[Debate] Do you guys believe in the big "E"?

End of Days

Banned
Elite
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,323
Reaction score
957
Maybe because it takes such a long time that people have difficulty in believing, do people also think that the continents were always placed in the exact same position that they are in present?

Not everything happens on a time scale average human is familiar and comfortable with.
 

Waindo

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Reaction score
1,095
Your ignorence is alarming, go back to school.


Hahaha.:lmao:

Oh how would I love to be ignorant. Your grammar is alarming. Go back to school.
 
Last edited:

ComplexCity

Banned
Elite
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
242
You're wrong.

There are more evidence for the theory of evolution than there are for all the other theories combined.



Evolution have been demonstrated to be true hundreds of thousands of times, it's not just a theory, it's a scientific theory (a proven fact about reality)



Humans are apes, we never stopped being apes. (we are primates, we are in the group called Greate Apes and we are in there with Gorillas, chimanzees and orangutangs)



Not monkey's, but apes, we share a commen ancestor with all the great apes.



What your certain of dosent matter, what you know exists or don't know exist dosent matter either, it's all about what you believe in when we are talking about belief.

if you belief in atleast 1 of the several thousands of God humans have worshipped true time, then you're a Thiest.

if you don't hold such a belief you're a Atheist.



Actually it's not, "macro evolution" just like "micro evolution" are just evolution, it's actually very simple, if there are very small changes from generation to generation (you claim to believe in this) don't you think it's possible that down the line, lets say 2000 generations later all those small changes from every generation adds up?



it's like claiming that you belive a person can easily walk a step, or 10 (a few feet) but you don't belive that if a person would keep walking at some point he would have walked a mile...



Actually scientists discarded the notion of micro and macro evolution several decades ago, micro and macro is the same thing, it's all evolution.



His reason for it not being BS is that it's a proven fact.

and you start here by saying that no matter what you won't change your mind on this, and then you claim you would be open minded to his point of view, but you won't because as you yourself stated: You are not open minded about this.



Actually thinking that there is a debate about evolution showes your ignorence of it.

there are no debate to be had. We have named the process lives goes true from generation to generation (we call it evolution) we have gathered the facts and a conclusion have been drawn from said facts.

Evolution is a proven fact of reality, you can chose to denie it, or live in ignorence of it, but that won't change reality.



Actually it's exactly what it is, a scientific theory is a fact, or don't you belive in the scientific theory of gravity?



Uther bullshit, abselutely utter BS.

There are more scietiets with the name Steve that believe that evolution is true than all the scientists who dosen't believe in it. (we re talking a wooping 99,something % aproval of the thoery by the scientific community)



Your ignorence is alarming, go back to school.



he is not calling it unhealth because someone hold the a opinion that as different from his, he is calling it unhealty because that persons belief contradicts with reality.

Unless you can disprove that God doesn't exist then it is not contradicting anything
 
Last edited:

Awkward Linguist

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
24,034
Reaction score
1,958
Uther bullshit, abselutely utter BS.

There are more scietiets with the name Steve that believe that evolution is true than all the scientists who dosen't believe in it. (we re talking a wooping 99,something % aproval of the thoery by the scientific community)


You must be registered for see images
 

Funky Tiger

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
4,169
Reaction score
433
the real god, the flying swaghetti monster made all of us from nothing but raw spaghetti.
 

Transcendence

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
11,636
Reaction score
1,451
You don't need to believe in Evolution. Evolution is fact, back by over a century of documented, peer reviewed and proven research. It's your choice to understand and "believe it" but that won't change the fact that it is true.
 

Transcendence

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
11,636
Reaction score
1,451
Evolution is a phenomena that challenges some ppl's religious beliefs. That's their reason for dismissing it.
Other than that; It's a theory that intellectuals arrived at after factual research and careful consideration. The only issue is that it progresses over a vast amount of time so we cannot verify evolution of an organism in action on the spot. But there is no evidence against it, as of yet.



Rapid evolution is indeed possible and proven. It's dependent on the organism and how much the environment is impacting the organisms need to adapt to survive.
 

Funky Tiger

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
4,169
Reaction score
433
You don't need to believe in Evolution. Evolution is fact, back by over a century of documented, peer reviewed and proven research. It's your choice to understand and "believe it" but that won't change the fact that it is true.

yea, matthew's huge-ass nose evolved from a cretascean era dinosaus known as thirstosaurus.

:^)
 

Cornson

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
910
Reaction score
55
Hahaha.:lmao:

Oh how would I love to be ignorant. Your grammar is alarming. Go back to school.

me not being from a english speaking country and me being dyslexic is the reason for my "grammar" being, what shal we say, sub par?

what's your excuse? (regarding you clearly shown ignorence about evolution)

and you are ignorent about the subject, you clearly are, you have proven as much when you claimed that evolution and the biblical God Creation Myth being equally valid.

hence why I told you, that you should go back to school, a place where your taught about the basics of biology.

