Sigh. Last post on this for real this time. If this doesn't get through then I've no idea. I cannotAll your unnecessary posts are meant to decieve, you are deliberately misleading town. Town would look at your posts and believe you are seriously invested in scum hunting because of your lengthy explanation, and most people are put of by such lengthy explanation and don't really read them which is something I believe you want, why? Because if you do read them you will notice a lot of over explanation of useless information.
Red - Begging the Question fallacy. The conclusion, that my posts are designed to mislead town, is presented as one of the premises given for said conclusion. Clearly, the idea that the conclusion supports the conclusion is illogical.
Blue - Appeal to Logos. The conclusion made is that the Town at large will automatically make a conclusion, and this conclusion is not supported. Indeed, don't take my word for it. Simply reading the thread will establish that this by no means is how the Town has acted in this game. Forget not being supported, it is abjectly untrue. This is also a critique of my playstyle, which is useless for discerning my alignment.
Green - Loaded question fallacy. It makes an assumption on what I wanted, and then asks the question presuming that assumption to be true. The fact of the matter is, no I do not want that. If people don't want to read, in a text-based forum game centered around discussion and debate, then I can't help them. I would suggest that Mafia probably isn't the game for them.
Purple - Argumentum ad nauseam fallacy. It takes points that have already been addressed/conceded, and repackages them, to make them appear to be new information, and thus give the appearence of a stronger argument than what is actually presented. The quote below is where this was addressed/conceded.
Note - There have still been exactly 0 examples provided by Ryu to date, to support any of his claims.
Emphasis mine.And don't get me wrong, I do believe there are a few in there that are unnecessary. I am overly wordy at the worst of times, and I can think of one, my post referring to Ansatsuken's grammar usage, which is entirely outside of the scope of the game. In hindsight, I probably should have spoilered it, and made a note to say it could be skipped over.
Any more fallacies you have that I need to point out, or are we done here Ryu?