- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 4,680
- Reaction score
- 409
nice job .....
Stop avoiding the question.
Just answer, what's the difference?
(BTW, I think you need a dictionary because you don't know what slander means)
You're using a quote involving me, completely out of context if read from an improper point of view. It also makes it seem like I'm on the levels of Madara Rules. It's slander.
I'm not avoiding the question. I've stated the difference multiple times. It's not my prerogative if you're too lazy to check.
That's not slander. Look up the definition of slander and educate yourself please.
I see no definitive answer, because you don't have one. I already knew I was right, but it's just sad to verify it this way.
You clearly don't know what slander is:
Definition of SLANDER
: to utter slander against : defame
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of DEFAME
1
archaic : disgrace
2
: to harm the reputation of by libel or slander
3
archaic : accuse
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of LIBEL
1
a : a written statement in which a plaintiff in certain courts sets forth the cause of action or the relief sought
b archaic : a handbill especially attacking or defaming someone
2
a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression
b (1) : a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt (2) : defamation of a person by written or representational means (3) : the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures (4) : the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel
Educate yourself fool.
:| You can claim victory all you want. All this proves is you're too lazy to scroll up the page just to see what I defined the two as. Or even go to OP and check. Why do I have to retype it?
Do you realize you just proved yourself wrong?
Slander: Spoken words against someone that are FALSE
Libel: Written words against someone that are FALSE
I have done neither. The signature stays.
Okay, I read your entire thread. Still didn't see it. Can you break it down real fast for my tiny brain please?
1. a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression
Are you an actual idiot or are you trolling?
2. What are you requesting me to answer. I don't understand your question if you can't find it.(I will respond in the morning)
Sorry but I disagree
I read what you've been saying, & you say that mokuton abilities are basically the ability to grow trees. You also said that if a ninja were to spawn a fireball in their hand that it would not be ninjutsu.
So all in all, you're saying that no handsigns = no ninjutsu, well if thats the case then explain this please:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
So as you can see from the scan, kakashi just "spawned" lightning, no handsigns or chakra molding needed. Does this mean that kakashi has a raiton ability, or just plain old raiton jutsus? Ill continue...
Nagato has the ability to manipulate attraction & repulsion, does that make shinra tensei & bansho tennin non-ninjutsu as well? Nagato uses no handsigns to perform them & you said that abilities =/= ninjutsu. So going by your logic then nagato only has 1 jutsu from deva path, which is CBT. Kakashi said that he has the ability to manipulate attractive forces, so why do his abilities = jutsu when obito manipulating mokuton isnt?
Its beyond me![]()
it doesn't matter regardless, because I have done neither. This is slander:
"Michael Jackson used to rape children and does loads of illegal drugs!"
Libel is when it is written. That's how the legal system views it. I took a class that went over these things, please don't try to argue this point with me as you are wrong and it is off topic.
Answer this question:
What is the difference between Obito turning his arm into a tree and Yamato turning his arm into a tree?