Mass Shooting in Texas leaves 10 people dead

[Aim64C]

The solution to school shootings is very simple, and will be slowly revealed as time goes on.

This school shooting was anticipated and prepared for, it is why the shooter(s) were captured alive. Interesting how quickly the stories of living school shooters disappears from the media.
Per their training, they are supposed to kill themselves prior to capture at the end of an operation. Candidates are selected from a number of people pre-disposed to certain psychiatric disorders and are then treated using drugs and physical stimuli. This treatment is designed to create a compartmentalized mindset that can be triggered by re-introduction of triggering stimuli. This state of mind can be made very open to suggestion.

The ones captured alive... what do they always report? Voices in their heads. From the club shooter to the school shooters, they all report hearing voices in their heads. Using certain bands of the microwave spectrum and modulating pulse width, certain people can detect audible signals (can this be done via cellular phone?). What did Nassim's father specialize in?

After the Mullahs were installed as the power seats in Iran, via the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran was converted into a limited hangout operation for the CIA. A number of programs, to include MK_Ultra, were transfered into Iran where human rights abuses and other such things would draw less attention or be attributed to Iran's governing system.

Nassim was, perhaps, one of the first subjects of the program that has been referred to as "Orion." Her behavioral trends are indicative of ritualistic abuse. Notably, she vehemently despised **** *** and felt the need to speak against it with curious frequency. Women are generally less susceptible to this type of strategy than men (women are less prone to things like schizophrenia to begin with), but it can still be applied.

Break up Orion, get MS-13 out of the streets, and wall off Chicago to declare it abandoned wilderness - and violent crime will almost disappear from the U.S. - not to mention firearm related attacks.

Anyone ever question where a 17 year old got explosives from?

 

[Lightbringer]

The solution to school shootings is very simple, and will be slowly revealed as time goes on.

This school shooting was anticipated and prepared for, it is why the shooter(s) were captured alive. Interesting how quickly the stories of living school shooters disappears from the media.
Per their training, they are supposed to kill themselves prior to capture at the end of an operation. Candidates are selected from a number of people pre-disposed to certain psychiatric disorders and are then treated using drugs and physical stimuli. This treatment is designed to create a compartmentalized mindset that can be triggered by re-introduction of triggering stimuli. This state of mind can be made very open to suggestion.

The ones captured alive... what do they always report? Voices in their heads. From the club shooter to the school shooters, they all report hearing voices in their heads. Using certain bands of the microwave spectrum and modulating pulse width, certain people can detect audible signals (can this be done via cellular phone?). What did Nassim's father specialize in?

After the Mullahs were installed as the power seats in Iran, via the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran was converted into a limited hangout operation for the CIA. A number of programs, to include MK_Ultra, were transfered into Iran where human rights abuses and other such things would draw less attention or be attributed to Iran's governing system.

Nassim was, perhaps, one of the first subjects of the program that has been referred to as "Orion." Her behavioral trends are indicative of ritualistic abuse. Notably, she vehemently despised **** *** and felt the need to speak against it with curious frequency. Women are generally less susceptible to this type of strategy than men (women are less prone to things like schizophrenia to begin with), but it can still be applied.

Break up Orion, get MS-13 out of the streets, and wall off Chicago to declare it abandoned wilderness - and violent crime will almost disappear from the U.S. - not to mention firearm related attacks.

Anyone ever question where a 17 year old got explosives from?

Wow.....you watch too much Infowars.

 

[Fountain]

Wow.....you watch too much Infowars.

You watch too much CNN.

 

[Lightbringer]

You watch too much CNN.

Classic Fountain salt. Lmao.

 

[Aim64C]

Wow.....you watch too much Infowars.

Never watched it.

If you look it up, you'll find that Nassim's father was a microwave and audio electronics engineer - microwave and ultrasound amplifiers, to be specific.

MK_Ultra was a real program that caught some flack once it was exposed, and involved the use of drugs and physical/auditory stimulation. It was officially shut down, but this was also right around the time the Mullahs took over control in Persia to become what we understand as modern day Iran. To understand all of this, we actually have to go back to the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood and the CIA as the OSS and how that all worked in with the British intelligence services. There's a reason certain elements of our government refer to the CIA as Clowns In America. The British intelligence service is called the circus and its operatives clowns.

