- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Messages
- 19,423
- Reaction score
- 823
You must be registered for see images
KingHashirama;didnt read
i am gonna start using it
Go ahead.Be my guest.
You must be registered for see images
KingHashirama;didnt read
i am gonna start using it
You must be registered for see images
KingHashirama;didnt read
i am gonna start using it
Thank you for being one of the view who was able to understand it, and didn't get on the offensive as if I was attacking them.When people talk about durability they refer to the body as an object separate from mental endurance, I guess.
I agree with what you said though.
Sorry, but give me an example of where i confused them.I think you are confusing endurance, endure, and durability. While endurance (noun) is the act, quality, or power of withstanding hardship or stress, to endure (verb) is the ability to carry on through, despite hardships. However, durability (adj.) is being capable of withstanding wear and tear or decay.
Endurance =/= endure =/= durability
Simply endurance is a noun; it does not describe the character. To endure is the character's ability to withstand, while durability is the description of the character's endurance.
I admit i was wrong on endurance being only mental.....Then you aren't talking about the person, you are talking about a specific part about the person. You can't say that character is durable. You can say his body is more durable, now that is also not true, when we don't know if their body can survive a specific disease that other's who don't have a hard body like them can..
Being Durable in a human sense is to keep going and still be standing. Hence why i stated it is used in sports all the time, as a replacement of the word endurance.
Also you seem to be believe feeling pain == the pain being actually there or the damage actually being there..
But here is the thing, how is that durability? If that person gets knocked out without even bleeding, how is he more durable? He wasn't even able to keep on fighting and standing.. he certainly isn't more durable.
Sorry but who told you endurance = only mental? Endurance is the combination of mentality and Stamina.
I admit i was wrong on endurance being only mental.....
But would it be ryt to say that his skin is more durable? the more durable the skin is , the less likely it will be cut off and bleed when subject to the same attack....
Yea that would be more accurate. That the person has more durable skin. Since the skin itself is not a living thing. However, the problem with that has always been, what defines a durable skin? Able to withstand disease or attacks?
Ah i should have made that more clear.Skin is a living thing, did you not take Biology in school?
Here is why.
1. Its made of cells
2. It can grow
3. Develop
4. Responds to the environment
Butthurt OP is butthurt.
This is ridiculous...
Ah i should have made that more clear.
And as i said it was a bad example. And i try to sound smart? clearly not seeing the grammar issues in my posts.. rofl.I see you edited your post cause you knew i was right. You try to sound smart but in reality you simply blurt out trivialities with no substance. The skin is a living thing, its separate of the body, the cells in the skin duplicate and grow and keep producing only skin cells making it an a unique separate part of the human body. The skin itself is also considered and organ, but i will leave it at that considering that is too much for your brain to register.
That earth analogy was fallacious and of poor judgment considering the context of the discussion.
Ah i should have made that more clear.
Cells = living things =/= humans
Cells = make up of humans.
Yes our cells are "living things" quote on quote. But are not the same as Human living things or the living things i am referring to. Though yes that is a good point, and in which i purposed the question what would make a skin more durable.. ability to withstand attacks or disease?
Oh thank you for asking mate.I suppose i meant hardness or toughness.....and i now realize durability seems to be a broader concept..
Im still trying to understand wt u r trying to convey about durability.....
When u say ‘deterioration’ does it inc. both physical and mental? Since a person who has a durable body(tough,hard,healthy,highly immune to disease or virus) can collapse without physical damage , like when his will break down and lose consciousness......but then u implied a more durable person has to be more able to keep on standing and continue wt hes doing
Sorry, but give me an example of where i confused them.
And durability = noun
Durable = Adjective.
Durability requires to be durable
Just as Endurance requires to endure..
The man is correct. There is a fundamental difference, durable is not the root of Endurance. Durable is the proper term for talking about non-people-like-objects.
en·dur·ance
enˈdo͝orəns/Submit
noun
noun: endurance
1.
the fact or power of enduring an unpleasant or difficult process or situation without giving way.
"she was close to the limit of her endurance"
synonyms: toleration, tolerance, sufferance, forbearance, patience, acceptance, resignation, stoicism More
stamina, staying power, fortitude, perseverance, persistence, tenacity, doggedness, grit, indefatigability, resolution, determination;
formalpertinacity
the capacity of something to last or to withstand wear and tear.
Origin
late 15th cent. (in the sense ‘continued existence, ability to last’; formerly also as indurance ): from Old French, from endurer ‘make hard’ (see endure).
du·ra·bil·i·ty
ˌdo͝orəˈbilitē/Submit
noun
noun: durability
1.
the ability to withstand wear, pressure, or damage.
"the reliability and durability of plastics"
synonyms: imperishability, durableness, longevity; More
antonyms: fragility
I agree that I did mess up on durability, so here is the correct definition: durability-permanence by virtue of the power to resist stress or force.
However, as you can see durability is the same as endurance. What I am curious about is why you think that durability can only be used to describe a non-living object where as endurance can only be used to describe a living thing. Words are not bound by the biological aspects of life. Yes, certain words maybe preferred when describing objects (non-living and living), but to set a limitation on the way words should be used is just absurd. Really words should be used based on the context of the subject to present a clearer meaning as to what someone means to say, rather than be used based a category as trivial as non-living and living. (Yes I know it seems I may be contradicted myself on the last few sentences, but I could not think of a way to reword the sentence to prevent confusion. Hopefully you will understand the message I am trying to convey.)
Endurance=Durability
Oh yea, that is true, but they are also out of chakra, but then you have people like Kakashi with strong ass mentality who can bring forth a small ounce of chakra to use one last technique resulting in their deaht.
But i get what you mean now, thank you for explanation, before i got confused. =D
Ah that is the phrase i should have used "non-people like objects". Thank you for the elaboration.