Search results

So we are forced to slaughter other species?

Considering we are consuming other life forms that are not vegetation, what right do we have to do so? We technically don't need to eat meat to survive, at least not now.

We all just pretend we are kind, like a piece of armour we surround ourself with that lie so we can sleep well. But really if people truly were "good", we would all live under horrible circumstances. You know the quote, all it takes for evil is for good to do nothing? It's totally...

I didn't say islam was a good thing because alot of people were muslims, I said I assume alot of people were muslims and also interested in science at the same time.

hmm...the more you know.

I mean I don't know it for a fact but if everyone keeps saying it's the religion of science I think there is truth to it right? Like didn't alot of math come from the middle east when they were muslims or something?

Who the hell is Victor?

I have also heard Islam had alot to do with science back in the day and I don't think that's a lie. I think saying it's backwards mostly comes from christianity and the theories of evolution or how the catholic church didn't accept the sun was not orbiting around the earth and the earth was not...

I think if you tell people "A is religious", atheists might back away, and "B is not religious" Atheists might join, except the meaning could be the opposite, making us suckers.

I don't take myself seriously...

Well some religous people think they should blindly do whatever their religion tells them to do no matter what so, if someone could manipulate the scriptures that's one thing. I think religion can make people more sure of what to think of the world, I mean that in a positive way.

ehm.... Not sure the statement implies that is the only factor of moral correctness, would you complain against people questioning someone not intervening in a murder?

what? no?

If I let a murder happen, because I don't intervene, nobody is not gonna ask me why though.

I'm gonna read the rest later, but this is the purpose of the thread, come up with a decent argument, why should we dominate this planet and not robots? I get that we want too, but why do we deserve too?

Over the Hills and Far Away.

Im pretty sure alot of leaders wants a religious population.

If we must specifically deserve to live, why shouldn't we specifically deserve to die? A robot could argue we need to die cus it would make the world a better place. It could be cold hearted logic. That means there is a reason to die but not a reason to live? Consequentially, they're just...

Wasn't Kabuto almost in an infinite loop?

So that cancels out at best. This makes no sense, what have we done to deserve their benefits that is the same reason we deserve to live? Also, the basis is that life is valuable, hence morals to preserve life in the first place, so the basis of your question defeats the thread itself. Just...