You never refuted any points or made solid ones of your own.Weak comedy, and my points were never refuted.
See how meaninglessly easy that is? Ofc you'd believe your own swill.
You never refuted any points or made solid ones of your own.Weak comedy, and my points were never refuted.
Why didn't he respond? Because he had no arguments left and pyschology is still a failed field and all results should be taken with a grain of salt.You never refuted any points or made solid ones of your own.
See how meaninglessly easy that is? Ofc you'd believe your own swill.
Psychology is a failed field? Then I wonder what the basis of your oh-so irrefutable and absolute opinions are. Probably from your own gut-feelings that are superior to hundreds if not thousands of researchers who work with empirical evidence on the subjects for decades, right?Why didn't he respond? Because he had no arguments left and pyschology is still a failed field and all results should be taken with a grain of salt.
So why is there so many who disagree?Psychology is a failed field? Then I wonder what the basis of your oh-so irrefutable and absolute opinions are. Probably from your own gut-feelings that are superior to hundreds if not thousands of researchers who work with empirical evidence on the subjects for decades, right?
Because it's a diverse field. While there are many who disagree, there are many more who agree, vastly so. The argument that a field of science is a failure because many disagree is a very stupid one, because every field of science have people who disagree.So why is there so many who disagree?
If its so black and white if it is definitely not a mental illness? Even though there is possibly just as much evidence if not more considering biology that it is.Because it's a diverse field. While there are many who disagree, there are many more who agree, vastly so. The argument that a field of science is a failure because many disagree is a very stupid one, because every field of science have people who disagree.
Because a mental illness is a condition that causes a certain amount of distress inherently. Meaning:If its so black and white if it is definitely not a mental illness? Even though there is possibly just as much evidence if not more considering biology that it is.
I'm not going to repeat myself, but its impossible to fully change genders anyway so no matter what they will always have gender dysphoria if they dont drop the notion of them being a different gender, which many do.Because a mental illness is a condition that causes a certain amount of distress inherently. Meaning:
1. The has to cause disruption of the most necessary of day-to-day activities(e.g., someone with schizophrenia being unable to leave bed for days and get to work, feed themselves, maintain relationships, keep up hygiene, etc. because of their delusions)
2. The distress has to be caused by the condition itself. Back to schizophrenia, the distress is caused by the delusions. Outside factors, like societal attitudes towards a condition, do not meet this criteria. For example, a homosexual person killing themselves due to constant homophobia from relatives and peers causing depression doesn't make homosexuality a mental illness because the depression stems from outside reactions to the condition, not from the condition itself. Also note that "condition" here means state of being, not in the sense of a medical condition like a sickness or illness.
Being transgender meets neither of these criteria. Gender dysphoria is a mental illness, but isn't synonymous with being transgender because gender dysphoria refers to a transgender person being prevented by outside sources from representing themselves as the gender they identify as. All people with gender dysphoria are transgender, but not all people that are transgender have gender dysphoria at any given time.
I like when you're challenged, you move the goal posts so much.I'm not going to repeat myself, but its impossible to fully change genders anyway so no matter what they will always have gender dysphoria if they dont drop the notion of them being a different gender, which many do.
You must be registered for see images
I've already laid out all my arguments, i dont need to rehash myself unless im talking to a brick wall which seems to be the case.I like when you're challenged, you move the goal posts so much.
"Psychology is a failed science."
-Response proving you wrong
"Yeah, well transgender is a mental illness."
-Response proving you wrong
"You can't completely change gender anyways."
You might actually form good arguments if you learn not to form them by weaving together tangents as though that's a coherent thought.
Pretty sure you were, and your obvious attempt to deny it is even sadder.I'm not even trying but thanks for the useless tip.
You don't need to rehash the arguments you've made before, but YOU'RE the one that brought up those arguments again. This conversation started from you saying psychology was a failed science, a BRAND NEW argument, and then YOU brought up those old arguments again when I responded. What a slow man you are.I've already laid out all my arguments, i dont need to rehash myself unless im talking to a brick wall which seems to be the case.
This doesn't make it a failed science though. Psychology has still made leaps in understanding its field and being useful for it. Look up "failure in science" and practically every result is why failure in every science field is still needed.[1]You must be registered for see links
Except there's no research showing that being transgender is THE cause of these trends, as opposed to outside sources. Except there are transgenders who live without these trends being a part of their lives, hurting the argument that being transgender is the cause. Except that being transgender alone isn't enough to cause the distress levels needed to be classified as a mental illness[2] Never proved me wrong, Transgender people experience more depression, suicide, other mental illnesses are frequent and they are overall defective persons.
Except I never said you could. I doubt there's a single person today who would say a person can currently transition from male to female totally, hence why they're called transgenders, transsexuals, or Male-To-Female/Female-To-Male trans, whatever.[3] You cant
You must be registered for see links
From the DSM-V, the source you yourself referred to earlier: "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning.”Now even if you dont see high increase of other mental illnesses as dysfunctional the actual definition of "mental illness" varies from what you said to "Mental disorders comprise a broad range of problems, with different symptoms. However, they are generally characterized by some combination of abnormal thoughts, emotions, behaviour and relationships with others. " -WHO
Wrong. Being transgender doesn't inherently caused the bolded, as noted numerous times.or "n. Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual's normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma. Also called emotional illness, mental disease, mental disorder."
Which if you use that definition, being transgender is undoubtedly a mental illness because they believe they are a different gender when they really aren't.
In this link the author Brian Nosek even claims that his reproductions could be flawed and that he really doesn't know.I've already laid out all my arguments, i dont need to rehash myself unless im talking to a brick wall which seems to be the case.
[1]You must be registered for see links
Nope,wrong again.prETTy sUrE yOu wERe, aND YOur obVIOuS aTtEMpt tO DenY iT IS eVEn sAdDER.
You're not funny....just deal with it.Nope,wrong again.![]()
I wasn't trying to be funny tho.YoU'Re nOt FuNNy....jUsT DeAL wITh iT.
You can't join the military with any background related to drugs, theft, or violence. They are actually pretty picky about who they allow inAre they less suited than gang members? Because we currently let gang members enlist without a second look. I'd rather have someone fighting that is dedicated to the cause and you feel uncomfortable about then someone you're comfortable with who is more dedicated to their gang and themselves than the cause.
Id backstab a trans if it wanted to cover me tbhTo be honest I wouldn't want some transgender covering me during combat.
Also not everyone are going to accept them in the military.
That's why you can't serve.Id backstab a trans if it wanted to cover me tbh