You see... this is what you don't understand:
You must be registered for see links
Do note the date.
Useful theories and perspectives can predict, to a certain degree, events. That is the ultimate test of a model within science/physics. "So... nice mathematical proofs. What can you actually do with them?"
Saying: "Hinata is Fodder" has, currently, been unable to perform even the most rudimentary of predictions accurately.
You didn't know I was being serious. You were accepting an opinion that agreed with something you already believed to be true.
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice Doggie" until you find a big enough rock. A lack of politeness does not indicate desperation.
Though I will admit that I erred. I said "you're stupid." Which was deliberately meant to be obtuse. If you peruse my response to others, you will find that I am more than capable of creating allegories to that same sentiment. All the same - I erred.
"You are" implies an intrinsic characteristic. What I should have used was: "You are being." It is an important distinction between one's self and one's behavior.
That said - I tend to insult people when I feel like insulting people. It's a whimsical decision. Sometimes I feel like being the soothsaying wise-man.
The problem with your standpoint, however - and why I was quick to insult you - is that you didn't address any of the points of the theory (as rudimentary and off-the-cuff as it was).
"That's stupid and it's never going to happen."
"Okay, well you're obviously not participating in meaningful conversation. What about that is stupid and why couldn't it happen?"
I can line out character relationships and use those to predict future character interactions as well as some rudimentary plot constructs. Obviously, there are limitations with predicting the work of any author - but I can clearly lay out for you the concepts Kishimoto has used to model many of his characters, clans, and plot points around.
If you're going to tell me that it's not going to happen and call it fanfiction - then you leave me with no other conclusion than you're unwilling or incapable of analytical thinking and constructive debate. Which, bluntly, means you're being stupid and acting in an affront to the very concept of sentience.
You must be registered for see images