- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
- Messages
- 4,017
- Reaction score
- 164
I've written an entire dissertation on this subject aha so i'll try not to get too into it in case of boring you or spamming the forum but I love talking about this subject. We certainly shouldn't get into the territory of what a 'author' actually is as a societal figure or how much of their works are cultural artifacts (bc its like, 1am here haha)
but i'd say the rather obvious difference is that Kishimoto doesn't know of your fan-fiction or slap his name on the cover above yours.
Anime with split-diversion filler arcs I agree cannot be included because that's an instance where the contradiction cannot be overlooked. Soul Eater, FMA, Blue Exorcist, AKG- yeah, fair enough. Naruto never does this. Interestingly as a good example, Ninja Storm 3 does, it has a straightup different ending to the Ninja War. That is an example of divergent filler, Shippuden? Doesn't apply. I will admit it damages pacing and tension but that shouldn't make it all redundant, it's just a gripe. The only fair one in my eyes.
The problem is though that how can something that is neither confirmed nor written by Kishimoto be part of his story? The only reason why Kishimoto has any sort of influence over the anime is because they need his approval in order to copy his designs and story line. Besides that, there is literally no difference between it and fan-fiction. He can't really do anything if Studio Pierrot decided to take another route with Naruto.