[Discussion] Zoro = Badass

[Vandenre1ch]

1. Manga scan? Manga proof?

Read the manga & the fight. Its all there.

Luffy's jaw > King Kong Gun?

What type of question is that?
How does one try and compare the two??

So why did you ask me is rain>Cracker's haki? Now you're being a blatant hypocrite.

2. No one said anything like that.. I was asking you a question.. which you didn't answer..

Then why did you ask me if Nami's rain>Cracker's haki? Its a blatant implication. The ignorance here...

3. Show me this "direct manga evidence"... Oh wait there isn't any..

Luffy > Cracker

And to get back on topic

Zoro > Cracker




Nice try Vandenre1ch.. although I have no idea what you were trying to accomplish.. lol

Once again, more hypocrisy & ignorance. You keep laughing at others for providing evidence while you give none yourself. Hypocrite. The evidence is blatantly in your face in the manga but you ignore it cause it doesn't fit your argument. Ignorant.

I'm done here. I wont waist anymore time with as blatantly obvious as this aka Cracker>Luffy & Zoro. There is no other option to this. Pretty sure you'll keep being ignorant & laugh though. This posts & my earlier ones are my counter arguments to your Luffy/Zoro>Cracker BS. If you want more replies, just re-read this post & the earlier ones.

 

[WoldOfFingo]

I dont understand how a Zoro badass appreciation thread can invoke so much anger, rage and insecurity within such a short timespan.

 

[LBeezy]

Read the manga & the fight. Its all there.

Luffy defeating Cracker is in the manga for sure.. Luffy eating the biscuits is in the manga for sure.. however nothing you've said so far is in there..

Try again.

So why did you ask me is rain>Cracker's haki? Now you're being a blatant hypocrite.

So I need reason to ask you a question about the topic we're discussing? Yet you've avoided answering it twice now?

Then why did you ask me if Nami's rain>Cracker's haki? Its a blatant implication. The ignorance here...

?

Once again, more hypocrisy & ignorance. You keep laughing at others for providing evidence

Stop.

Stop right there.

What evidence have you provided?

Be honest.

while you give none yourself.

My evidence is in the exact scan another member and I have been discussing about..

You came out of nowhere to piggyback that member's argument and have provided ZERO scans or proof to back up your claims..

Hypocrite.

The evidence is blatantly in your face in the manga but you ignore it cause it doesn't fit your argument. Ignorant.

Show me.

If it's there.. show me.

I'm done here. I wont waist anymore time with as blatantly obvious as this aka Cracker>Luffy & Zoro. There is no other option to this.

Ignorant.

Pretty sure you'll keep being ignorant & laugh though. This posts & my earlier ones are my counter arguments to your Luffy/Zoro>Cracker BS. If you want more replies, just re-read this post & the earlier ones.

I don't want more replies..

You have yet to bring anything from the manga to support your claims..

You have nothing to back up what you're saying.. because literally everything you're saying is nowhere to be found in any manga scan..

Luffy > Cracker

Zoro > Cracker

 

[Punk Hazard]

1. Manga scan? Manga proof?

I didn't think so.

Luffy's jaw > King Kong Gun?

What type of question is that?
How does one try and compare the two??

You're saying that Luffy would be able to eat Cracker's army of biscuit soldiers, but he barely is able to smash through just one with his fists. The only way that's possible is if Luffy bites harder than he punches, which is stupid.

Your own manga scan proves you wrong and you know it..

All he says is that the water keeps turning them into delicious edible biscuits.. that's all.. no water = not delicious.. they're still going to be biscuits at the end of the day though right?

They're edible regardless..

LMAOOOO what the hell is wrong with you? He said the water makes them edible and delicious. No water=not edible, and not delicious.

He never ONCE says that they cannot be eaten unless there's water.. that it's impossible..

He said the water is what's making them edible.

Yes you are

Lmaoooo

Bro

It's not once been stated in the manga..

Please show me where it says that.. because it's not in the scan we've been posting above..

Here you go, kiddo

You must be registered for see images

Yes. Because no character ever hypes themselves up.. ever..

You need supplementary information to show that their hype is nothing more than hot-air though. If a character hypes themselves up, you need evidence that they're wrong. Where's the evidence that Cracker's biscuits could be eaten if they aren't soaked?

 

[Love Cook]

At this point you're just discussing with an illiterate brain damaged toddler who is too stubborn to believe Oda's word over his. Because if he would do so that would mean Zoro has no feat to crumble the cookie and his world will shatter.

 

[Vandenre1ch]

At this point you're just discussing with an illiterate brain damaged toddler who is too stubborn to believe Oda's word over his. Because if he would do so that would mean Zoro has no feat to crumble the cookie and his world will shatter.

I think I got brain damage talking to him my god....its contagious.

 

[Hexuze]

I dont understand how a Zoro badass appreciation thread can invoke so much anger, rage and insecurity within such a short timespan.

There's a difference here. I doubt he actually wanted to make this thread with the intentions you're crediting him for.

If you notice there's certain retards/trolls that make these type of "wank threads" or bait threads after a recent chapter saying stuff like "this character can neg this character" threads. It's just cancerous. I would group the OP in that category.

There's nothing to appreciate in these low effort shit post threads.

 

[ToshiZO]

There's a difference here. I doubt he actually wanted to make this thread with the intentions you're crediting him for.

If you notice there's certain retards/trolls that make these type of "wank threads" or bait threads after a recent chapter saying stuff like "this character can neg this character" threads. It's just cancerous. I would group the OP in that category.

There's nothing to appreciate in these low effort shit post threads.

There was no shitposting here, you're reaching heavily. He didn't bring up any negatives in this thread, didn't compare Zoro directly to any characters, didn't say he solos or some shit like a wank thread.

It's too bad the haters get triggered so easily. You're literally seeing what you want to see.

 

[Punk Hazard]

There was no shitposting here, you're reaching heavily. He didn't bring up any negatives in this thread, didn't compare Zoro directly to any characters, didn't say he solos or some shit like a wank thread.

It's too bad the haters get triggered so easily. You're literally seeing what you want to see.

This was definitely a wank thread

 

[ToshiZO]

This was definitely a wank thread

What's a wank thread? A character appreciation thread? Ok, then sure it was.

It was definitely no shitpost, only positive vibes in OP's post. Obviously it wouldn't sit well with some of you though, no surprise there.

 

[Punk Hazard]

What's a wank thread? A character appreciation thread? Ok, then sure it was.

It was definitely no shitpost, only positive vibes in OP's post. Obviously it wouldn't sit well with some of you though, no surprise there.

Character appreciation? Yeah, no, "Zoro is the most badass! He's the best part of Alabasta! He has the best character development!!!" is wanking.

 

[ToshiZO]

Character appreciation? Yeah, no, "Zoro is the most badass! He's the best part of Alabasta! He has the best character development!!!" is wanking.

Opinions buddy. Not everyone can articulate their points well anyway. Were you expecting a deep analysis on Zoro by the OP?

 

[Punk Hazard]

Opinions buddy. Not everyone can articulate their points well anyway. Were you expecting a deep analysis on Zoro by the OP?

Yeah. Just mindlessly shouting "OH MY GOD HE'S SO BADASS HE'S SO GREAT HE'S SO" is a bunch of wank.

 

[ToshiZO]

More like revisiting some of his great moments? Lmfao no surprise here though, people were angry before they even clicked the thread, we already know this.

 

[Punk Hazard]

More like revisiting some of his great moments? Lmfao no surprise here though, people were angry before they even clicked the thread, we already know this.

Right, because revisiting great moments and wanking are mutually exclusive, and a person could never wank while revisiting great moments.

 

[Hexuze]

There was no shitposting here, you're reaching heavily. He didn't bring up any negatives in this thread, didn't compare Zoro directly to any characters, didn't say he solos or some shit like a wank thread.

It's too bad the haters get triggered so easily. You're literally seeing what you want to see.

Have you seen the post? It is a low effort thread. It's a bunch of statements backed up with fancy gifs. Little thought was put into it, so its hard to call it a good thread or even pass it off as an appreciation thread. It's safe to assume he made the thread with intention of making a "hot topic thread" rather than actually appreciating the character, seeing how he expected the hate.

I've seen better Zoro related threads where actually effort or at least some form of thought was put into it. Nope, I'm not seeing what I want to see. If it was an appreciation thread toward any other character and was done in a similar/same fashion then I would pass it off as a wank thread.

The OP pulled out a statement that Zoro vs Daz Bones/Baroque Works was the best thing in the Alabasta saga (13 volumes worth of content) and backed it up with a gif lmao.

You don't need a deep analysis to come off as an appreciation thread. At least have some reasoning to support your statement, especially if it's as outlandish as the one mentioned about the Alabasta saga. If your best support is some gif of Zoro just clashing with Daz Bones then there's a problem.

 

[ToshiZO]

Have you seen the post? It is a low effort thread. It's a bunch of statements backed up with fancy gifs. Little thought was put into it, so its hard to call it a good thread or even pass it off as an appreciation thread. It's safe to assume he made the thread with intention of making a "hot topic thread" rather than actually appreciating the character, seeing how he expected the hate.

I've seen better Zoro related threads where actually effort or at least some form of thought was put into it. Nope, I'm not seeing what I want to see. If it was an appreciation thread toward any other character and was done in a similar/same fashion then I would pass it off as a wank thread.

The OP pulled out a statement that Zoro vs Daz Bones/Baroque Works was the best thing in the Alabasta saga (13 volumes worth of content) and backed it up with a gif lmao.

You don't need a deep analysis to come off as an appreciation thread. At least have some reasoning to support your statement, especially if it's as outlandish as the one mentioned about the Alabasta saga. If your best support is some gif of Zoro just clashing with Daz Bones then there's a problem.

Still not a shitpost. There was only positivity.

Just not much detail, but like I said not every one can articulate points well.

 

[Hexuze]

Still not a shitpost. There was only positivity.

Just not much detail, but like I said not every one can articulate points well.

I think you're misunderstanding. I literally meant it's a shit post (not by the slang definition), as in that it's very low effort and no thought.

What detail is there? A gif?

 

[-Akuma-]

No way..

Zoro >> Cracker

That would mean Zoro>>Luffy. It's like some of y'all don't think before you reply.

Edit:

NVM, I just read the pages after my initial comment and don't even bother replying back to me. I just witnessed you sprouting utter bullshit for 3+ pages.

 

[WoldOfFingo]

To be honest it seemed more to me the op was just happy and thankfull with the character that is Zoro and wanted to share it with the rest of NB. But sadly enough it was received negative, most likely because it contained the word "Zoro" in it. And we all know, that is enough.