- Joined
- Nov 4, 2010
- Messages
- 14,091
- Reaction score
- 838
I don't think there is a single female in the entire genre who can be compared in terms of development to the main characters despite having screen time.in Bleahc Rukia is better written than Sakura but again not comparable to the mains. Naruto is not the best written series so its even worse here. Those who compare Sakura to the mains are pure trolling, Honestly ever since Naruto launched on Toonami the main thing I liked about Sakura is the humour aspect of it.
Well I agree to an extent but Sakura's character could've done better. Other than that reading or watching Sakura's parts were kind of annoying to me since it was the same damsel in distress shit most of the time.
Yup, it does but Sakura fans have no other way to justify Sakura's writing. No one can honestly sit here and say Sakura's character was equally developed with the other MCs.
Ever here the phrase "Pick on someone your own size". It's like that with Sakura fans. They choose characters who didn't have enough screen time to prove Sakura is a "good" female character or how she is "powerful". Of course they'll compare Sakura to a side character that never had a chance to begin with.
I think comparing to other side character makes it far worse and always points to the fact that she's not a MC material.

