- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,586
- Reaction score
- 433
To me, the quality of antagonists shouldn't be determined by how much power they have or how much they've accomplished. What makes a quality antagonist is their history, their relation to protagonists, and their reason for being an antagonist. For example, I still think Nagato/Pain was the best antagonist this series had. Even though he didn't accomplish much in the end, he was a very interesting character with a powerful background and a solid reason for turning to the "dark side". I don't really like the word "villain" either because that makes you think the person is truly evil. A lot of antagonists in Shonen manga are not really evil, they are misguided or twisted in believing what they are doing is better for the world...or "bored".
Nagato was great. Also, he did accomplish much. He figureheaded an organization that caught 7 bijuus and he destroyed Konoha. He killed Jiraiya. He was great. My criticism goes to Orochimaru who just fails at everything.