Re: George Zimmerman found not guilty
Further, you can't say what Zimmerman should or should not have done. Convicting him of manslaughter or murder for getting out of his car is just unreasonable. Under that logic - if I go outside to check a strange noise that I suspect is someone unauthorized being on my property, I am guilty of manslaughter (negligence) if a confrontation ensues where bodily harm befalls another person (regardless of that person's actions, intent, etc).
I'm sorry, that's called "stupid."
Quite honestly - I say to give them blood. Have a couple AC-130s do a strafing run with 35mm HE and 45mm grenades down the streets infested with these rioters.
Rinse. Lather. Repeat. Until you've cut the need for welfare funding by about 40% and you've eliminated most of the people retarded enough to cluster up all nice and pretty for area-effect weapons while destroying the property of citizens and each other because their mob opinion didn't influence the court system.
I know you all are going to say I'm a horrible person, but I assure you that the world will be a better place for it.
Zimmerman broke no laws. The prosecution had no evidence that really even suggested Zimmerman was the aggressor in this case. They had a theory - which was only supported by their delusional idea that Zimmerman would be unable to draw his weapon from the type of holster he had under the described conditions (not only is it possible - the ballistics pretty much confirm that the handgun was fired at an angle nearly perpendicular to Zimmerman's facing at roughly 3 inches).
Other than that - they had nothing but emotion to go on. Which was why they picked a melodramatic attorney to begin with.
Not all courts are the same, not all cases are the same. I can't really comment on the case you're referencing without a specific case to look at.
This is one of the incidents, however, where the system worked as it was supposed to. The burden of proof was on the prosecution. They didn't have evidence for the conviction they were going for. They -might- have had a case for manslaughter - but even then, it would have been a very tough case; as 911 dispatch has zero legal authority over the phone (only a uniformed officer in your physical presence really has the legal authority to be issuing commands.... and in most cases it's not a crime to completely ignore those commands unless they are part of an attempt to arrest you).
They would have to prove Zimmerman negligent for a manslaughter case - and there's really no evidence even for that.
They were hoping the Jury would be more vindictive than they were, and that a manslaughter charge would come out of it through deliberations as a compromise.
But their case was just pathetic. I would actually audit their department for fraud and waste. How many stronger cases for drug distribution charges have been submitted by investigating officers and the prosecuting attorney's office passed on, to take up cases like this that are shaky at best and end up being publicized shenanigans?
Instead, he decided to evade Zimmerman and then initiate a surprise confrontation.
That's what all of his texts on his phone were about. That's what his pictures on various social networking sites were about. That's the crowd of people he hung out with.
There is no evidence that Zimmerman followed Trayvon any differently than one who simply wanted to ask a question.
He was simply foolish enough to naturally select himself for elimination. There were 500 more who were born just like him in the span of his trial who will fill the gap left by his departure. Your tax dollars are already hard at work repairing the damage done to social decay.
On second thoughts. I'll fiddle. Let the riots burn your streets and slaughter your children. You've wet your own damned bed. The stupid people who enabled the problems will be killed by the immediate problem - and then the stupid people that are part of the problem will have destroyed the system that enables their existence.
I really don't see the down side to this, here.
Never mind. The riots will end up being a just thing. What's good for the gander is rarely good for the goose.
Hun, I could kill most adult males twice my size in a hand-to-hand fight at a similar (slightly lighter) build to Trayvon.
Further, you can't say what Zimmerman should or should not have done. Convicting him of manslaughter or murder for getting out of his car is just unreasonable. Under that logic - if I go outside to check a strange noise that I suspect is someone unauthorized being on my property, I am guilty of manslaughter (negligence) if a confrontation ensues where bodily harm befalls another person (regardless of that person's actions, intent, etc).
I'm sorry, that's called "stupid."
They don't want justice. They want blood.
Quite honestly - I say to give them blood. Have a couple AC-130s do a strafing run with 35mm HE and 45mm grenades down the streets infested with these rioters.
Rinse. Lather. Repeat. Until you've cut the need for welfare funding by about 40% and you've eliminated most of the people retarded enough to cluster up all nice and pretty for area-effect weapons while destroying the property of citizens and each other because their mob opinion didn't influence the court system.
I know you all are going to say I'm a horrible person, but I assure you that the world will be a better place for it.
No, the legal system is not ****ed up. Innocent until proven guilty.
Zimmerman broke no laws. The prosecution had no evidence that really even suggested Zimmerman was the aggressor in this case. They had a theory - which was only supported by their delusional idea that Zimmerman would be unable to draw his weapon from the type of holster he had under the described conditions (not only is it possible - the ballistics pretty much confirm that the handgun was fired at an angle nearly perpendicular to Zimmerman's facing at roughly 3 inches).
Other than that - they had nothing but emotion to go on. Which was why they picked a melodramatic attorney to begin with.
Not all courts are the same, not all cases are the same. I can't really comment on the case you're referencing without a specific case to look at.
This is one of the incidents, however, where the system worked as it was supposed to. The burden of proof was on the prosecution. They didn't have evidence for the conviction they were going for. They -might- have had a case for manslaughter - but even then, it would have been a very tough case; as 911 dispatch has zero legal authority over the phone (only a uniformed officer in your physical presence really has the legal authority to be issuing commands.... and in most cases it's not a crime to completely ignore those commands unless they are part of an attempt to arrest you).
They would have to prove Zimmerman negligent for a manslaughter case - and there's really no evidence even for that.
They were hoping the Jury would be more vindictive than they were, and that a manslaughter charge would come out of it through deliberations as a compromise.
But their case was just pathetic. I would actually audit their department for fraud and waste. How many stronger cases for drug distribution charges have been submitted by investigating officers and the prosecuting attorney's office passed on, to take up cases like this that are shaky at best and end up being publicized shenanigans?
Martin had 4 minutes to cross about 50 meters of suburb before he was 'home.'
Instead, he decided to evade Zimmerman and then initiate a surprise confrontation.
That's what all of his texts on his phone were about. That's what his pictures on various social networking sites were about. That's the crowd of people he hung out with.
There is no evidence that Zimmerman followed Trayvon any differently than one who simply wanted to ask a question.
And the world, bluntly, is better for it.
He was simply foolish enough to naturally select himself for elimination. There were 500 more who were born just like him in the span of his trial who will fill the gap left by his departure. Your tax dollars are already hard at work repairing the damage done to social decay.
On second thoughts. I'll fiddle. Let the riots burn your streets and slaughter your children. You've wet your own damned bed. The stupid people who enabled the problems will be killed by the immediate problem - and then the stupid people that are part of the problem will have destroyed the system that enables their existence.
I really don't see the down side to this, here.
Never mind. The riots will end up being a just thing. What's good for the gander is rarely good for the goose.
Last edited by a moderator:
