Can there actually be equality without compensation though? Equal opportunities and equality are two different things. Fact of the matter is that typically, whites will have better socio-economic backgrounds than blacks, and those with more creditable backgrounds will always be favoured.
What is equality anyway? It just seems so vague when you really think about it.
Equality is nothing more, nothing less than all the groups of society having the same rights guaranteed by law, as they are all seen and respected as citizens. And yes, there can be equality without compensation. In fact, compensation is a mistake. And do you know why? Because compensation means that the previously opressed group would have more rights than the other regular groups. And that will cause hatred. Hatred that can be seen, in fact. Or isn't it true that there is a lot of anti-feminists out there? And they were created because of these compensatory measures.
You can't expect the problem to dissapear overnight. Things aren't like that. It takes time, it takes patience to fix such big problems. If you try to rush it without looking at the consequences of what you're doing, you're just going to create more problems.
Compensatory measures are nothing more than repeating the same mistake made in the past with the opposite group. By trying to give the "opressed groups" the same opportunities in a rushed way, and sometimes, by a twisted concept of equality, extremists try to take away the essencial rights of the regular groups. What happens next? In a few years, the regular groups will tend to hate the previously opressed minorities for this exact reason. So they'll fight against that setting, as the opressed minorities are fighting now. So, you create a freaking cicle, and instead of erasing hatred, you reinforce it.
Does that sound like a solution? I don't think so.