- Joined
- Oct 9, 2016
- Messages
- 5,795
- Reaction score
- 553
There is nothing to read and why is Sarada better character then Sakura? Thats never gonna be the case
LMAO!?!? What?!? thanks for the sig!!!
There is nothing to read and why is Sarada better character then Sakura? Thats never gonna be the case
*in anime.
I agree with OP. Sakura just didn't have anything to make her an interesting side character, let alone being pushed as a main character. It's like if they tried to make Ayame the main heroine.
There is nothing to read and why is Sarada better character then Sakura? Thats never gonna be the case
LMAO!?!? What?!? thanks for the sig!!!
@ people saying Sakura wasn’t “uninteresting” nah, she had potential and honestly it was refreshing to see a female with no heritage or clan get to where they are now, all she lacked was a solid backstory, major fights and some self-respect when it comes to Sasuke.
Sarada is the better character because she actually has a solid backstory, a main interest outside of a boy and far more power potential but that’s a contribution that Sakura made to Sarada. If you like Sakura so much you shouldn’t have a problem with her daughter bypassing her in every aspect that matters.
@ people saying Sakura was “uninteresting” nah, she had potential and honestly it was refreshing to see a female with no heritage or clan get to where they are now, all she lacked was a solid backstory, major fights and some self-respect when it comes to Sasuke. I wouldn’t change her personality or her clan because her character was based entirely on hardwork.
Part 1 Sakura was definitely uninteresting. The way she was introduced, her contribution to the story and plot was major garbage. I only started to like her character in part 2 when there was no Sasuke to fanboy about. And she actually displayed some feats against an Akatsuki.
She was definitely improving strength and skill wise. But her character was immediately reduced to the same old part 1 Sakura after her fight against Sasori.
Part 1 Sakura was definitely uninteresting. The way she was introduced, her contribution to the story and plot was major garbage. I only started to like her character in part 2 when there was no Sasuke to fanboy about. And she actually displayed some feats against an Akatsuki.
She was definitely improving strength and skill wise. But her character was immediately reduced to the same old part 1 Sakura after her fight against Sasori.
stopped reading.
At least Sakura ended up giving her life saving both Naruto and Sasuke back in the forest. Sure i have nothing against Sarada either its just this OP is doing this on purpose and have no right to compare the two.
Even if Sakura wasnt that strong and lacks the real develompent Sakura was always carrying. And whats wrong even if she like Sasuke? At least she never chased him around and followed him just like Sarada is doing with bananaclone
“I want to be like sasuke”
B i t c h no one can come close to him
“I want to be like sasuke”
B i t c h no one can come close to him
I don’t defend Part 1 Sakura that was garbage. Sakura’s development during early part 2 was arguably the best Kishimoto has done with a female. Personally, though, during the war arc, The Last, and Boruto her character was redeemed for me and that’s where she shined the most.
She became a really good mother, puts others before herself, has an important occupation and is so much stronger in battle.
LET’s face it sarada is way more interesting than boruto