[Discussion] Do We Exist?

[Kenotthib]

You cannot through questions around to counter arguments or ideas or eventually you guys will end up at:

Why?

Why not?

True but you can throw them around to add to arguments.

 

[CurseSealofEarth]

Since not every question has been answered that's pure speculation.

Has every question not been answered, or do you not know every answer?

You cannot through questions around to counter arguments or ideas or eventually you guys will end up at:

Why?

Why not?

Why do you say that?

 

[Howard]

If someone says a certain democratic government is really a fascist government are they not questioning the democratic government's system or if someone says obama is a good for nothing leader are they not questioning his leadership?

No, they're making statements. A question would be, someone saying something like "This democratic government is simply a fascist one in a sheep's clothing don't you agree?" that would be a question, not a statement. As it stands though "A certain democratic government is a fascist one." Is a statement and will always be as such at least to me. Unless you put a question mark at the end thus making it a question. Also stating that "Obama is a good for nothing leader." is simply that an opinion, a statement. Definitely not a question.

are they not questioning his leadership?

Believe this is the first question you've posed since the OP, tbh.

 

[drknght]

We exist, because we are all different. You don't think what I think, you don't know what I know, you don't know what I'm going to say next. Please tell me you do.......

 

[Howard]

We exist, because we are all different. You don't think what I think, you don't know what I know, you don't know what I'm going to say next. Please tell me you do.......

Forty-Two?

 

[Kenotthib]

You can state something that question something else. Like someone saying every fish in the ocean is brown and someone else saying every fish in the ocean isn't brown all fishes have different variations in colors. That questions the first person's idea.

 

[Howard]

You can state something that question something else. Like someone saying every fish in the ocean is brown and someone else saying every fish in the ocean isn't brown all fishes have different variations in colors. That questions the first person's idea.

nooo, they're both statements. It doesn't matter if they contradict or not, it doesn't make them questions.

Saying

"One plus one is two" and "One plus one is one" are both statements like your above post. One is right and one is wrong, no one is questioning anyone. Both are statements, albeit statements that can be proven true or false but still statements none the less.

In logic a statement is either (a) a meaningful declarative sentence that is either true or false, or (b) that which a true or false declarative sentence asserts. In the latter case, a statement is distinct from a sentence in that a sentence is only one formulation of a statement, whereas there may be many other formulations expressing the same statement.

Examples of sentences that are (or make) statements:

• "Socrates is a man."
• "A triangle has three sides."
• "Madrid is the capital of Spain."

Examples of sentences that are not (or do not make) statements:

• "Who are you?"
• "Run!"
• "Greenness perambulates"
• "I had one grunch but the eggplant over there."
• "The King of France is wise."
• "Broccoli tastes good."
• "Pegasus exists."

You must be registered for see links

Didn't feel like writing all that out in my own words, so I'll just do the ol' Ctrl + C - Ctrl + V method. Worked for homework, it'll work here. Also the fact that we had this conversations, means we exist. Just saying

 

[Kenotthib]

nooo, they're both statements. It doesn't matter if they contradict or not, it doesn't make them questions.

Saying

"One plus one is two" and "One plus one is one" are both statements like your above post. One is right and one is wrong, no one is questioning anyone. Both are statements, albeit statements that can be proven true or false but still statements none the less.



Didn't feel like writing all that out in my own words, so I'll just do the ol' Ctrl + C - Ctrl + V method. Worked for homework, it'll work here. Also the fact that we had this conversations, means we exist. Just saying

Then the results would question the otherand it doesn't mean a thing. We're both to strong-willed for this Lol

 

[nanacha]

of course we exist ,in your opinion who build this civilization? : humans ,who committed the war world I and II? : humans who is the responsibleof nature and environment distruction ? :humans , you want more evidence of the humanity existence ;maybe when Korea will explode the the world with nuclear weapons than, you will realize our existence

 

[Wang]

I spam, therefore I am.

 

[Kenotthib]

Has every question not been answered, or do you not know every answer?


Why do you say that?

No one knows every answer Lol

 

[Lyke]

Mate, youre such a psycho

 

[Kenotthib]

of course we exist ,in your opinion who build this civilization? : humans ,who committed the war world I and II? : humans who is the responsibleof nature and environment distruction ? :humans , you want more evidence of the humanity existence ;maybe when Korea will explode the the world with nuclear weapons than, you will realize our existence

Tell me in detail how that proves we exist?

 

[Kenotthib]

Mate, youre such a psycho

Yes I am unique thank you =D

 

[Howard]

Then the results would question the other. We're both to strong-willed for this Lol

No, they wouldn't. They'd still be statements. Again it doesn't matter if they contradict each other or one is right and one is wrong they're still statements. If you're not asking something or trying to gain information it's not a question. At this point you're arguing to argue. Mind using proof to back your statements? The one where you said "the result would question the other" because they don't.

One plus one is two.: True
One plus one is one.: False

Every fish in the ocean is brown.: False
Every fish in the ocean isn't brown all fishes have different variations in colors: True

No statement above is questioning any other one. Some are proven wrong and some are proven right, simple as that.

You still haven't provided any proof to your thoughts on if the world exists or not and honestly I can do this for a while.

of course we exist ,in your opinion who build this civilization? : humans ,who committed the war world I and II? : humans who is the responsibleof nature and environment distruction ? :humans , you want more evidence of the humanity existence ;maybe when Korea will explode the the world with nuclear weapons than, you will realize our existence

At that point I think he'd seize to exist as he is thus his thoughts would be somewhat (in a bit) confirmed. Then again his body would still exist in other forms.

 

[Strawberry]

its an illusion by itachi da lord

 

[Alice in Noodleland]

-------> Now I am interested to know..HOw old are you OP?

 

[Howard]

its an illusion by itachi da lord

Nah uhh, it's all the doing of Lord Jashin sama san senpai sensei san sama chan-... kun desu!

-------> Now I am interested to know..HOw old are you OP?

Forty-Two?

 

[Kenotthib]

-------> Now I am interested to know..HOw old are you OP?

17 currently.

 

[Lyke]

Yes I am unique thank you =D

that was not a compliment.


I didn't read your text, only the Heading, recognizing you're a failure.
You're breathing, talking, eating, sleeping and you say that you maybe do not exist?

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images