A belief is a belief.I believe not having a contrived relationship would be a great start.
Or maybe don't over think pairings when the story is not really about it?Maybe remove love triangles and have dedicated subplots so people don’t have to deal with jarring timeskip and left to use headcanons
No one was exactly being "abused" and attempt to life was more on principles on one side and crazed state of mind on another - it's something very subjective. And yes such people ending together after a time skip which has settled the issue of conflict is not bad writing. Whether Kishimoto was able to write is well is another argument but your personal disagreement with such a relationship has little to do with quality of writing.For example if one was abused or had their life almost taken. Would them ending up together in a timeskip make for good writing?
The war arc was all interactions and followed by peace process and time skip. You can ask how come all the kids are in the same age braccket- but that's that. Maybe something like millennium baby craze.Or people with zero prior interactions from another village having children make sense?
Such thinly veiled attempts... lolThis doesn’t necessarily have to be related to romance but characters in general. Try to not mention names since users seem to cry when anyone is mentioned.
....................................
Sigh[Sub]So we're going to keep the ball rolling because mods are on a roll.[/Sub]
It's not - rather a trope used in many movies and work of fiction.[Sub]That is the dynamic Kishimoto chose for their relationship. You're acting like this is the first dysfunctional relationship to reach a happy conclusion in shonen. Hint: it is not.[/Sub]
This^[Sub]What pairings Kishimoto made, how he presented them, and how much screen time he gave them is all down to him. Just because the development of one pairing happened predominantly off-panel does not necessarily mean their particular relationship is contrived.[/Sub]
Last edited: