Ok and what's your point? How is this relevant to the discussion?
Everything you do and know is due to external influence as well. What a revelation!
My point was pretty spot on, actually.Why deny the truth.
Everything you do and know is due to external influence as well
There's holes in your logic.That's not what's true, but atleast what you wish to
paint of the issue. It's too conclusive and one-sided, but at least you've attempted make yourself sound as if you know what you're talking about.
You say discussing anything with me is like beating a dead horse, but honestly, discussing anything with you is always
one-sided and
faulty. You're not smart, to be honest. There's tons of hidden holes in your logic...kind of really good at what you do.Maybe that's why you rely of the information of another self-entitled genius that convinces you that his/her information is accurate. You really put these people on a pedestal.
Terms like agnostic, atheist, etc...all of em were invented out of retaliation against religion, these people technically still look up to religion, or take it into consideration.In fact, it stems from religion, and the doctrine that everyone should have a faith in a higher power.That was the human "standard", but my point is, as expressed many threads ago, it shouldn't have even been that way. There's nothing to go by, so therefore no one should be categorized for not believing in something that isn't substantial. In a way, your life is still being controlled/influenced by religion, and you're being categorized as something else, for not having/being apart of one. I want no parts of it. You're being painted as an "outcast" or some "non-believer" for not being insane or delusional.
We really shouldn't have entertained the idea.