I already responded to all of these questions. If you fail to see that, it is not my problem. For the last time, I don't agree with the fact that these questions can be answered in a simple "Yes or No" fashion. You are degrading the situation and it's meaning. Stop asking me to answer in a yes or no fashion because I will not. I already answered these questions in their deserving manner.
Also, you never responded to my key question:
Does the mum have to suffer for the rapists sins?
Facepalm.
So you say you dont want to answer yes or no questions and turn around and ask me a yes or no question lol
Oooooook. Lol maybe you should not debate this topic than. I didnt ask anything hard. You answered them but answered indirectly some and ignored the others. Thats why i continued to repeat myself.
But i understand if they are to hard for you. Like i already said you proven my point. By not attempting to answer directly.
Sir can I respond for him?
1. One of the most celebrated events of our history is someone dying for other's sins. When Jesus died on the cross. So seeing as how our society has treated this act then it seems its justifiable.
2. If he was the one who raped his mother then yes...or had anything to do with it.
3. He does, but if he raped her then I don't see him sticking around to claim the baby. Also most fathers try and not have the baby as most abortions happen when its on accident.
4. The baby doesn't have a choice because its intelligence level is not high enough to understand language, much less the question. Who knows it might grow up to be emo and hoping to die...
Thank you so much!! The questions were difficult for him
1. Bringing Jesus is a whole other debate but since you brought him up. Jesus was fully man and fully god. He and he alone is able to die for the sins of mankind. No other man and no man at all can die for the sin of another, a baby cannot die for the sins of another.
The question is more or less asking, should a baby be punished by death for another man raping a woman. That is how i should have worded it to avoid the confusion. Is the act of the rape justifiable after killing the baby? No. It is not. Because the baby did not commit the crime of rape. The baby is as much of a victim as the mother is.
2. I dont think you understood lol. Basically 2 is the same as 1. Askig if i attacked your mom, is killing you (your moms child) justify the rape?
3 i agree the father has a choice. Obviously not in the case of an event of rape since the act of *** was non consensual. But forget this, this is a whole other arguement itself.
4. So choice to live is only granted to those with intelligence? Or understanding? What about the rights to live? Is that based on intelligence or understanding also? If one doesnt have the mental compacity for language and process info is he/she denied the right to live like they are denie the choice to live?
Again thank you for answering man. Were those questions that hard to answer?! Lol