Infowars is a controlled opposition piece. Sometimes they are on point, but they are generally just there to serve as Zion in the Matrix. No one truly leaves the Matrix. You just decide whether or not you're going to challenge the system you know. There is, still, no spoon.

 

[Onii Chan]

I love the assertion that I'm wrong and that I listen to CNN. Yet here's a reality check for you. In the wake the Orlando shooting in 2016, there was a proposal made to prohibit suspected terrorists from buying guns and it was blocked by a Republican led senate. So again, you are wrong.

You must be registered for see links

There are countless videos that also show people proving how easy it is to get a gun at a gun show.

Here is a recent one from three weeks ago where a congress candidate/army vet is exposing the gun show loophole.

You must be registered for see links

except the irony is that his a veteran

 

[Lightbringer]

except the irony is that his a veteran

I love the non-response deflection.

How is that irony?

 

[Fountain]

Never watched it.

If you look it up, you'll find that Nassim's father was a microwave and audio electronics engineer - microwave and ultrasound amplifiers, to be specific.

MK_Ultra was a real program that caught some flack once it was exposed, and involved the use of drugs and physical/auditory stimulation. It was officially shut down, but this was also right around the time the Mullahs took over control in Persia to become what we understand as modern day Iran. To understand all of this, we actually have to go back to the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood and the CIA as the OSS and how that all worked in with the British intelligence services. There's a reason certain elements of our government refer to the CIA as Clowns In America. The British intelligence service is called the circus and its operatives clowns.

Infowars is a controlled opposition piece. Sometimes they are on point, but they are generally just there to serve as Zion in the Matrix. No one truly leaves the Matrix. You just decide whether or not you're going to challenge the system you know. There is, still, no spoon.

That's really interesting. I was watching a video recently about how they're able to kill and drive people crazy by stimulating a part of their brain with low frequency microwaves, and how there has been people who have eyewitnessed black cars and helicopters before feeling ill. It's really scary stuff.

 

[Aim64C]

I love the non-response deflection.

How is that irony?

You must be registered for see links

" In other words, there two major obstacles to the gun show loophole are that most inventory – new and used – is in the hands of licensed dealers, and licensed dealers have to run a background check every time they sell a gun. Furthermore, most people are not going to risk their livelihood on the chance of making a few dollars in a dingy convention hall when following the rules results in the same profits and only takes a few more minutes. "

You must be registered for see links

"The 40 percent figure that Mr. Obama and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, cite so frequently comes from a 1997 Justice Department survey. A closer look at that 40 percent number reveals it includes 29 percent of gun owners who said they got their guns from family members or friends and acquaintances.

That leaves 11 percent of firearms obtained through unfamiliar people. Of these, 3 percent reported they got their firearms “through the mail,” a process that requires a background check from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Four percent said “other,” and 4 percent made their purchase at a gun show.

The “gun-show loophole” is an exaggeration designed to foster the false impression that this is how the bad guys acquire firearms. A 2001 Justice Department survey found 0.7 percent of state and federal prison inmates bought their weapons at a gun show.

Gun shows aren’t the equivalent of the Wild West. The vast majority of vendors at the shows are fully licensed dealers who must run the FBI check at the time of sale. What the gun grabbers are really after are transactions between private individuals trading or selling their personal property. "

 

[minamoto]

You must be registered for see links

" In other words, there two major obstacles to the gun show loophole are that most inventory – new and used – is in the hands of licensed dealers, and licensed dealers have to run a background check every time they sell a gun. Furthermore, most people are not going to risk their livelihood on the chance of making a few dollars in a dingy convention hall when following the rules results in the same profits and only takes a few more minutes. "

You must be registered for see links

"The 40 percent figure that Mr. Obama and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, cite so frequently comes from a 1997 Justice Department survey. A closer look at that 40 percent number reveals it includes 29 percent of gun owners who said they got their guns from family members or friends and acquaintances.

