Smh. On phone and accidentally liked this hater's post.Here is how I see this debate:
Draegod - Better arguments, better presentation, intellectual strategies.
Beans - :|
Smh. On phone and accidentally liked this hater's post.Here is how I see this debate:
Draegod - Better arguments, better presentation, intellectual strategies.
Beans - :|
hi there, mr. i wanna marry shirou-kunWhen will you realize that only you like the shittiest of characters?
First i want to let you guys know how lucky you are to have a boss like this guy. He is literally one of the best ever, along with a few others (that are not longer active for the most part).Hey everyone. I'm posting here to say I should be able to judge this vs. by tomorrow evening. I'm hoping this debate will get 3 or 5 total judges, but I leave that to you guys as I haven't been active in debates since 2013. I haven't read the entire thread, but if Anub is still active, I'd consider him as a judge too.
From skimming the thread it looks like a doozy, but its nothing I haven't judged in the past. Good luck to both of you.
I wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).I looked back through all my old debate groups and can create a small group of suggested judges.
Top picks:
You must be registered for see linksLead the debate tourney that I got me into vs. threads. I agreed with his philosophy and that got me into creating my own.
You must be registered for see linksVery analytical guy, I remember I trusted him a lot and used him as a judge in debate tourneys.
Other great judges:
You must be registered for see linksVery consistent guy, trusted his judging, worked with him alot.
You must be registered for see linksHad him as a judge in a tourney and recall I thought his judgments were thorough and fair.
You must be registered for see linksWorked with him a lot, probably the most passionate of the group. Didn't agree with all of his judgements, but that's the purpose of multiple judges right?
Noteworthy:
You must be registered for see linksNot actually sure if he's done any judging before, but one of the top overall debaters I was involved with in the debate tourneys. I'd consider him as well.
I apologize if any of them have already been talked about on this thread.
Now lets all go watch Mayweather vs. Pacquiao!
Glad to see some familiar facesI wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).
I like everyone you listed.
Uzimaki and Negative are the only ones that are still active (from what i see)
Convo'd with NG, he said he's just not into the debate scene like he used to be.First i want to let you guys know how lucky you are to have a boss like this guy. He is literally one of the best ever, along with a few others (that are not longer active for the most part).
Take your time man, i think you should pick the team (See who you can get), the fight made me sad btw ( i just got back from it)
I wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).
I like everyone you listed.
Uzimaki and Negative are the only ones that are still active (from what i see)
tell him how floydical is judging ? Its kinda like a last judgment for old time sakes lolConvo'd with NG, he said he's just not into the debate scene like he used to be.
Ya man, i have not been active really for about 2 years. These kids got lots of spunk! Regardless i cant say i know who the better part of 1/2 of them are.Glad to see some familiar faces. Saw a few others on this thread I recognize, but for the most part I'm dated by 2 years when it comes to the debates. 0_o
The agreement was 4 is what he wanted originally. But 3 is fine, they don't go by how we debated like in the past.Question to the thread creator. From my count, Dragod managed 4 posts when Beans only had 3. In a situation like that, I don't even count the 4th post as its an obvious advantage. That's what I plan to do here. Side note, 4 posts each is very standard in a nicely sized debate, but you have to drastically limit post lengths. This evens the playing field and forces the users to concentrate their posts more precisely.
My verdict should be up this weekendDraegod and I already agreed on KIFFLOM and paratise on judges but Kiff says that it might be a while before he can post a judgment and paratise/caterpillar hasn't responded to me. Floydical if you can find judges who can post a verdict relatively soon then that would be even better.
A panel of 5 judges would be best but i doubt we will find that many. So 1. Either way, you should judge.How many judges do you guys still need?