If you truly think this you might be retarded. The reason there are multiple exits/entrances is so you can get out of the building in case of emergency. Better door locking mechanisms? Sure, I'd agree. But outright taking out doors because 'too many entrances' is actually just dumb. Pull the fire alarm and sit at the entrance as everyone pours out. Recipe for disaster.
Republican solution to gun violence.....DOOR CONTROL!
- Thread starter Lightbringer
- Start date
When you're this idiotic and blind i don't think you're in a good position call anyone retarded. Apparently more strict security is a horrible idea and anyone supporting it is retarded. Interesting how it's always the left leaning lunatics who find a problem in every solution or step towards progress so long as it is a republican or conservative proposing it. Things always have to go their way.
How about we remove the doors instead of locking them harder in a way that no one can get in or out, and allow everyone in and out as they please as it is also easier in case of "an emergency". We get rid of the school officer because he could accidentally shoot someone else or lose it and start shooting and beating up students. Not arm the teachers because that's obviously a bad idea as they could also lose it. Remove cameras as they could be used to spy and plan an attack. And we don't check on the students as it is harassment. Now these are genius ideas, right?
Lightbringer
Active member
So what is your ideal solution? One entrance, military grade officers roaming the hallways, armed teachers, and cameras?
Are we talking about a school or a prison?
Yes actually, given how many shootings there have been and how many people have died i belive these extreme measurements are appropriate enough. It's still a solution even if they feel like they're in jail.
I already felt like i was in jail when i was in school so it wouldn't be that much different anyway. Just more safety.
School.
Lightbringer
Active member
No it's not because those "solutions" have already failed.
We've already had both security and armed teachers lose their guns in school and misfire their weapon, causing bystander casualties.
In the last few school shootings, there were armed officers stationed that did absolutely nothing.
And limiting entrances doesn't stop an unsuspecting student from sneaking in a gun. It only gives the victims less ways to escape.
Lightbringer
Active member
Yeah, I do; the same idea other countries with previous gun violence had and mitigated successfully through responsible gun laws.
Last edited:
In others words you don't. Good luck fantasizing about gun laws that will either 1. Never be implemented. 2. Already exist. 3. Will never work. 4. Will cause more harm in the long term than good.
Lightbringer
Active member
I've given you examples before, but just like always you deny reality.
You should change your name to "Cognitive Dissonance."
~WastelandSociety~
Active member
How is it progress to say the most retarded thing that pops into your mind?
Q: How do we stop mass shootings?
A: Get rid of all of the doors. If there's no doors the shooters can't get in. Duh.
You legit don't see how that's stupid and not progress?
I also love that you see that someone disagrees with your idea so they're automatically a 'left leaning' individual. Not possibly just an objective person calling you on your stupid shit?
And when did I say any of that? Notice you're also being extremely hypocritical. 'Why are you trying to stop progress bro.'
How is more security retarded? Especially after the many recent shootings?
Less entrances and more security or more entrances and less security so anyone can get in and out like it's their home. Gee i wonder what's the better idea to try to prevent these types of tragedies.
Nah, i actually see it. It's absolutely stupid and not progress whatsoever to do something that could potentially lower the chances of a massacre.
It's not my fault that 99% of the time it's a left leaning jackass, and it takes a left leaning jackass to call the idea "retarded", so i'm sorry for the assumption.
I was being sarcastic.
Oh you're being serious?
So when the officer is scared at that one entrance to the school and is afraid to confront the shooter, where will everyone run?
What's the procedure for the security guard when the fire alarm is pulled?
What happens when the guard is shot first and the gunman proceeds into the school?
Shall I keep going? You're so strung up on this 'progress' talking point that you're not looking at the obvious. You don't(Legally can't) take away entrances and exits to a highly populated building. When something actually happens and people die because of the lack of exits, everyone will be saying the opposite. 'Hur dur, i think we needz moar dorz'. 'Damm liberulz stoppin' our prawgrez!'
Why? It's a retarded idea.
Re-read.
The point is to not have someone with a gun get in in the first place, and have a competent officer.
That would depend on the situation. Is it a fire? Is it this? Or is it that? It all depends.
The other guards would intervene assuming they further reinforce security with more officers at the school. Someone will call the police from either the school or outside and they'll make their way to the exit or lock the doors etc. Depending on the best approach at the moment.
No, i had enough of your bs.
demon of the leaf
Active member
The problem is that standard security is not followed what so ever security as it currently is in american schools are very lax and that is not acceptable. When i went to get my transcrpts i wasnt even asked to go into a scanner nor was i even escorted to where i was supposed to go im sure that has become more stricter but that is besides the point currently school are super soft targets with windows being everywhere and barely securable entry ways to predesignated evacuation areas. The evacuation areas are kill zones practically.
And what happens when the 'competent' officer isn't so competent like we saw at Parkland? Would less entrances and exits have helped in that situation? How about the recent one in Texas? Imagine if the Las Vegas concert had only one exit that everyone had to run through in case of an emergency. It was already an open venue for the most part and people still got trampled and slaughtered.
Because you can't prove me wrong or defend your 'not retarded progress' it's bs? Alright bud.