I ignored nothing. I broke down those so called "better feats" in my post as nothing relevant. He was still portrayed as Luffy's bitch during that war, when he kicked him aside like a fodder he isPretty much just said that Alabasta croc is completely nerfed. So your entire argument is thwarted as you're completely ignoring his much better and more accurate feats
I've seen people match Lucci with Crocodile, or say Sanji can oneshot him. How is he ever overhyped?
P.S. Use a f*cking Spoiler will ya?
You think you broke them down? All you did was say "they're not impressive". Not exactly a convincing argument to say the least. Perhaps because you can't refute them.I ignored nothing. I broke down those so called "better feats" in my post as nothing relevant. He was still portrayed as Luffy's bitch during that war, when he kicked him aside like a fodder he is
And yes, if Alabasta Luffy can completely dominate him in a fight, Sanji can one shot him. Hell, maybe even Lucci too
Why would i use spoiler tags when i want people to see the fight properly?
His only arguable "feat" is when he tanked Jozu's brillant punk, but when you think that Jozu more than likely went easy on him, it quickly make that feat look less significant. The so called "better feats"(singular clash while coming from a background against opponents who were ignoring him) are replicable by Daz Bones level fighters, so what does it tell to me? Nothing relevantYou think you broke them down? All you did was say "they're not impressive". Not exactly a convincing argument to say the least. Perhaps because you can't refute them.
Luffy dominated a nerfed croc for plot reasons. If you actually acknowledged Crocs irrefutable feats then you'd see croc was way stronger in MF than in Alabasta.
So that the thread isn't annoying af to scroll down. People check the spoilers anyway, it's what they're there for. To condense threads.
Yeah because Jozu would go easy on a guy who tried to kill "pops", right?His only arguable "feat" is when he tanked Jozu's brillant punk, but when you think that Jozu more than likely went easy on him, it quickly make that feat look less significant. The so called "better feats"(singular clash while coming from a background against opponents who were ignoring him) are replicable by Daz Bones level fighters, so what does it tell to me? Nothing relevant
He didn't kick Croc aside like a fodder though, he kicked Croc with G2 at full force and Croc moved like 5 foot and easily shook it offWhen Luffy(someone who actually already defeated him in a fight when he was much weaker) kick him aside like a fodder at the beginning of the war, what does it tell to me? That he was still Luffy's bitch, so there is no nerf in it at all. If there was, he'd not have been portrayed like Luffy's bitch during that same war
It's a case of rating him how he should be. Those that underrate him think we overrate him and visa versa. Difference is that our arguments make sense and your lot just refer to Alabasta the whole timeWhy do people overrate Crocodile so much?
That was a cheap way to get Ace out of the picture before he solo'd everyones fav neg diff.You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
But what if Akainu is someones fav?That was a cheap way to get Ace out of the picture before he solo'd everyones fav neg diff.
Your arguments make no sense. You completely ignore the arc centered around Croc and say he got a power boost while in jail. You say him cutting Akainu was an impressive feat, even though Akainu was focused on Jinbe and Luffy. Not to mention that a fodder shot Kizaru by surprise, but that isn't considered impressive. You also think that Croc fighting Akainu for a few mins is impressive, even though he had help from Marco, Vista, and the other commanders.It's a case of rating him how he should be. Those that underrate him think we overrate him and visa versa. Difference is that our arguments make sense and your lot just refer to Alabasta the whole time
You mean the arc where he nearly killed Luffy thrice? Are you ignoring his feats from later in the Manga just to prove a point? How does that work. That's like me saying Sentomaru stomps Luffy because it happened before and Luffy can't use Busoshoku haki (yeah lets ignore the timeskip for arguments sake shall we?).Your arguments make no sense. You completely ignore the arc centered around Croc and say he got a power boost while in jail. You say him cutting Akainu was an impressive feat, even though Akainu was focused on Jinbe and Luffy. Not to mention that a fodder shot Kizaru by surprise, but that isn't considered impressive. You also think that Croc fighting Akainu for a few mins is impressive, even though he had help from Marco, Vista, and the other commanders.