That leaves 11 percent of firearms obtained through unfamiliar people. Of these, 3 percent reported they got their firearms “through the mail,” a process that requires a background check from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Four percent said “other,” and 4 percent made their purchase at a gun show.

The “gun-show loophole” is an exaggeration designed to foster the false impression that this is how the bad guys acquire firearms. A 2001 Justice Department survey found 0.7 percent of state and federal prison inmates bought their weapons at a gun show.

Gun shows aren’t the equivalent of the Wild West. The vast majority of vendors at the shows are fully licensed dealers who must run the FBI check at the time of sale. What the gun grabbers are really after are transactions between private individuals trading or selling their personal property. "

You must be registered for see images

 

[Lightbringer]

You must be registered for see links

" In other words, there two major obstacles to the gun show loophole are that most inventory – new and used – is in the hands of licensed dealers, and licensed dealers have to run a background check every time they sell a gun. Furthermore, most people are not going to risk their livelihood on the chance of making a few dollars in a dingy convention hall when following the rules results in the same profits and only takes a few more minutes. "

You must be registered for see links

"The 40 percent figure that Mr. Obama and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, cite so frequently comes from a 1997 Justice Department survey. A closer look at that 40 percent number reveals it includes 29 percent of gun owners who said they got their guns from family members or friends and acquaintances.

That leaves 11 percent of firearms obtained through unfamiliar people. Of these, 3 percent reported they got their firearms “through the mail,” a process that requires a background check from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Four percent said “other,” and 4 percent made their purchase at a gun show.

The “gun-show loophole” is an exaggeration designed to foster the false impression that this is how the bad guys acquire firearms. A 2001 Justice Department survey found 0.7 percent of state and federal prison inmates bought their weapons at a gun show.

Gun shows aren’t the equivalent of the Wild West. The vast majority of vendors at the shows are fully licensed dealers who must run the FBI check at the time of sale. What the gun grabbers are really after are transactions between private individuals trading or selling their personal property. "

Explain to me how this debunks anything I said? Because it doesn't.

I'm well aware that most illegally bought guns are bought through acquaintances and family members. If anything, you're just supporting my argument about gun laws in the U.S.

 

[Aim64C]

That's really interesting. I was watching a video recently about how they're able to kill and drive people crazy by stimulating a part of their brain with low frequency microwaves, and how there has been people who have eyewitnessed black cars and helicopters before feeling ill. It's really scary stuff.

I don't have any specific information on being able to use it on the general population. While, certainly, such a triggering mechanism could have adverse effects on the general public, it would not be expected to have the same impact on people who have not been subjected to altered states and conditioning, as well as people who are not prone to certain mental health issues.

It is noteworthy that this most recent school attack came on a Friday as a major inside government source was indicating a coming round of bad news for the global power establishment. On this platform, I do not have the screen caps, but what did break on Friday was that several senior members of Obama's administration have been indicted and/or there are now professional claims that those individuals are going to face criminal charges and need to seek lawyers.

That is bad, but what is coming is in relation to the DOJ and the Mueller report. When those are reviewed by Congress and the push made to declassify them, heads are going to roll. The FBI implanted double-agents into the Trump campaign and then later used their activities with Russia (under the FBI) as evidence in front of the FISA court. Page, Manafort, Flynn - these were all our spies against Russia. Papapotomus was the DNC plant used to trigger Crossfire-Hurricane, the FBI operation to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

This sounds pretty bad, but when you get into who these characters were illegally conspiring with in relation to foreign powers, and why - then we run down an entire rabbit hole of disclosure. If we want - we can chase that rabbit all the way back to humanity's origins and the secret societies related to them, but most will probably never venture that far. Question... why is Lilith (owl) the personal guardian of the Pope? Where did the other people of the world come from, those not descended from Cain and Abel? How prescient was Neon Genesis: Evangelion?

