@ The bolded part:Now this is more like it people THIS IS THE HEART OF THIS THREAD ...THIS DEBATE THESE TWO ARE HAVING IS THE POINT OF MY THREAD.
Thank you for your post 6thpathsage and XxItachi x!!!!
This is exactly what I am talking about. What they are debating over is whether or not it is OK to justify something with science even if there is no proof to support it
Although just to 6thpathsage I am not interested in proving equality as I know all humans are equal regardless of race,sexual preference ,etc...
I am applauding you two for reaching the point of the matter... sage you point it out well, only you can validate yourself .for the most part( as human as a species are approval junkies (revolver anyone??)))
OH, if that were the case then hell no. Scientific theories tend to have proof already backed up supporting them, there can be speculation with no proof at all but using that to defend yourself is like using an umbrella against a tsunami .___.