Because Luffy was training for 2 years and Croc was stuck in ID for a few months. Your example is terrible. Croc had help from all of the commanders except Jozu, so him surviving Akainu is not impressive at all.You mean the arc where he nearly killed Luffy thrice? Are you ignoring his feats from later in the Manga just to prove a point? How does that work. That's like me saying Sentomaru stomps Luffy because it happened before and Luffy can't use Busoshoku haki (yeah lets ignore the timeskip for arguments sake shall we?).
It's that kind of logic. And it's heavily flawed.
I'm not saying he got a power boost. I'm saying he was always that strong but was nerfed for plot purposes to accelerate Luffy into the eyes of the world. The fight is also rushed. Notice how Croc took no damage from Luffy in all the previous fights and then randomly, miraculously gets beaten around?
I was saying Croc survived fighting Sakazuki and did a better job against Sakazuki than Jinbe and Vista. Being shot is a bit different to being cut in half and engaging in full blown mortal combat, is it not?
He fought Sakazuki at seperate times to the other commanders.
Before calling my arguments irrelevant please say something relevant.Your using the same irrelevant arguments I have seen Croc fanboys use all the time.
Croc blocked a kick from Doflamingo. In fact it was the other way around and a half ass kick at best.
He was held in lvl 6. Well duh he was a freaking Shichibukai who had got stopped from getting the damn pluton.
Etc etc we counter and encounter these arguments all the damn time but there still used as excuses for Croc to be at this lvl he clearly shouldn't be.
Now I agree we dont know how strong he currently is. But placing him over people like Luffy and Law without feats is overrating for sure. Not only does it make Luffys statement about surpassing Croc useless but it also makes no since for Croc to have more growth than the roaming blooming SNs who are making a name for themselves and are getting stronger by each adventure and will be going after yonkos really soon.
Croc fits no where in that, he should be the least of there problems. Can you imagine Luffy beating Kaido and then having a rematch with Croc later on? Croc would get crapped on and Luffy won't need to rely on cheap weakness to win, maybe that would be better for you fanboys. A fair on fair battle between Luffy and Croc both with Haki so you people can finally see that Croc is no threat.
Exactly. My example is terrible because it's the same terrible logic you use.Because Luffy was training for 2 years and Croc was stuck in ID for a few months. Your example is terrible. Croc had help from all of the commanders except Jozu, so him surviving Akainu is not impressive at all.
No it was a terrible example because it doesn't disprove my logic in any way since Luffy had the chance to power up during those 2 years while there was no possible way for Croc to increase in strength during his months in ID. He had help from he commanders, you are just denying manga facts.Before calling my arguments irrelevant please say something relevant.
It was a joint clash
The levels were based on how dangerous they were as individuals, not crimes, that's what bounties are for.
The fact the SNs are getting stronger is irrelevant. The fact Luffy said he will surpass Crocodile in future during the fight implied that Crocodile was still stronger when they fought, regardless of the outcome. Croc negged Luffy twice and was suddenly weakened magically for their third clash.
You think Luffy will beat Kaidou? I've heard it all now.
Exactly. My example is terrible because it's the same terrible logic you use.
No he didn't?
It wasn't meant to disprove your logic. It was meant to exemplify how f*cked up your logic is. You can't ignore feats from a later point in the Manga for the sake of saying he's weak.No it was a terrible example because it doesn't disprove my logic in any way since Luffy had the chance to power up during those 2 years while there was no possible way for Croc to increase in strength during his months in ID. He had help from he commanders, you are just denying manga facts.
According to whom?I wonder why Lucci was considered a greater threat than Crocodile, really wonder why
The entire world government, Kuma, the entire worldAccording to whom?
He wasn't stronger than he was at Alabasta.It wasn't meant to disprove your logic. It was meant to exemplify how f*cked up your logic is. You can't ignore feats from a later point in the Manga for the sake of saying he's weak.
EXACTLY. HE HAD NO OPPORTUNITY TO POWER UP. AND YET HE SOMEHOW WAS STRONGER, AND I MEAN MILES STRONGER, THAN HE WAS IN ALABASTA WHEN HE FOUGHT IN THE MARINEFORD WAR!
THIS SUPPORTS MY POINT. CROCODILE WAS NERFED FOR PLOT REASONS. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY AROUND IT.
According to whom?