Now, that is just a sort of chew toy for the mind. It's not really meant to be a serious thrust at unraveling origins. That is a subject that has been rather deliberately distorted over the eons as ruling authorities have changed territories and burned records. However, the ancients have a theme among their origin stories that is rather interesting, taken into context with the very intimate story we have from the Hebrew tribes.... or... people we associate with the hebrews, today. If humanity originated far closer to Yugoslavia, as recent archeology would suggest, then we might have to rethink much of the 20th century.... and why Japan is such a curious and important cultural preserve. Being associated with the Third Reich so closely and their language being what it is... it's very easy for the Japanese to hide things in plain sight from the global power structure, which has an extreme difficulty properly translating their written language. How can you ensure certain records have been destroyed? Were certain powers within the U.S. aware of the threat and acted to obstruct record purges?

Why is Japan so prolific, despite being a very isolationist nation... why was much of its media originally imported via underground channels? Why does the popularity of anime represent an outright revolt against western media establishments?



The Yellow Dragon Empress, Satsuki Kiryuin, Lady Amaterasu, herself - has been leading the charge.

 

[Aim64C]

Explain to me how this debunks anything I said? Because it doesn't.

Yes, it does.

I'm well aware that most illegally bought guns are bought through acquaintances and family members. If anything, you're just supporting my argument about gun laws in the U.S.

Private sales are not illegal sales. The exchange of private property is the exchange of private property. If I were to sell my neighbor my video games, they are not illegal sales simply because I did not go through a licensed retailer. The same applies to vehicle sales, cutlery sales, machinery, etc.

Let's look at where criminals actually get their firearms from, however:

You must be registered for see links

" Sixty percent of the primary guns were acquired by purchase,
usually for cash though in some cases as a trade or a mixed arrangement.
For example, R51 acquired a gun from a man he met at a party;
the price included both cash and a PlayStation. Other deals involved
drugs and cash, or, in one case, an even swap on two guns. Table 3
indicates the other types of transactions. Only two Rs indicated that
they had stolen their primary gun, a surprisingly rare event — but in
line with the results of the federal inmate surveys reported above.
The importance of social networks in arranging gun transactions is
enhanced by the fact that a substantial minority of transactions is not
limited to an exchange of a gun for money or something else, but rather
reflect or require an ongoing relationship. Included in this category are
transactions that are reported as gifts, or that are characterized as
“sharing” or “borrowing.” The “gift” relationship includes several
reports where family or gang associates provided the respondent with
a gun after his release from jail or prison. R34, a gang member, indicated
that “the older guys” would pass out guns when the situation on the
street got tense.
In two cases, R reported holding a gun for a friend for a few hours
while the friend attended to business for which he did not want to be
armed. But R13 reported holding a friend's gun for more than a month
after the friend's father found the gun and threatened to confiscate it.
It also appears that gun sharing is standard practice in some gangs.
R25 estimated that there were four guns in the neighborhood for 15
guys in the gang. Others mentioned that while they did not own a gun
themselves, they hung out with guys who had guns and would share
as needed. One mentioned that he shared with family members. "

...

Spoiler

" In this paper we explored how dangerous offenders do obtain
their guns, reporting the results of both federal surveys of nationally
representative samples of prison inmates, and also the results of a
new survey of Cook County Jail. The CCJ survey results are generally in
line with the earlier federal surveys for items where they can be directly
compared: it is rare for offenders to buy from licensed dealers, and also
rare for them to steal their guns. Rather, the predominant sources of
guns to offenders are family, acquaintances, fellow gang members —
which is to say, members of their social network (Papachristos and
Wildeman, 2013). The CCJ survey makes it clear that where offenders'
immediate connections are not able to provide them with a gun, they
often turn to sources by which they are linked through a mutual
acquaintance. A strong motivator for this degree of caution in Chicago
is a concern, especially on the part of the sellers, that the other party
to the transaction will report it to the police — or that they are the police,
working undercover.
Another finding from the CCJ survey (and not investigated in the
federal surveys) is that guns tend to turn over rapidly in the underground
market. Many of the respondents have been in possession of
several guns during the six months prior to the current incarceration,
under a variety of circumstances and types of transactions. The frequency
of transactions and high turnover suggests that an effective disruption
of transactions might have an immediate effect on gun use in
crime, and that the impact of such efforts would grow over the course
of a year. Thus a supply-side approach to disarming offenders does not
necessarily require great patience.
The “players” in the local underground gun market include some
who do enough selling to be identified as “point sources” of guns
(Cook and Braga, 2001). None of our respondents operated on a large
scale, but there were reports of transacting on both sides of the market,
playing the roles of retailer or broker. It is also clear that the gangs
played some role, sometimes buying “crates” of guns from outside the
city and distributing them to members. Several respondents reported
dealing with traffickers who were bringing guns into Chicago. But for
the most part even these transactions involved prior connections. "