Unless you can disprove that God doesn't exist then it is not contradicting anything

You doing it backwards, no one would never be able to disproof the existence, or proof the none existence of god, and neither do they have to do so, it is you that claim that a god exists so you have to prove it, it is not I that have to disprove your claim that a god exist.

you are the one here that have to prove that he does infact exist, that's how it works (you claim it, so you prove it) and until you come up with any proff, just the tinestly amount of it, I will simply discard your claim. (any thing that can be claimed without evidence can be discarded without evidence)

I have abselutely no reason to believe in your claim, because you have yet to demonstate that it is true, and untill you do so, I see no reason to believe it's true.

You must be registered for see images

exactly, that's how stupid your claim was.
 
Last edited:

V h o

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
16,796
Reaction score
815
Yeah it's logic behind it is pretty convincing, a shame it gets piggybacked into religious arguments arguing God or some higher being existence. Then there's the misconception that humans came from apes...
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
Yeah it's logic behind it is pretty convincing, a shame it gets piggybacked into religious arguments arguing God or some higher being existence. Then there's the misconception that humans came from apes...

Dude I love when people say that. It just proves how misinformed people are about evolution Lol.
 

Awkward Linguist

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
24,034
Reaction score
1,958
me not being from a english speaking country and me being dyslexic is the reason for my "grammar" being, what shal we say, sub par?

what's your excuse? (regarding you clearly shown ignorence about evolution)

and you are ignorent about the subject, you clearly are, you have proven as much when you claimed that evolution and the biblical God Creation Myth being equally valid.

hence why I told you, that you should go back to school, a place where your taught about the basics of biology.



You doing it backwards, no one would never be able to disproof the existence, or proof the none existence of god, and neither do they have to do so, it is you that claim that a god exists so you have to prove it, it is not I that have to disprove your claim that a god exist.

you are the one here that have to prove that he does infact exist, that's how it works (you claim it, so you prove it) and until you come up with any proff, just the tinestly amount of it, I will simply discard your claim. (any thing that can be claimed without evidence can be discarded without evidence)

I have abselutely no reason to believe in your claim, because you have yet to demonstate that it is true, and untill you do so, I see no reason to believe it's true.



exactly, that's how stupid your claim was.


[sub]Stupid? For you, maybe; I'll stick to the facts that I've been told, you stick to yours.[/sub]​
 

ComplexCity

Banned
Elite
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
242
me not being from a english speaking country and me being dyslexic is the reason for my "grammar" being, what shal we say, sub par?

what's your excuse? (regarding you clearly shown ignorence about evolution)

and you are ignorent about the subject, you clearly are, you have proven as much when you claimed that evolution and the biblical God Creation Myth being equally valid.

hence why I told you, that you should go back to school, a place where your taught about the basics of biology.



You doing it backwards, no one would never be able to disproof the existence, or proof the none existence of god, and neither do they have to do so, it is you that claim that a god exists so you have to prove it, it is not I that have to disprove your claim that a god exist.

you are the one here that have to prove that he does infact exist, that's how it works (you claim it, so you prove it) and until you come up with any proff, just the tinestly amount of it, I will simply discard your claim. (any thing that can be claimed without evidence can be discarded without evidence)

I have abselutely no reason to believe in your claim, because you have yet to demonstate that it is true, and untill you do so, I see no reason to believe it's true.



exactly, that's how stupid your claim was.

It doesn't matter what you believe or think. As I once said, if you cannot disprove then it is not contradictory. I can believe that one day I'll drive, does it means it's not going to happen? No is it illogical, to some maybe same applies here
 

Transcendence

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
11,636
Reaction score
1,451
It doesn't matter what you believe or think. As I once said, if you cannot disprove then it is not contradictory. I can believe that one day I'll drive, does it means it's not going to happen? No is it illogical, to some maybe same applies here

You're still not understanding the point. What you proposed is a complete double-negative. You can disprove something that exists (Example; Something historical is constantly said, but new evidence shines and disproves the original claim). But if something has no proof of existing, you can't disprove the fact that it doesn't exist. There's no proof for it existing in the first place! If there was any kind of proof of a God existing, then your statement would apply. But it doesn't work here.
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
You're still not understanding the point. What you proposed is a complete double-negative. You can disprove something that exists (Example; Something historical is constantly said, but new evidence shines and disproves the original claim). But if something has no proof of existing, you can't disprove the fact that it doesn't exist. There's no proof for it existing in the first place! If there was any kind of proof of a God existing, then your statement would apply. But it doesn't work here.
I can't wait to see his response to this Lol.
 
Top