Funny Accurate video on "Native" Americans

[slimreaper]

[video=youtube;ZGK9KHUnaaQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGK9KHUnaaQ[/video]

The video's transcript for the bums not trying to watch it


Transcript:
It’s Thanksgiving! You know what that means. As you try and enjoy your downtime with your family, you’ll undoubtedly find a social justice warrior around your Thanksgiving table trying to force-feed you white guilt. Afterall, your ancestors commited genocide against the Indians. Sorry native Americans. Indigenous? Let’s just go with redskins.
Only one problem, most of it pure, unadulterated buffalo-feces.
Alright to preface this, yes, some of the settlers committed some heinous crimes that were inexcusable, and I’ve benefited from the privelege thereof, yada yada yada… but sooooome of the propoganda out there needs to be called out. Civilizations clash, that’s happened since the beginning of time. War sucks, but that doesn’t give teachers, leftists and social justice warriors the right to LIE about non-existent peaceful Native Americans who rode horses, never experienced war, painted with colors of the wind and were taken out by smallbox blankets. So before you dumbasses hang that dreamcatcher from your rearview mirror, hold your mouth because this tin can I’m about to kick just might hit you in the teeth. Let’s debunk some common PC thanksgiving myths.
MYTH: THE NATIVE AMERICANS WERE A PEACEFUL CULTURE TO WHOM THE CONCEPT OF WAR WAS FOREIGN
FACT: MANY WERE BRUTAL, CONQUERING ***HOLES
Native Americans warred with each other since, forever. Sometimes it was over hunting or farming grounds, sometimes revenge, sometimes to steal, sometimes to kill. I don’t say this to demonize them, they were no different than any other regressive, Neolithic cultures on other continents.
But the truth is that the only way settlers were able to conquer this land was through the help of Native Americans who teamed up with them to settle the score with the other, more assholish tribes. You think Cortes was able to conquer with only 500 Conquisadors. Course not, it took 50,000 ANGRY allied Native Americans who’d had it up to here with being enslaved and forced to carry gold for the other, Native Aztecs.
Some of of the Indian tribes were the most brutal in existence.
They practiced enslavement, rape, cannibalism, would sometimes target women and children, tribes like the Commanchees would butcher babies and roast people alive… and by the way, where do you think we LEARNED scalping?
MYTH: NATIVE AMERICANS WERE AN ADVANCED SOCIETY
TRUTH: NOT EVEN CLOSE
Smell that? It’s your sacred cow being torched. After I scalped her, of course. Unlike Rome, Greece, China, or pretty much any great empire which had already existed at that time, the Native Americans didn’t have advanced plumbing, transportation, mathematics or really… anything that led to the iphone on which you’re currently watching this. That whole beautiful “horseback Indian” culture you read about? It’s a lie because they hadn’t even domesticated horses. Not only that, but they didn’t even use the WHEEL. No really. 1400 AD… no wheel.
Even more reason that, when you’re that far behind, the clash of civilizations is going to be THAT much more drastic when the new wheel-using world catches up to you.
MYTH: THE SETTLERS DELIBERATELY INFECTED NATIVES WITH SMALLPOX BLANKETS TO WHIPE THEM OUT
TRUTH: ONLY IDIOTS COULD POSSIBLY BELIEVE THIS
Think about it. You really believe Europeans waged microbial, biological warfare… long before discovery, mass acceptance or even close to an understanding of advanced germ theory?
So it’s not true. You can look forever for historical accounts of mass smallpox blankets being pajamagrammed to the peaceful Indians, but you won’t find them. But there is SOME truth to the myth, which brings us to our final point.
MYTH: EUROPEANS COMMITTED MASS GENOCIDE. KILLING EVERY NATIVE AMERICAN FOR SPORT
TRUTH: NOT EVEN CLOSE
However, it is estimated that at high as 95% of pre-Columbian Native Americans were in fact killed off by disease, WHY? Because Europeans introduced new diseases to which the Native Americans hadn’t developed an immunity not only with THEMSELVES but now contact with animals like again HORSES which Native Americans hadn’t domesticated. Again, because they were such an archaic, unadvanced society.
Sure there were plenty of bloody, horrendous, unimaginable battles that occurred, and generally when it comes to neoloithic tribes and more advances settlers, the guys with the boom-boom sticks win. This isn’t exclusive to America or all that uncommon.
But Europeans were not hellbent on wiping out Native Americans, they were actually encouraged to bring the people into European culture and convert them to Christianity. Plus, inter-marrying was incredibly common. How else do you explain Johnny Depp, Angalina Jolie, Kid Cudi and even imaginary Elizabeth Warren claiming to be 1/16th Cherokee?
Killing people is bad. But so is milking, misleading and guilting all future generations for crimes they didn’t commit. Yep, Europeans conquered the Native Americans, created a Constitutional Republic, and advanced in mere centuries what Natives couldn’t do for thousands of years here on the plot of land that is America. So close this smartphone window, go enjoy your turkey and tell your social justice warrior cousin at the table to shut that mustached, single-origin-coffee drinking-hole. Or just… hand him a smallpox napkin.


TLDR: "Native" Americans weren't sweet innocent people who got abused by the Europeans like you've all been taught

 

[Madaras Arm]

2much 2 read tbh

 

[Arima]

Didn't watch, didn't read - too long.
Natives would not have died of diseases brought by Europeans, if Europeans stayed in Europe.

 

[Claymantan]

This man's vendetta against "leftists" and everything that isn't white, male, or brain-dead

The Trail of Tears didn't happen I guess

Disenfranchisement and exile didn't happen I guess

Regardless, the Europeans were an attacking and invading force, unless you wanna be like "Well WW1 was justified because all those countries had been in wars before"

This isn't even left-wing education, this is basic af education

(bowing out)

 

[slimreaper]

This man's vendetta against "leftists" and everything that isn't white, male, or brain-dead

The Trail of Tears didn't happen I guess

Disenfranchisement and exile didn't happen I guess

Regardless, the Europeans were an attacking and invading force, unless you wanna be like "Well WW1 was justified because all those countries had been in wars before"

This isn't even left-wing education, this is basic af education

(bowing out)

Who said it didn't happen?

The hypocrisy is the "Native" Americans had no concept of sovereign nations, and had no laws, but you want to proceed in telling the story as if they did. That's revisionist history to fit your agenda, not actual history.

WWI isn't a comparable example because all were sovereign nations with laws regarding property ownership.


Show me the indian matching documentation

 

[Claymantan]

Who said it didn't happen?

The hypocrisy is the "Native" Americans had no concept of sovereign nations, and had no laws, but you want to proceed in telling the story as if they did. That's revisionist history to fit your agenda, not actual history.

WWI isn't a comparable example because all were sovereign nations with laws regarding property ownership.


Show me the indian matching documentation

I don't even understand this argument...

First off, you start with a false premise. Education in America is pretty solid on this topic.

Although they had federations and were capable of organizing to meet the changing political climate brought by the Europeans, history acknowledges that infighting prevented them from forming a formidable front against European invasion.

History acknowledges that most Native Americans were killed by disease - history also acknowledges the effort by Christian missionaries, especially in Spanish colonies.

The only people who don't know these things are people who either didn't pay attention in school or didn't go to it.

Generally, nobody with sense is trying to portray the Native Americans as cherubs. They are showing that the Native Americans did experience violence and persecution, which none of this debunks, or justifes, dear God.

On that note, you should go back to school and learn what White Man's Burden is...

 

[slimreaper]

I don't even understand this argument...

First off, you start with a false premise. Education in America is pretty solid on this topic.

Although they had federations and were capable of organizing to meet the changing political climate brought by the Europeans, history acknowledges that infighting prevented them from forming a formidable front against European invasion.

History acknowledges that most Native Americans were killed by disease - history also acknowledges the effort by Christian missionaries, especially in Spanish colonies.

The only people who don't know these things are people who either didn't pay attention in school or didn't go to it.

Generally, nobody with sense is trying to portray the Native Americans as cherubs. They are showing that the Native Americans did experience violence and persecution, which none of this debunks, or justifes, dear God.

On that note, you should go back to school and learn what White Man's Burden is...

White man's burden wasn't written until the 1890's. Long after the trail of tears.

In my history class we were taught how the evil Europeans intentionally gave the "Native" American's blankets laced with small pox Which is total bullshit.

The common thread in my history class was that the whites came and stole what is now America from the Natives as if they themselves weren't fighting for it constantly.

Why is it wrong when whites did it, but totally justified when they did it?

 

[Claymantan]

White man's burden wasn't written until the 1890's. Long after the trail of tears.

In my history class we were taught how the evil Europeans intentionally gave the "Native" American's blankets laced with small pox Which is total bullshit.

The common thread in my history class was that the whites came and stole what is now America from the Natives as if they themselves weren't fighting for it constantly.

Why is it wrong when whites did it, but totally justified when they did it?

Your history class sucks, you should petition the school, but based on how your posts go, I don't entirely trust that you internalize all the subject matter that you receive.

I'm saying this video is an example of White Man's Burden. That it's all kosh because Europeans civilized the Native Americans and brought the rule of law/Constitution and blah blah blah. That happened, but justifying negative aspects of history because of how things turned out in the end is a fallacy. There was and is no ephemeral force that required that everyone in the world be up to the same standard of civilization and that required the Europeans to show up and give the Native Americans a lethal nudge in the subjectively right direction.

Cultural relativism is some bs, I agree with you; however, a good retort would be that when the Native Americans were fighting, it was sustainable, and when the Europeans showed up, the various cultures became either extinct or extremely marginal. Not something to celebrate or have butthurt feelings that the whites are looked on poorly for contributing to that outcome. I assure you the Native Americans have far more reason to be upset.

Stop crying about it when white culture still exists and thrives.

 

[slimreaper]

Your history class sucks, you should petition the school, but based on how your posts go, I don't entirely trust that you internalize all the subject matter that you receive.

I'm saying this video is an example of White Man's Burden. That it's all kosh because Europeans civilized the Native Americans and brought the rule of law/Constitution and blah blah blah. That happened, but justifying negative aspects of history because of how things turned out in the end is a fallacy. There was and is no ephemeral force that required that everyone in the world be up to the same standard of civilization and that required the Europeans to show up and give the Native Americans a lethal nudge in the subjectively right direction.

Cultural relativism is some bs, I agree with you; however, a good retort would be that when the Native Americans were fighting, it was sustainable, and when the Europeans showed up, the various cultures became either extinct or extremely marginal. Not something to celebrate or have butthurt feelings that the whites are looked on poorly for contributing to that outcome. I assure you the Native Americans have far more reason to be upset.

Stop crying about it when white culture still exists and thrives.

It's darwinism when darwinism was acceptable.


Now that it no longer is we look back as if an atrocity was committed, but the fittest survived and thrived.


It won't stop meme's like this though

You must be registered for see images

 

[Claymantan]

It's darwinism when darwinism was acceptable.


Now that it no longer is we look back as if an atrocity was committed, but the fittest survived and thrived.

So...shouldn't you be upset that the Europeans showed up and ultimately ended the trend of Native Americans living according to Darwinism?

 

[Power Bottom]

Not accurate.

 

[paratise]

You are a pathetic person with a pathetic agenda. That is all i am gonna say because truly you are so unworthy to give more effort.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Everybody fights, we get it. That doesn't clean the hands of the Europeans though.

Does it really bother you that much when people try to make you feel 'guilty'? I swear to God, conservatives are always talking about people being oversensitive but they're the f*cking same.

 

[slimreaper]

So...shouldn't you be upset that the Europeans showed up and ultimately ended the trend of Native Americans living according to Darwinism?

They were living in an unfit form of Darwinism. The fittest arrived and Dominated.

Not accurate.

No, that's your bias showing like mine. Everything in the video is entirely accurate, you just don't like white people

Everybody fights, we get it. That doesn't clean the hands of the Europeans though.

Does it really bother you that much when people try to make you feel 'guilty'? I swear to God, conservatives are always talking about people being oversensitive but they're the f*cking same.

Yes it does. There is no guilt, If it was on me I'd have every race live separately and fend for themselves, so I feel no guilt.

That said, There is no guilt to feel. The romans burnt people alive in metal bulls, but because they're were the same color they were revered. I just love hypocrisy, that's all.

