no...part 1 hinata >>>> part 1 sakura in combat by far...so she wouldn't be useless...they just lose a little less brain powerSo basically take out a trashbag and put another trashbag in it's place?:bdpf:
lmao Why oh why do people have bias between Neji and Hinata just because of their gender? Neji, like Hinata, never got to have his character fully develop past part 1. Like Hinata, he never shows an incentive to change the caste system.The only true Hyuga in the series that actually cared about their clan surviving and actually fixing their problems would have been better but you can't change what happened.
Maybe so, but Hinata's lack of proper character development is due to a lack of screen time in Part 2, much like Neji. Like I said above, the two had very good development in part 1, but were then dropped out of the manga despite both still having plenty of potential for development, with Neji's most notable moment in P2 being his death and Hinata's being her speech to Naruto. Says alot about how he handled both.That does not mean that Hinata is a good character either.
How is she pathetic?She is pathetic in her own way and it would just be magnified if she got more screen time.
"Kishi was not going to show direct romance until the end"Kishi was not going to show direct romance until the end so Naruto would have had to be more oblivious than ever and Hinata would probably start doing things that you don't like to make things interesting because otherwise it would be boring as anything.
Thing is, Sakura and Hinata could BOTH be made good characters.It would have been better if he just made Sakura better or replaced her with a completely different character that he actually put effort into.
Again, let's assume a competent author here.Though since he is so bad at females maybe the third member should have just been a guy.
and don't forget the fact that she lost to her 6 years old sis :lolPrecisely my point. Her skill is lacking.
Long story short, whoever gets the first hit winsand don't forget the fact that she lost to her 6 years old sis :lol
but she is more skilled than Sakura though, Which is not saying much. I mean Sakura really, really sucks donkey balls at Taijutsu. That's why I think that Hinata beats her in close combat. Because Sakura literally stands no chance against someone who is more skilled than her, especially a gentle fist user.
But I think that Sakura might be able to win by punching the ground, since Hinata speed feats are zero, she lacks the speed to evade. But she can prevent Sakura from punching the ground with air fist palm. So I am not sure who would win in a fight.
Both are on par with each other imo
TBH anyone who is more skilled can beat Sakura in close combat, and anyone who is faster can beat Hinata with a mid range jutsu.
Both are not very strong chars, yet they are very overwanked here.
Hanabi shits on both imo U_U
This never happened, fam.and don't forget the fact that she lost to her 6 years old sis :lol
Yes, I agree. She simply lacks the skills . It is also similar to her fight with Pain . She had the Twin Lion gentle fist technique, a Jutsu with destructive damage and larger AOE, that is able to damage or kill just if the lion heads that is covering her palm made contact with the victim. Yet Pain have managed to counter all her attacks pretty easily blast her with ST.
and she also lacks the speed. Her speed feats are ____ , probably on par with Shikamaru's.
No offense, but how is losing to Pain of all people a testament to someone lacking skill?Precisely my point. Her skill is lacking.
Sakura is good at being a medic. Taijutsu was never her forte anyway.and don't forget the fact that she lost to her 6 years old sis :lol
but she is more skilled than Sakura though, Which not saying much. I mean Sakura really, really sucks donkey balls at Taijutsu. That's why I think that Hinata beats her in close combat. Because Sakura literally stands no chance against someone who is more skilled than her, especially a gentle fist user who can disable her CES with a mere tab.
But I think that Sakura might be able to win by punching the ground, since Hinata speed feats are... zero, she lacks the speed to evade. But she can prevent Sakura from punching the ground with air fist palm. So I am not sure who would win in a fight.
Both are on par with each other imo
TBH anyone who is more skilled can beat Sakura in close combat, and anyone who is faster can beat Hinata with a mid range jutsu.
Both are not very strong chars, yet they are very overwanked here.
Hanabi shits on both imo U_U
I was talking about Neji.No offense, but how is losing to Pain of all people a testament to someone lacking skill?
Well its definitely worth a watch.Right I haven't watched it yet...
This always amazes me because while I understand why Sakura would be disliked in part 1 since she literally did not have any abilities I do not understand why they try to replace her with another pathetic character in Hinata. If you really look at what Hinata did in part one the only thing she did was got her butt kicked by Neji. She literally did nothing else except maybe say a few words to try to cheer Naruto up which he really didn't need anyway. She does not do a single useful thing in support of her team either except try to cheat for Naruto and potentially get her team disqualified.Part 1 Hinata's popularity shitting on Sakura's says everything we need to know about this topic tbh
Hinata had courage and abilities that could've been nourished to advantage by Kishi. Recall, Neji was performing A-Rank Hyuga jutsus he taught himself by watching main branch members. Hinata stood up to Neji and literally fought a vastly superior opponent until her heart gave out. While Sakura had an asspull escape from Ino's mind transfer jutsu (that was never brought up again) and the best she could do was a double knockout draw against a person who isn't skilled in taijutsu.This always amazes me because while I understand why Sakura would be disliked in part 1 since she literally did not have any abilities I do not understand why they try to replace her with another pathetic character in Hinata. If you really look at what Hinata did in part one the only thing she did was got her butt kicked by Neji. She literally did nothing else except maybe say a few words to try to cheer Naruto up which he really didn't need anyway. She does not do a single useful thing in support of her team either except try to cheat for Naruto and potentially get her team disqualified.
No Hinata was a failure from a clan that should have given her strength but through her own weakness she was a failure. Show me again the useful things she did in part 1 that shows what a good character she can be.Hinata had courage and abilities that could've been nourished to advantage by Kishi. Recall, Neji was performing A-Rank Hyuga jutsus he taught himself by watching main branch members. Hinata stood up to Neji and literally fought a vastly superior opponent until her heart gave out. While Sakura had an asspull escape from Ino's mind transfer jutsu (that was never brought up again) and the best she could do was a double knockout draw against a person who isn't skilled in taijutsu.
That was not my point. My point was even if she can kill with a mere tap, If she lacks the skills to land this tap then it is useless.No offense, but how is losing to Pain of all people a testament to someone lacking skill?