enter with troops. Also NATO countries are out there as bases and military supplies against the possible country which somehow does this type of attack (which can be Russia and/or China) When was the time there was a war in US's mainland (involving other countries)? This is the weirdest justification for pro-gun.

 

[slimreaper]

No it is because USA spends more money on its military then about top following 30 military countries combined and it is too really far off for some country to casually enter with troops. Also NATO countries are out there as bases and military supplies against the possible country which somehow does this type of attack (which can be Russia and/or China) When was the time there was a war in US's mainland (involving other countries)? This is the weirdest justification for pro-gun.

We always take the war to them before they can attack the mainland

 

[Unbiased]

No it is because USA spends more money on its military then about top following 30 military countries combined and it is too really far off for some country to casually enter with troops. Also NATO countries are out there as bases and military supplies against the possible country which somehow does this type of attack (which can be Russia and/or China) When was the time there was a war in US's mainland (involving other countries)? This is the weirdest justification for pro-gun.

Plenty. War of 1812. American revolution. When we acquired Texas, new Mexico, and California. When we were fighting Indians and taking their land.

 

[paratise]

We always take the war to them before they can attack the mainland

That is not far off from what i am saying...

Plenty. War of 1812. American revolution. When we acquired Texas, new Mexico, and California. When we were fighting Indians and taking their land.

Involving other countries, not internal conflicts. Like which country moved its thousands of troops and weapons and a part of USA turned into a large scale multi national battlefield?

 

[Unbiased]

That is not far off from what i am saying...

Involving other countries, not internal conflicts. Like which country moved its thousands of troops and weapons and a part of USA turned into a large scale multi national battlefield?

Great Britain, Native Americans, French, Mexican, Canadian, and currently ISIS.

 

[YowYan]

Without the USA the world would be speaking German or Japanese. Guns are a big part because the world is too pathetic to protect itself

Without USA's involvement, Hitler wouldn't have gotten the financial aid he needed to kick off his campaign.

OT: Muricans have guns so they can protect themselves from a tyrannical government. Which is where all the law & regulations proposals come from. To unarm the masses. And no nation uses as many mind- confusing drugs in the u.s. No shit there will be some lunatics shooting at people.

 

[Bronze]

France and Britain had already pretty much lost WW2 before we stepped in. It would have been Russia vs the combined Axis powers if a fresh America didn't step in

Without the USA the world would be speaking German or Japanese. Guns are a big part because the world is too pathetic to protect itself

Is that what you're taught in history lessons? If so, my Goodness! I can now understand why your educational system is ranked deep low compared to the world.

+50% of Nazi Germany's military campaigns was focused at Eastern Front, which was defeated by the Soviet Union. Though Britain and US did provide the necessary equipment as the Soviets didn't possess them at the time, and Nazi Germany was technologically more advanced the Soviets. You still hardly did anything in Europe, where most of the war was concentrated at. Britain had defeated Nazi Germany in the western region, and Soviets defeated Nazi Germany in the eastern region.

Britain, along with its commonwealth, defeated Axis in Africa, Mediterranean and Middle East. And they were defeating Imperial Japan in Pacific, with minor help from US and China.

Please, you didn't save the world. You contributed into helping the world, but you didn't save it. Most of the work was done by British Empire and that's why the one who suffered the most was Britain Empire.

 

[paratise]

Great Britain,

Before independence USA was a part of Britain.

Native Americans,

They are Americans from mainland of US ._.

French,

French was colonizing North America like Britain. They were not an external nation against European Americans.

Mexican, Canadian,

They are from American continent, Canada was an European colonization like US and the other conflicts mainly occured in Mexico.

and currently ISIS.

War goes in Middle East there is no heated conflict in US.

 

[Forest]

Lol what? I guess what you are saying makes sense to you but if you really think about it, you are tryna make a point on a false assumption. You are generalizing, you don't know all liberals opinions on the origins and reasons for racial profiling.
also sometimes can't help but wonder wat exactly is getting ruined for the vast majority of gun owners? When you think about it, the vast majority of gun owners, are already a vast majority of Gun owners. Da fuq do you need anymore than to already have a gun? IF you already have a gun, keep that ***** no smart person is gonna try and come get it from you.

 

[BLAZE]

Without the USA the world would be speaking German or Japanese. Guns are a big part because the world is too pathetic to protect itself

Lel this guy :lol

 

[Unbiased]

Before independence USA was a part of Britain.


They are Americans from mainland of US ._.


French was colonizing North America like Britain. They were not an external nation against European Americans.


They are from American continent, Canada was an European colonization like US and the other conflicts mainly occured in Mexico.


War goes in Middle East there is no heated conflict in US.

French, Great Britain, and the natives all fought wars here for years literally. Same goes for Canada. Isis has been attacking recruiting stations, rallies, and threatening service members. Your question was which external country has built up it's forces on American soil and this is it.

 

[Unbiased]

Is that what you're taught in history lessons? If so, my Goodness! I can now understand why your educational system is ranked deep low compared to the world.

