Doesn't answer much.
Shinobi war has more fodders than in the MF arc, it's more disappointing in Naruto's case since it's a world war arc. All you do is try to contradict my point by posing another question as well & you fail at it everytime. I.E. Saying MF arc was fodder filled as well. MF arc had plenty of characters that were a lot more useful than what the characters in Naruto were doing. Nope, go make a poll and ask people if this world war arc is the best Naruto arc thus far, people will say no. Well at least the ones that aren't narutards.
Shinobi war has more fodders than in the MF arc, it's more disappointing in Naruto's case since it's a world war arc.
The five kages, Kakashi, Guy, K11, Darui, Killer Bee, Kitsuchi, the strongest of the cloud, the strongest of the leaf, the strongest of the mist, the strongest of the stone, edo akatsuki, edo Asuma, edo Chiyo, edo Dan, edo 7 swordsman, edo Kinkaku and Ginkaku, edo Kage, edo jinchiriki. etc etc...
All you do is try to contradict my point by posing another question as well & you fail at it everytime. I.E. Saying MF arc was fodder filled as well. MF arc had plenty of characters that were a lot more useful than what the characters in Naruto were doing. Nope, go make a poll and ask people if this world war arc is the best Naruto arc thus far, people will say no. Well at least the ones that aren't narutards.
I question your point to point out the flaw in your logic.
I don't think this is the best arc either. I don't care about anything the people HERE say. Their opinions are void and contrary.
You say Naruto doesn't feel like a war, yet MF did? When I first watch the arc I didn't even know it was a war. How is Naruto not the one more drawn towards the war theme? Naruto had a secret HQ. MF didn't. Naruto's war was fought on multiple fronts. MF wasn't. Naruto had an alliance of shinobi. MF didn't. Naruto's war was plotted out strategically. None of that in MF.
The war arc was literally model after the themes of a real war. Mf was just two sides fighting at each other, yet MF "felt more like a war". You didn't even come up with that "doesn't feel like a war argument". Most likely, you just heard someone else say that weak complaint and hopped on the hate bandwagon without even rationalizing for yourself.
Doflamingo posed as the threat to Ucy & Law when he was there... Abdullah & Jeet got rid of the clone so there was no threat well at least in the well. Go, by all means. See if it's a writing inconsistency.
Can you tell me, where exactly in the manga is this EXPLICITLY stated that Luffy didn't attack Doflamingo effectively because "Doflamingo posed as the threat to Ucy & Law when he was there". If you have to make up excuses, then I think we know who the real "tard" here is...
That was in other threads and that was months ago? Stop bringing irrelevant past discussions here. Obviously my intent then was to troll you and surprisingly it worked since you're still butt-hurt over it.
It certainly wasn't months ago.. and you still said it. It holds weight in proving that you don't know what you're talking about, regardless of whether it was a troll. Even if it was a troll, we got into an argument over that statement so, apparently you got caught in your own trolling. It was a bad attempt at trolling, as usual.
Don't be full of yourself, if it was so top notch you wouldn't be editing so much.
It's top notch
because I edit it, therefore making it somewhat presentable when it's actually read.
I questioned you being able to read or not, then I called you illiterate (calling you unable to read).
"Are you illiterate?
I've meant it as a personal issue, hence the quotations but if you can read (which I'm starting to doubt if you can) I've stated the potential reasoning why Oda does it & why it makes sense.
"
First you called me illiterate,
Then you questioned my reading capabilities.
You obviously don't know the definition of illiterate.
Illiterate means not being able to read OR
WRITE therefore you did question my writing capabilities as well.
I love how you ignored all those stuff about FI because they were correct. Why don't you make a separate thread on that as well? Those aren't half-assed answers. You're literally nit-picking at this point and trying to come up with a flaw with OP because you think people "wank" to this series so much. FI/Dressrosa/PH will become much more plot relevant for future arcs as Oda placed plot devices. If someone was to skip one of those arcs they will be confused in upcoming arcs cause it is plot-related.
Actually I skimmed through the Majority of the Fishmen Island arc and Punk Hazard arc and I understand everything completely. The arcs are very loosely connected. "will become much more plot relevant for future arc". This again? Until it becomes relevant... It's irrelevant so...
You just were... And Naruto has dropped in quality. "It's not Naruto it's the fans", typical excuse from a naruto fanboy. Look, if you're so eager to prove me wrong then make a thread and ask people if Naruto's final arc is the best arc from the series. People will obviously disagree. It's not the best arc nor does it have potential to be so atm. So much randomness & inconsistencies/flaws. Even the title, "Fourth shinobi world war" is HIGHLY misleading".
What proof do you have that backs Naruto dropped in quality aside from socially impartial opinions of the plebs on this site?
I can tell you that the "quality drop" isn't reflected in sales.
I can tell you that Naruto has a positive opinion aside from the internet savvy fans.
Can you tell me that The "drop in quality" is reflected in the fanbase outside of, Narutobase, Narutoforums, ***********, or other sites that are abundant with spiteful Naruto fans?
Japan certainly believes Naruto is great and has always been great. Weren't you the one that once said "Japan's opinion is the one that really matters. Japan is the motherland of manga."?
The people here are contrary towards anything and they hate near everything so why would I ask them anything when the answer will be negative regardless?
How about you tell how Naruto dropped in quality because you did it once before and turned out all the "flaws" were just as prevelant in One Piece.
I'm done posting here, this discussion is useless since you're too stubborn to acknowledge my points since you're so caught up in trying to prove that Naruto hasn't fallen in quality or the flaws the people accuse Naruto of having, lies in their fav. series as well.
cop out much....