Lufy couldn't beat Doffy on his own yet he still ended up defeating him at the end of his arc. And what's it really matter if his victory comes with help isn't that what you've been saying you wanted, the mc to not be able to do these grand feats on his own? Y'all act like Luffy didn't have massive help in beating Moriah and other characters. Crackers defense>Luffy but he still ended up losing BM being > Luffy isn't any guarantee she'll win when there's out lying factors.
I encourage you to actually read my posts before you come blathering to me.
Luffy can't beat Cracker, he definitely ain't beating Big Mom on his own.
The situations on Dressrosa and Thriller Bark aren't comparable to WCI either.
No fanboying here my friend luffy is stronger then cracker cracker never took a single hit from luffy but getting knocked through his own soldiers knocked him out. Luffy was able to break his soldier in half which means luffy's attack power is great then his defense.
Yet again you're off because Nami never attacked cracker let alone dealed him damage. Nami didn't even have anything to do with cracker finally deciding to attack luffy head on and subsequently losing the match. This fight is simple it was a battle of stamina with or without Nami if and when cracker attacked luffy one shot would have ended the fight you can't argue that because one attack from luffy ended the fight.
Luffy was only able to beat Cracker because Nami wet Cracker's biscuits, allowing Luffy to eat them and use them for energy. If Nami hadn't doused the biscuits, Luffy would have ran out of fuel against Cracker long ago, and would have been killed during those 11 hours.
You can't even say that Cracker is lacks durable too much so he gets knocked out in one hit, since Luffy had to send Cracker through his own biscuits to knock him out. That's indication that it's not even Luffy's attack that knocked out Cracker, but it was the hardness of his OWN power that sealed the deal, which again shows the lack of power from Luffy's end against Cracker. These are all facts.
luffy could've defeated cracker the moment he broke his first biscuit soldier. When cracker recklessly pushed forward passed his advancing soldiers and tried to attack luffy if luffy connected at that point the fight was over.
Then why didn't he again? Ah, that's right, because Cracker's speed and power was too overwhelming for Luffy to do so.
Because all it took was one hit to end the fight. But how would you feel about the sweet commanders at that point they would be deemed weak, and the reader would lose all interest in the big mom pirates. The reason that fight took so long was to build the readers interest,
Oda making Cracker stronger than Luffy to build interest and tension doesn't change that Cracker was stronger than Luffy lmao
and the fact that it was a battle of stamina who would out last who even luffy said that
And Luffy's stamina only kept up with Cracker because he ate Cracker's biscuits and used it for fuel.
Think it through law and luffy two strong fighters in their own rights defeated doflamingo and did that fight take 11 hours no because that was a battle of strength not stamina.
Terrible example, since both of them are still weaker than Doflamingo.