I'm not going to say all this crap about "all together we can but alone we're nothing" or "democracy above everything".
Sasuke becoming a ruler of the world could very well bring peace if his personality was ideal. During Hagoromo's era I don't remember anyone arguing. I don't agree with the opinion that power will definetely corrupt you, yes it's a high possibilty but it's not absolute.
Ofc, such a behavior could cause injustices such as the execution of kages but it may bring overall stability. Afterall, injustices happen to all the regimes not at the same amount but you get my point. If all the power is gained by one person then it could potentially minimize the injustice if he's an ideal ruler whereas if many people are corrupted then so the number of injustices becomes bigger.
That being said, I truly believe that an ideal ruler could potentially bring better results over any other regime.
However, the true problem about monarchy is that it's only a temporary solution. The reason I'm saying this is because it's mathematically certain that at some point the next ruler will be corrupted and when that happens all the good that was caused from previous dictators can very well be destroyed and it will open a path for much more injustice and chaos.
So to sum up Sasuke himself, could become an excellent ruler (I'm talking about the case of him not being corrupted because of his power) but simply monarchy cannot provide a long term solution since someone is bound to fail.
The difference between monarchy and peace is that while the former's result can be widely different, I mean both extremely positive (in ideal cases) and both extremely bad, democracy is a more stable regime since the qualities of one person cannot completely determine the course of a country (at least not totally).
I wrote the above because I think that the majority of the base thinks only the surface of Sasuke's revolution, while they support mutual understanding and love but we should think of his scenario in a more realistic basis. No regime is bad by definition. It's quality is defined by its leader(s).
UPDATE
Just to make something clear so I won't be misunderstood.What I judge is not Sasuke's own ability to rule but the wide belief that no one can't rule well alone. What I'm saying is that it could bring temporary solutions only because of its impossibity to always find good leaders and in ideal cases (with always excellent rulers)its only true drawback is that in the long term it's bound to cause more instability that the stability that exists in other regimes..
Sasuke becoming a ruler of the world could very well bring peace if his personality was ideal. During Hagoromo's era I don't remember anyone arguing. I don't agree with the opinion that power will definetely corrupt you, yes it's a high possibilty but it's not absolute.
Ofc, such a behavior could cause injustices such as the execution of kages but it may bring overall stability. Afterall, injustices happen to all the regimes not at the same amount but you get my point. If all the power is gained by one person then it could potentially minimize the injustice if he's an ideal ruler whereas if many people are corrupted then so the number of injustices becomes bigger.
That being said, I truly believe that an ideal ruler could potentially bring better results over any other regime.
However, the true problem about monarchy is that it's only a temporary solution. The reason I'm saying this is because it's mathematically certain that at some point the next ruler will be corrupted and when that happens all the good that was caused from previous dictators can very well be destroyed and it will open a path for much more injustice and chaos.
So to sum up Sasuke himself, could become an excellent ruler (I'm talking about the case of him not being corrupted because of his power) but simply monarchy cannot provide a long term solution since someone is bound to fail.
The difference between monarchy and peace is that while the former's result can be widely different, I mean both extremely positive (in ideal cases) and both extremely bad, democracy is a more stable regime since the qualities of one person cannot completely determine the course of a country (at least not totally).
I wrote the above because I think that the majority of the base thinks only the surface of Sasuke's revolution, while they support mutual understanding and love but we should think of his scenario in a more realistic basis. No regime is bad by definition. It's quality is defined by its leader(s).
UPDATE
Just to make something clear so I won't be misunderstood.What I judge is not Sasuke's own ability to rule but the wide belief that no one can't rule well alone. What I'm saying is that it could bring temporary solutions only because of its impossibity to always find good leaders and in ideal cases (with always excellent rulers)its only true drawback is that in the long term it's bound to cause more instability that the stability that exists in other regimes..
Last edited:
