More liberal hipocrisy

[slimreaper]

In the latest example of liberal hipocrisy we talk about profiling and how a select few ruin it for the majority. Ex: liberals denounce police profiling of minorities(though it's proven the poor commit more crimes) as a few bad eggs shouldn't ruin it for a larger populace. On the other hand, they make the argument that a select few crazy people with guns ruin it for the vast majority of gun owners who never shoot anyone. Liberal hipocrisy at its finest.

 

[Chibiusa]

Americans and their obsession with guns

 

[slimreaper]

Americans and their obsession with guns

It's what puts us above everyone else. Invading the mainland in america is nearly impossible because largest amounts of citizens are armed. The same can't be said for europe or china

 

[Unbiased]

Americans and their obsession with guns

Without the USA the world would be speaking German or Japanese. Guns are a big part because the world is too pathetic to protect itself

 

[~Naruto&Itachi~]

Without the USA the world would be speaking German or Japanese. Guns are a big part because the world is too pathetic to protect itself

how come??

 

[slimreaper]

how come??

France and Britain had already pretty much lost WW2 before we stepped in. It would have been Russia vs the combined Axis powers if a fresh America didn't step in

 

[Unbiased]

how come??

Essentially Japan was imperialist until 70 years ago and the Germans were pissed from the treaty of Versailles.

 

[~Naruto&Itachi~]

France and Britain had already pretty much lost WW2 before we stepped in. It would have been Russia vs the combined Axis powers if a fresh America didn't step in

WW2 wouldn't have really happened if US hadn't saved them in WW1 heck even if they had saved them in WW1 but if had not blamed Germany for WW1 and held massively responsible for it WW2 could have been dodged.....not to mention germany weren't to be blamed for WW1....but it's not her nor there....

 

[Rokudaime Hokage Naruto]

In the latest example of liberal hipocrisy we talk about profiling and how a select few ruin it for the majority. Ex: liberals denounce police profiling of minorities(though it's proven the poor commit more crimes) as a few bad eggs shouldn't ruin it for a larger populace. On the other hand, they make the argument that a select few crazy people with guns ruin it for the vast majority of gun owners who never shoot anyone. Liberal hipocrisy at its finest.

You talk like hypocrisy is necessarily always a bad thing...

Different situations and circumstances call for different solutions. There is no general theory of how to do everything correctly.

We can only use rational judgement to determine our course of action/things we argue for and because of this we cannot avoid hypocrisy and in fact it would be counterproductive to do so.

edit:

It's what puts us above everyone else. Invading the mainland in america is nearly impossible because largest amounts of citizens are armed. The same can't be said for europe or china

I loled so hard at this.

 

[Punk Hazard]

So you think anyone should just be able to buy any gun whenever they want?

 

[slimreaper]

So you think anyone should just be able to buy any gun whenever they want?

21 and up sure. My only hang up would be convicted voilent criminals

 

[Punk Hazard]

21 and up sure. My only hang up would be convicted voilent criminals

So, no background checks, no waiting period, no restraint or restrictions on gun types?

 

[slimreaper]

So, no background checks, no waiting period, no restraint or restrictions on gun types?

Obviously if I support not giving guns to convicted violent criminals then I support back ground checks to an extent. Fack no to a waiting period, and fack no to restricting the types of guns the people can fight a tyrannical govt with

 

[Ripple Hole]

Obviously if I support not giving guns to convicted violent criminals then I support back ground checks to an extent. Fack no to a waiting period, and dack no to restricting the types of guns the people can fight a tyrannical govt with

Wat .-.

 

[slimreaper]

Wat .-.

What is your question?

 

[Rokudaime Hokage Naruto]

Obviously if I support not giving guns to convicted violent criminals then I support back ground checks to an extent. Fack no to a waiting period, and fack no to restricting the types of guns the people can fight a tyrannical govt with

This ^ right here, is why no country in the world is a true democracy. Because most inhabitants are really really dumb.

 

[Fresco]

Yep that AR-15 is really going to help against a government that spends more on their military than the next 10 combined :lol

 

[slimreaper]

This ^ right here, is why no country in the world is a true democracy. Because most inhabitants are really really dumb.

You hold yourself above others like most liberals without any reasoning supporting you. The arrogance of the left

 

[slimreaper]

Yep that AR-15 is really going to help against a government that spends more on their military than the next 10 combined :lol

With the world's current war laws, america is unable to win a guerilla war... especially against it's own people. The citizens would win

 

[UchiGod Itachi]

The gun control most liberals speak of are the gunshow loop-holes that the NRA & Gun Manufactures sets up , this is reason why most felons get a hold on guns in heavily poverty neighborhoods in the first place.(Check the video)

[video=youtube;PIFiJdw0uME]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIFiJdw0uME[/video]

See this video a 13 yr old kid was able to buy a fire-arm thanks to the loopholes NRA & Gun Manufactures set up, i bet you if he was to shoot up the place the NRA would turn around and say well if you had a gun you be able to stop him knowing good well it was NRA loopholes that got him the gun in the first place.

Word of the day Paradox.