Criminals do not wander into gun shows to buy firearms they are going to use in a crime. Criminals do not buy firearms from people they do not know, and in many cases, are not conducting transactions on a cash basis. Firearms are traded or lent among social groups whose lifestyle involves a large amount of crime in the first place. Gangs pass out firearms to their crews when violence or competition ticks up, and they source their firearms through illicit distribution networks. The people who steal firearms rarely turn around and use them in crime (more than likely, theft of firearms is simply the motivation for most thefts - money - and these distribution networks source a large number of their firearms from hot sales).

Firearms used in crime are rarely brand new, and are often fairly old, having been passed around on the street multiple times. While these transactions are not necessarily illegal beyond the distribution network which falls under Federal jurisdiction as a distributor requiring a license - the more pertinent take-away is that this is an entirely different culture that is using firearms in this manner. These are not people going to gun shows, purchasing firearms from the store, etc. These are people who are a immersed in an entirely different lifestyle from the outset. Whether given guns or gumballs, they will use those in a manner completely different from how the average citizen uses them.

It would, therefor, be more sensible to address the cultural problem as opposed to the firearms used by the average person in an average way.

Unless you think gangs are suddenly going to start filling out background checks when they hand out guns to their crew because the politicians wrote a piece of paper saying that they should.

 

[minamoto]

Yes, it does.



Private sales are not illegal sales. The exchange of private property is the exchange of private property. If I were to sell my neighbor my video games, they are not illegal sales simply because I did not go through a licensed retailer. The same applies to vehicle sales, cutlery sales, machinery, etc.

Let's look at where criminals actually get their firearms from, however:

You must be registered for see links

" Sixty percent of the primary guns were acquired by purchase,
usually for cash though in some cases as a trade or a mixed arrangement.
For example, R51 acquired a gun from a man he met at a party;
the price included both cash and a PlayStation. Other deals involved
drugs and cash, or, in one case, an even swap on two guns. Table 3
indicates the other types of transactions. Only two Rs indicated that
they had stolen their primary gun, a surprisingly rare event — but in
line with the results of the federal inmate surveys reported above.
The importance of social networks in arranging gun transactions is
enhanced by the fact that a substantial minority of transactions is not
limited to an exchange of a gun for money or something else, but rather
reflect or require an ongoing relationship. Included in this category are
transactions that are reported as gifts, or that are characterized as
“sharing” or “borrowing.” The “gift” relationship includes several
reports where family or gang associates provided the respondent with
a gun after his release from jail or prison. R34, a gang member, indicated
that “the older guys” would pass out guns when the situation on the
street got tense.
In two cases, R reported holding a gun for a friend for a few hours
while the friend attended to business for which he did not want to be
armed. But R13 reported holding a friend's gun for more than a month
after the friend's father found the gun and threatened to confiscate it.
It also appears that gun sharing is standard practice in some gangs.
R25 estimated that there were four guns in the neighborhood for 15
guys in the gang. Others mentioned that while they did not own a gun
themselves, they hung out with guys who had guns and would share
as needed. One mentioned that he shared with family members. "

...

