What are you saying? Do you know what the term fodder means? And are you really downplaying Sasuke for losing and thinking about how he will get stronger and surpass his opponent? That's retarded? Naruto is like that aswell.He lost to Sasuke at the begining of part 2,called himself weak,then went off to train to become stronger.Sasuke is a fodder, and I'm one of his fans so don't take it personally.
Yall just hype him too much because of WHO he is, and not what HE has done.
i'm not saying Naruto is better but at least he can fight without looking retarded at the end.
It's like "I lost ..but I'll get another power-up and beat your ass later!" type of deal.
Your logic is so off.
"Yall just hype him too much because of WHO he is, and not what HE has done."
????? "We" talk about him and mention what he's done.i don't exactly get what you're saying.
Okay,so Sasuke and Itachi can't use anything other than there natural powers.They have so you call them fodder.But anyone else doing that and it's okay.But if someone were to say Naruto is fodder cause he has the Kyuubi you would go against that.Well I say he is a fodder because everytime he had something, they increased him to a completely new level. Like he is an Uchiha, why would he need anything but his Sharingan? I mean look at Itachi before that Totsuka blade hype, and now no one can take him seriously because why would a real Uchiha such as Itachi need those weapons?
Sasuke on the other hand is just a tactical genius, but he still wasn't capable to win a fight on his own, and their fans like to say he is the Solo King because of plot-given hack powers. Mhm whatever.
You're inconsistent and contradictory.You unlogically bash the characters because of your perceived perception of some fans of these characters.
Real smart.
Sasuke could see and dodge all of Haku's attacks.If he was fighting one on one then he would have lost.How does hitting someone who hit you redeem you? Sasuke still got soloed, Madara didn't die, unlike Sasuke which means he was not redeemed, and the saving thing is irrelevant, who cares? Plus Haku still could have beat Sasuke from the beginning if he wasn't holding back, he also still could have beat Sasuke in a 1 on 1 with sharingan.
In a 1 on 1 Haku still would have won though.
That doesn't mean he admitted defeat. He still could have won in a 1 vs 1.
Your saying im off topic when your the one who keeps mentioning Naruto was saved more, it is true but as already mentioned it is off topic so lets just drop it. Plus Haku would have won if Naruto wasn't there at all.
No i said that if your going to restrict Bee for hachibi then why don't we restrict MS for Sasuke, i never said Bee still had hachibi. Gaara could have won, the only reason he didn't was because he was scared of blood, the invasion started and he was insane and liked to play with his opponents. A non crazy Gaara could have won.
Genjutsu still could have been released via normal methods, Bee without hachibi nearly killed Sasuke at the beginning if it wasn't for Taka and nothing can change that fact.
He meant he couldn't move outside of the Genjutsu, plus Bee nearly killed Sasuke at the beginning of the fight without Hachibi, he was saved because of Taka. Its also unfair to restrict Hachibi from Bee just because he helps bee, when Itachi helped unlocked Sasuke's MS aswell. a Base Bee easily defeats Hebi Sasuke, and he has a chance to defeat MS without Hachibi if he plays his cards right. Itachi helped Sasuke unlock MS and Bee was given Hachibi and managed to withstand it. Sasuke didn't do anything to unlock MS himself, it was all played under Itachi's hand. Plus it was a 2 vs 4, Remove 2 people from Sasuke's side and he gets stomped, doesn't matter which two you remove.
Taking away MS is ridiculous,it's not a living being.I just explained.Stop ignoring what i say.A true one on one is no Taka or Hachibi.Sasuke could easily finish him with Solo Glance.It's that simple.
Gaara lost,it's that simple.
Last edited: