Not gonna bother reading your above posts. Prove my initial post with it's formula's wrong and then come talk. It says everything that can be said about countering the techniques.
Going to take this as a shot and write in descriptive detail about your actions recently.
Not sure how I'm acting a certain way over Howard's loss. Wouldn't matter if he lost or won, Naruta and I would have still made that post that clarifies how to defend against kiyoshi abilities etc. If he had won I'd just use other examples from your battle to go more in depth with the explanation since your battle with him was the only one I saw that had a kiyoshi in it since like 2011. It strikes the perfect opportunity to clarify usages of the abilities because of the battle's relevance. One of the things being missuses that defy the laws of physics, and thus using something past it's limitations. I'm only clarifying what it should and shouldn't be able to do. You just so happened to be an example because the topic was sparked around the time of your battle. Nothing more, nothing less. However, when you tried to argue against that when I even had solid proof, showed just how much you really wanted the win (If you can call it a win as no one won or lost, Howard suicided, no one actually killed the other unless you break the fourth wall and declare death by arguing) if your arguing in vm's over a for "fun" battle, should have showed that sooner. Thus I won't be replying further on this. Was a mistake using your fight as an example as all you've done is just repeatedly state things that don't make any sense as if you're grasping onto that technique usage as if it gives you something unstoppable and you're trying to defend it towards anyone that denies that it's unstoppable. However, I defended it, and like anyone grasping onto a technique for it's opness you defended it. If you'd never of replied to me, I'd have never replied to you stating everything of which I did. It can go two ways solf, one can either really want the win and defend it or one can really not take a loss and defend it. By you defending it in your responses to me, it showed that you do in fact care for the win mostly I believe because it backs up the opinion of others (not you as I know you'll defend that if I say you) think that it's op, and if others think you're op then it makes you sit on pedestal. However, my initial post wasn't based on anything to do with who won or lost, in fact, neither of you would win or lose if my info is true or false. The reason you still defended is because I was giving information on how to counter it which you didn't like and so you replied, because if it can be defended then that's bad I assume. Like I said tho, my info wouldn't matter regarding you, I used your fight as an example, didn't change anything because neither of you actually killed the other in your battle, was Howard giving his own character a heart attack due to all the arguing. Howard suicided, there wasn't a win or lose. If it makes you feel better you can call it a victory on your part and you can choose to defend it more with your passive arguing of just saying "Just take a loss and leave it at that" as if we're children and you're the adult. However, what I've said is completely opinion and thus I won't be replying to you further here as I'm done here. In fact, in about 3-4 days, I won't even be active, probably for about 7-8 more months, or until I'm "really" needed for anything related to Ame. Other than that, won't be active much, can feel free to argue on skype, tho I'll just ignore that all as this is cutting into my world of warcraft time and I don't want to spend any more time on this. I have nothing against you personally, outside the base you seem like a chill guy and I don't want this to come between us. Tho, nor will I be talked to as a child either. Either way, my last post to you.
