I saw yet another thread a few days ago claiming 9/11 was an inside job and it amazes me how many people continue to blindly believe it to be true. It astounds me every time someone posts up the same trivial 'evidence' that has already been put forward a million times. Most of the people that believe in 9/11 conspiracies are clinging to things that they feel they can make a difference with. Considering they use one argument more than any other, I'd like to cleanly state my opinion on it.
Truth is, nothing about bombs going off in the tower makes sense. There are no explosions seen that day, only the planes' impact and the cloud of debris caused by the fall. The point of failure in both towers were the exact locations the planes hit. This means the only possible way explosions could have aided in the collapse would have been if they were planted right where the planes impacted and were set off at the exact same moment as the planes were hitting. Such coordination would be unfathomable and any charges in that area would likely have been damaged and made incapable of going off later.
Why is this important? Simple really. It would mean that the pilots would have had to hit these exact points with very high accuracy to line up the plane's impact with where the bombs are at. Considering they were dealing with the New York skyline, it is virtually impossible to hit a high rise building with that kind of accuracy, let alone twice. Bombs going off at any other point in the building would not have contributed to the building failing like that. It all adds up to the planes' impact and the fire causing all the damage. Considering the massive weight of the above floors, the steel only needed to be weakened, not melted.
People's testimony of secondary explosions is extremely unreliable. Its comparable to UFO sightings, 90% of which are explainable. Considering the abnormality of the event, it would be unfathomable to not expect some people to misinterpret events on that day. Again, even if charges were set, they would have had to be set and set off at the exact point of the planes' impact and couldn't have been damaged by the impact itself. Random explosions at other locations would not have contributed. I would also question any supposed 'expert' advice on a matter that has never once happened before nor is accurately repeatable on any small scale.
The people that believe it was an inside job don't think things through with enough effort to see the truth and simply adopt the positions of other conspirators as their own. I beg of you, don't believe in such a heinous accusation just for the sake of being against our government. If you don't like the USA, why don't you try living in a communist country for a while? Better yet, go live in a 3rd world country and see if you miss the USA at all. Don't chastise our government or act as if calling for a revolution against our government would be a positive thing, as you're not going to do much better than the way the USA is now.
Truth is, nothing about bombs going off in the tower makes sense. There are no explosions seen that day, only the planes' impact and the cloud of debris caused by the fall. The point of failure in both towers were the exact locations the planes hit. This means the only possible way explosions could have aided in the collapse would have been if they were planted right where the planes impacted and were set off at the exact same moment as the planes were hitting. Such coordination would be unfathomable and any charges in that area would likely have been damaged and made incapable of going off later.
Why is this important? Simple really. It would mean that the pilots would have had to hit these exact points with very high accuracy to line up the plane's impact with where the bombs are at. Considering they were dealing with the New York skyline, it is virtually impossible to hit a high rise building with that kind of accuracy, let alone twice. Bombs going off at any other point in the building would not have contributed to the building failing like that. It all adds up to the planes' impact and the fire causing all the damage. Considering the massive weight of the above floors, the steel only needed to be weakened, not melted.
People's testimony of secondary explosions is extremely unreliable. Its comparable to UFO sightings, 90% of which are explainable. Considering the abnormality of the event, it would be unfathomable to not expect some people to misinterpret events on that day. Again, even if charges were set, they would have had to be set and set off at the exact point of the planes' impact and couldn't have been damaged by the impact itself. Random explosions at other locations would not have contributed. I would also question any supposed 'expert' advice on a matter that has never once happened before nor is accurately repeatable on any small scale.
The people that believe it was an inside job don't think things through with enough effort to see the truth and simply adopt the positions of other conspirators as their own. I beg of you, don't believe in such a heinous accusation just for the sake of being against our government. If you don't like the USA, why don't you try living in a communist country for a while? Better yet, go live in a 3rd world country and see if you miss the USA at all. Don't chastise our government or act as if calling for a revolution against our government would be a positive thing, as you're not going to do much better than the way the USA is now.