Spoiler

" In this paper we explored how dangerous offenders do obtain
their guns, reporting the results of both federal surveys of nationally
representative samples of prison inmates, and also the results of a
new survey of Cook County Jail. The CCJ survey results are generally in
line with the earlier federal surveys for items where they can be directly
compared: it is rare for offenders to buy from licensed dealers, and also
rare for them to steal their guns. Rather, the predominant sources of
guns to offenders are family, acquaintances, fellow gang members —
which is to say, members of their social network (Papachristos and
Wildeman, 2013). The CCJ survey makes it clear that where offenders'
immediate connections are not able to provide them with a gun, they
often turn to sources by which they are linked through a mutual
acquaintance. A strong motivator for this degree of caution in Chicago
is a concern, especially on the part of the sellers, that the other party
to the transaction will report it to the police — or that they are the police,
working undercover.
Another finding from the CCJ survey (and not investigated in the
federal surveys) is that guns tend to turn over rapidly in the underground
market. Many of the respondents have been in possession of
several guns during the six months prior to the current incarceration,
under a variety of circumstances and types of transactions. The frequency
of transactions and high turnover suggests that an effective disruption
of transactions might have an immediate effect on gun use in
crime, and that the impact of such efforts would grow over the course
of a year. Thus a supply-side approach to disarming offenders does not
necessarily require great patience.
The “players” in the local underground gun market include some
who do enough selling to be identified as “point sources” of guns
(Cook and Braga, 2001). None of our respondents operated on a large
scale, but there were reports of transacting on both sides of the market,
playing the roles of retailer or broker. It is also clear that the gangs
played some role, sometimes buying “crates” of guns from outside the
city and distributing them to members. Several respondents reported
dealing with traffickers who were bringing guns into Chicago. But for
the most part even these transactions involved prior connections. "

Criminals do not wander into gun shows to buy firearms they are going to use in a crime. Criminals do not buy firearms from people they do not know, and in many cases, are not conducting transactions on a cash basis. Firearms are traded or lent among social groups whose lifestyle involves a large amount of crime in the first place. Gangs pass out firearms to their crews when violence or competition ticks up, and they source their firearms through illicit distribution networks. The people who steal firearms rarely turn around and use them in crime (more than likely, theft of firearms is simply the motivation for most thefts - money - and these distribution networks source a large number of their firearms from hot sales).

Firearms used in crime are rarely brand new, and are often fairly old, having been passed around on the street multiple times. While these transactions are not necessarily illegal beyond the distribution network which falls under Federal jurisdiction as a distributor requiring a license - the more pertinent take-away is that this is an entirely different culture that is using firearms in this manner. These are not people going to gun shows, purchasing firearms from the store, etc. These are people who are a immersed in an entirely different lifestyle from the outset. Whether given guns or gumballs, they will use those in a manner completely different from how the average citizen uses them.

It would, therefor, be more sensible to address the cultural problem as opposed to the firearms used by the average person in an average way.

Unless you think gangs are suddenly going to start filling out background checks when they hand out guns to their crew because the politicians wrote a piece of paper saying that they should.

sum up a idea for god of sake..

 

[Aim64C]

sum up a idea for god of sake..

Some things in life require more than one sentence of ego-ejaculate.

 

[Lightbringer]

Some things in life require more than one sentence of ego-ejaculate.

No, what you're doing is simply sandwiching an argument with piles of text which can be summarized in a few sentences because most of what you write is vacuous of any meaning or substance.

 

[minamoto]

Some things in life require more than one sentence of ego-ejaculate.

i'm just trying to be nice with you and tell you teh truth...but u r acting like keyboard warrior...

 

[Aim64C]

No, what you're doing is simply sandwiching an argument with piles of text which can be summarized in a few sentences because most of what you write is vacuous of any meaning or substance.

i'm just trying to be nice with you and tell you teh truth...but u r acting like keyboard warrior...

Those who would petition to have the rights of others restricted, while refusing to read a mere page of text related to the grievances of doing so, should be shot.

 

[minamoto]

No, what you're doing is simply sandwiching an argument with piles of text which can be summarized in a few sentences because most of what you write is vacuous of any meaning or substance.

also all he does is copy past wikepedia and other internet pages....plz tell me what debate is about znd i'll solo him in front of ur eyes...

 

[minamoto]

Those who would petition to have the rights of others restricted, while refusing to read a mere page of text related to the grievances of doing so, should be shot.

those who are lazy ass and cant sum up teh wikepdia pages they copy past to us Should be treated like low IQ memberz..