 

[Power Bottom]

They were living in an unfit form of Darwinism. The fittest arrived and Dominated.

No, that's your bias showing like mine. Everything in the video is entirely accurate, you just don't like white people


Yes it does. There is no guilt, If it was on me I'd have every race live separately and fend for themselves, so I feel no guilt.

That said, There is no guilt to feel. The romans burnt people alive in metal bulls, but because they're were the same color they were revered. I just love hypocrisy, that's all.

Labeling a youtuber biased and not well thought out vid as accurate is clearly not.

, you just don't like white people

Your projection is too much

You must be registered for see images

I'm not entertaining this foolish vid/discussion anymore

 

[slimreaper]

Labeling a youtuber biased and not well thought out vid as accurate is clearly not.


Your projection is too much

You must be registered for see images

I'm not entertaining this foolish vid/discussion anymore

why isn't it well thought out? You bring no actual intellect of your own to give examples

 

[Power Bottom]

why isn't it well thought out? You bring no actual intellect of your own to give examples

I gave no examples because I'm not debating such a obvious and sick part of this country history people try to brush under the table. I simply commented.

1.) There is no point in arguing with you and your mindset on race or any other obstacle non white men face in the world. Why waste my time.


2.) All of his points were aimed at trying to make the genocide of the native americans seem less than how huge it was. A lot of his points were wrong such as native Americans tribes were always at war. As in he's generalizing all of them which is clearly ignorant. They are apparently savages yet the founding father's had no issue taking their government set up when forming this country.

You trying to claim this prejudice video as fact is Lol worthy. You and your everyone is bad but the white man threads are tiresome.


If you quote me I'm not replying

 

[slimreaper]

I gave no examples because I'm not debating such a obvious and sick part of this country history people try to brush under the table. I simply commented.

1.) There is no point in arguing with you and your mindset on race or any other obstacle non white men face in the world. Why waste my time.


2.) All of his points were aimed at trying to make the genocide of the native americans seem less than how huge it was. A lot of his points were wrong such as native Americans tribes were always at war. As in he's generalizing all of them which is clearly ignorant. They are apparently savages yet the founding father's had no issue taking their government set up when forming this country.

You trying to claim this prejudice video as fact is Lol worthy. You and your everyone is bad but the white man threads are tiresome.


If you quote me I'm not replying

So provide an example of Tribes that didn't fight to hold the land they occupied. Don't worry, ill wait.

 

[Guardian of the Rain]

No need to generalize either group of people. There were good Native Americans. There were bad Native Americans. There were good settlers. There were bad settlers.

I don't believe any of those myths anyway. And I didn't know that it was a myth that the Native Americans were highly advanced. It should be quite obvious to everyone that they weren't. Whether a lack of natural resources or a lack of advancement-conscious minds was to blame, I don't know.

As for all this talk about "white guilt", I completely side with you. I'm black, but the thought of today's and the future's white people feeling bad for the terrible acts their ancestors did is ridiculous. If I were white, I'd ROFLMAO if anyone expected me to feel guilty for shit that happened in the past that had absolutely nothing to do with me. It makes no sense.

Slavery of African(s) [Americans], for example...there's no one yet living who had anything to do with it. There remain no more slave masters or slaves. Therefore, I really wish Hollywood would kill it with the movies on American slavery. Well, only if the studio's purpose is to create more white guilt. If those movies continue to be made just for education's sake, then so be it.

Other black people would call me a "coon" or "Uncle Tom" for agreeing with you, but I simply wouldn't give a damn. I was fortunate enough to grow up in diverse areas and have had friends of every ethnic group.I'm on the side of truth and reason. I'm actually surprised that I'm even joining this discussion because debating ethnicity-related topics is beneath me. Guess I just wanted to make it clear to you that not all black people are pro-white guilt.

However, even though I'm on your side, I advise you to stop being so ethnicity-conscious. ("Race" is such a divisive word. I refuse to use it to describe certain groups of people.) If you want to live the one life you were given feeling strongly only about your fellow white people, then fine. But if you're actually a decent person like I feel you are, then renew your mind, man.

 

[-immortal-]

Look the racist made a thread again.

Didn't read , didn't watcht. Thanks for +post