Terrorized a family because *gasp* they had a different opinion?Check
Sympathized with the terrorists that killed the cartoonists in France?Check
Affected the livelihoods of many people for not sharing the same opinion?Check
Constantly tries to impede on everyone's right to free speech and freedon of expression by attempting to censor/ban things they don't like?Check
Treat minorities like they're nothing more than tokens to be used in a game?Check
Willing to ignore hundreds of children being raped in the U.K because the perps were Muslims?Check
Radicalizing and poisoning the minds of the next generation?Check
I could go on but I made my point,btw...that scientist did more than any of the dipshits that attacked him ever will.
You're comparing Internet warriors, who have no political power, to the radical right, which has a monopoly over a good portion of the US, and had perpetuated real problems for a long time. You're whole argument is based on a group's misguided opinion and anecdotal actions. The difference is the radical right has implemented policies and systems that have harmed multiple states and people.
"Radicalizing and poisoning the minds of the next generation" Wow, that's very ironic. I can't properly describe of the culture here, but I described it well enough in my earlier post.
Oh please,it's not just SJWs(who don't even identify as being leftists) that condone bigotry as long as it's white people.
The entire extreme left believes in the concept of White Guilt and the idea that minorities can't speak for themselves so they need someone(AKA the extreme left) to do it for them.That all of the world's ills can be blamed on white men and so they deserve everything bad that happens to them.
You've been complaining about SJW (I hate this word btw) this whole thread and now you're saying they don't identify as leftist. So what's the deal with radical leftists, then?
My idea of the radical left is of those that try to lynch people for having different opinions or saying things they don't like(or take out of context and lie about).
They're the people who try to infringe on the free speech of others by targeting their jobs or other places of employment.Or tell people what to think and feel.
And while the radical right white washes slavery,they're not the ones currently on a campaign to pretend the civil war didn't happen by trying to remove the Confederate flag.
Riker explained it best
Also you're complaining about isolated cases.
Oh man. This last part. See, this is another thing that you don't understand. Wanting the confederate flags to come down from state capital grounds does not equal wanting to pretend the civil war never happened. That's a dumb notion. The confederate battle flag (note not the CSA flag) was only popularized way after the civil war during the 50s and 60s, and it was popularized by radical right politicians no less. For example, the South Carolina governor only built that monument as a spit in the face of the civil rights movement. Many southern black people are offended by the confederate flag because it's like a spit in the face to them. Not only does it represent opposition to the civil rights movement, it represents an illegitimate country whose whole economy was based on the forced labor of black people. If you can't empathize a little with the people who were subjugated for so long, it shows where your priorities lie.
I've noticed a huge problem with people, especially conservatives, practicing revisionist history when it comes to the civil war, and this is perpetuated by radical right news outlets who validate their dumbass opinions by spreading misinformation like saying the war was fought over tariffs or states rights. This is only reinforced by the Texas politicians wanting to revise school curriculum.
