- Joined
- Mar 12, 2014
- Messages
- 8,937
- Reaction score
- 462
Here is how I see this debate:
Draegod - Better arguments, better presentation, intellectual strategies.
Beans - :|
Smh. On phone and accidentally liked this hater's post.
Here is how I see this debate:
Draegod - Better arguments, better presentation, intellectual strategies.
Beans - :|
When will you realize that only you like the shittiest of characters?
Hey everyone. I'm posting here to say I should be able to judge this vs. by tomorrow evening. I'm hoping this debate will get 3 or 5 total judges, but I leave that to you guys as I haven't been active in debates since 2013. I haven't read the entire thread, but if Anub is still active, I'd consider him as a judge too.
From skimming the thread it looks like a doozy, but its nothing I haven't judged in the past. Good luck to both of you.
I wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).I looked back through all my old debate groups and can create a small group of suggested judges.
Top picks:
You must be registered for see linksLead the debate tourney that I got me into vs. threads. I agreed with his philosophy and that got me into creating my own.
You must be registered for see linksVery analytical guy, I remember I trusted him a lot and used him as a judge in debate tourneys.
Other great judges:
You must be registered for see linksVery consistent guy, trusted his judging, worked with him alot.
You must be registered for see linksHad him as a judge in a tourney and recall I thought his judgments were thorough and fair.
You must be registered for see linksWorked with him a lot, probably the most passionate of the group. Didn't agree with all of his judgements, but that's the purpose of multiple judges right?
Noteworthy:
You must be registered for see linksNot actually sure if he's done any judging before, but one of the top overall debaters I was involved with in the debate tourneys. I'd consider him as well.
I apologize if any of them have already been talked about on this thread.
Now lets all go watch Mayweather vs. Pacquiao!
I wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).
I like everyone you listed.
Uzimaki and Negative are the only ones that are still active (from what i see)
First i want to let you guys know how lucky you are to have a boss like this guy. He is literally one of the best ever, along with a few others (that are not longer active for the most part).
Take your time man, i think you should pick the team (See who you can get), the fight made me sad btw ( i just got back from it)
I wont be judging as i have a rather strong bias in this debate, and dont want that to cloud my judgement (or cause argument after it).
I like everyone you listed.
Uzimaki and Negative are the only ones that are still active (from what i see)
Convo'd with NG, he said he's just not into the debate scene like he used to be.
Glad to see some familiar faces. Saw a few others on this thread I recognize, but for the most part I'm dated by 2 years when it comes to the debates. 0_o
Question to the thread creator. From my count, Dragod managed 4 posts when Beans only had 3. In a situation like that, I don't even count the 4th post as its an obvious advantage. That's what I plan to do here. Side note, 4 posts each is very standard in a nicely sized debate, but you have to drastically limit post lengths. This evens the playing field and forces the users to concentrate their posts more precisely.
Draegod and I already agreed on KIFFLOM and paratise on judges but Kiff says that it might be a while before he can post a judgment and paratise/caterpillar hasn't responded to me. Floydical if you can find judges who can post a verdict relatively soon then that would be even better.
How many judges do you guys still need?
How many judges do you guys still need?