+50% of Nazi Germany's military campaigns was focused at Eastern Front, which was defeated by the Soviet Union. Though Britain and US did provide the necessary equipment as the Soviets didn't possess them at the time, and Nazi Germany was technologically more advanced the Soviets. You still hardly did anything in Europe, where most of the war was concentrated at. Britain had defeated Nazi Germany in the western region, and Soviets defeated Nazi Germany in the eastern region.

Britain, along with its commonwealth, defeated Axis in Africa, Mediterranean and Middle East. And they were defeating Imperial Japan in Pacific, with minor help from US and China.

Please, you didn't save the world. You contributed into helping the world, but you didn't save it. Most of the work was done by British Empire and that's why the one who suffered the most was Britain Empire.

You're joking right? It's commonly known that the invasion of Normandy, an American led invasion, is what took back Europe. The brits had v2 rockets raining on them 200+ miles away in addition to serve and heavy losses to its air force and navy. Until The USA intervened and forced the natzis to divert forces from the eastern front, did the Soviets succeed. They were less then one hundred miles from Moscow. Even today they're finding bodies all over Russia.

 

[Bronze]

You're joking right? It's commonly known that the invasion of Normandy, an American led invasion, is what took back Europe. The brits had v2 rockets raining on them 200+ miles away in addition to serve and heavy losses to its air force and navy. Until The USA intervened and forced the natzis to divert forces from the eastern front, did the Soviets succeed. They were less then one hundred miles from Moscow. Even today they're finding bodies all over Russia.

So because an American commander lead the invasion, means that America saved Europe? Jesus. No, it's a coalition of allies against an enemy; anyone of the allies can be chosen as commander of an operation. I'll repeat again: You helped save the world, but you didn't save it yourself. Britain was strategically the key player in the war, since they had control over Africa and Middle East, which are rich in natural resources like oil and natural gas, and the Axis wanted to control them for unlimited fuel for their vehicles; had the British and its colonies not pushed them out of those regions, Axis would have won by pure resource.

The Soviets were killing Germans in Eastern Europe, occupying each territory until they reached Eastern Germany. The Soviets were being supplied by both Britain and US to combat German professional army and sophisticated weapons. There were no US or British deployed troops with the Soviets, so explain to me how you saved the Soviets from the Nazis? Do you even know how big Russia is? Lmao at bodies found all over it.

The whole world is taught that British Commonwealth, Soviet Union and United States saved the world from Axis in WW2, but only you Americans are taught that United States saved the world. :lol

 

[ZK]

WW2 wouldn't have really happened if US hadn't saved them in WW1 heck even if they had saved them in WW1 but if had not blamed Germany for WW1 and held massively responsible for it WW2 could have been dodged.....not to mention germany weren't to be blamed for WW1....but it's not her nor there....

This is objectively untrue and you really shouldn't propagate this view. The US entering the war was a major milestone and it did spur the German offensive, which in turn almost collapsed the Western Front, but at this point the war of attrition had been going on for a long time. The US was an important ally for, well, the Allies, but their troops were fresh-off-the-boat and their generals were untrained in the effective strategies used by the Allies.

You must be registered for see links

The US supplied the Allies with material and with food; that was what had the greatest impact on the war. Their troops surely shortened the war and improved the morale of the Allies, but they did not 'save' the French and the British. I believe they owe that to themselves.

Also; a lot of countries were to blame for WW1. Germany just happened to be the only major 'Axis' nation that did not collapse as a result of the war. Still, countries like Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire got more than a slap on the wrist. Austria Hungary collapsed into multiple nations, as did the Ottoman Empire. Treaties like Trianon, Saint-Germain and Sevres illustrate very well how the Allies dealt with the Axis nations, even the newly-independent ones.

 

[Unbiased]

So because an American commander lead the invasion, means that America saved Europe? Jesus. No, it's a coalition of allies against an enemy; anyone of the allies can be chosen as commander of an operation. I'll repeat again: You helped save the world, but you didn't save it yourself. Britain was strategically the key player in the war, since they had control over Africa and Middle East, which are rich in natural resources like oil and natural gas, and the Axis wanted to control them for unlimited fuel for their vehicles; had the British and its colonies not pushed them out of those regions, Axis would have won by pure resource.

The Soviets were killing Germans in Eastern Europe, occupying each territory until they reached Eastern Germany. The Soviets were being supplied by both Britain and US to combat German professional army and sophisticated weapons. There were no US or British deployed troops with the Soviets, so explain to me how you saved the Soviets from the Nazis? Do you even know how big Russia is? Lmao at bodies found all over it.

The whole world is taught that British Commonwealth, Soviet Union and United States saved the world from Axis in WW2, but only you Americans are taught that United States saved the world. :lol

Until The Americans got involved, western Europe was lost. There's a reason the axis was able to confidently bomb Britain throughout the war.

When the American invasion began, is when the Germans were forced to resupply the western front this making them lose resources in their eastern conquest. The Germans were less then 100 miles from moscow. The Soviets were getting their crap pushed back in.