"Then eventually the world will have no need for ninja. A world where they are not needed is the true end-game to peace." - Shikamaru (Hiden)
[...]it's like how the old traditions of samurais in japan were conflicted with the new industrialization, there is something admirable about the old ways even though they seem trivial now.
There are only a few known rules:
I don't remember where he said about disliking these particular rules but really these are pretty basic instructions that mostly need to be followed in all the armed forces( except Jiraiya ones which are moe related with general ethics). What would you changed these rules to?
Your reaction if they ended up just like Naruto and Sasuke...?Pretty sure nothing will change in this upcoming adaption.
Boruto will end Kawaki, or he'll live, happily ever after. Sarada becomes Hokage, Boruto her right hand man.
The end.
This all reminds me of something that was said in the Sengoku Musou anime that I saw not long ago. Whether this line was rooted in historical accuracy I'm not sure, but during one of the episodes, Ieyasu Tokugawa says the following to Tadakatsu Honda;
"[...] In the days to come, Samurai must be able to survive beyond the battlefield. If we truly desire to put an end to warfare, and bring about a peaceful world, we must rid ourselves of our fighting spirit."
And when questioned what a Samurai then should do by Tadakatsu, Ieyasu replies "Administration."
In other words, in order for true lasting peace to happen, the era of the Samurai needs to end, and I suppose that quote from Shikamaru Hiden could be inspired by this quote if it is indeed based on something Ieyasu actually said, at least it sounded similar, just replacing Samurai with Shinobi.
But are the villages still militarized? Naruto is already working with the kages to maintain peace, how would that create a cycle of hatred if there's supposedly no conflict? Are you suggesting some sort of central government uniting the villages? I do agree there needs to be much less emphasis on power when it comes to choosing a leader.
The strongest of all 5 Villages got appointed Hokage for being powerful war heroes, not by being the best at leading or government. Naruto is at least a good mascot for a leader but seems to be inept at the paperwork/balancing of duties, which is why he has Shikamaru- who is essentially the other Hokage, even babysitting Naruto into the Kage seat.
I agreed the leader should not be chosen based on fighting power. Using other criteria to a certain extent would discourage violence and help maintain peace. I was asking about other aspect of the system i.e. village segregation. When Naruto become hokage it doesn't seem to be likely to cause conflict.
Naruto was never an anti-institution person, only a maverick. You're assuming Naruto can arbitrarily decide how every other country is going to operate just because he's a war hero when in reality he's still a grunt for the Fire Lord. They're the ones who ultimately have the political authority to outright dissolve the institution, plus all of the feudal lords throughout the story preferred a powerful person being the village leader so they didn't have to worry about their investment being adequately protected.