And Gaara murdered unarmed people left and right because he was pissed off at his father before his brother, sister and sensei deceived the leaf and killed several of its shinobi with Orochimaru. Your point?
Yeah, by charging at someone who harmed none of them, whom they knew was strong and whom they pissed off. That's not how a military works, at least not a democratic one, which most of the villages follow. The Samurai nation being a neutral country only further supports that because they did not support war or conflict. It is nothing more than paralleling the idiot samurai foot soldiers of the sengoku era who did the same exact thing out of stupidity and arrogance. And a strong, organized and rational militia would examine the enemy first or fallback and acquire more intel before engaging.
In my country, I'd be given a warning and restrained to their prison.
My pardons, but I do not live in North Korea, I live in the United States of American whose government reflects that of most of the shinobi nations. And in all honestly, considering how many people Kim Jong is starving, killing and torturing right now, I wouldn't be surprised if a rebel did show up at his door and the guard just watched as he walked in.
Your government and militia kill people simply for carrying in a place they shouldn't? I'd hate to live where you live. All the same, we are talking about a sword here, not a gun.
Why are we moving on? Do you feel threatened or shaken by my statements? No, we are not moving on because I have validated myself and you have not debunked that, unless of course you are conceding.
I am not your buddy and do not generalize any and every militia when you possess no concept of them and have no idea what you're talking about.
Gaara and the five villages did apparently. He may have brutally and sadistically killed those guys and at the end of the day I still wouldn't have cared much because he warned them not to and they did not take secure measures.
I'd expect there would be no need for a court in your country if police and militia kill on sight for any crime.
It was their choice as well when he warned them not to.
No, it's your personal and hypocritical opinion brought on by your poor upbringing that all women should be physically and emotionally strong.
It's also not his fault that you are hypocritically sexist and believe all women should be as strong as men rather than just themselves.
Useless is subjective. The most powerful character in this manga, Kaguya is a woman who ended a war by herself. The fifth Hokage and fifth Mizukage are women and have both saved countless lives including the main protagonist as well as reformed their villages. Chiyo defeated Sasori and saved Gaara's life and Sakura helped defeat Sasori and saved Chiyo and Naruto's life as well as Kankuro's. Temari defeated Tayuya. Would you like me to go on? Okay. Konan was a member of Akatsuki and almost killed Obito. Hinata and Sakura motivated Naruto. Sakura helped Naruto and Sasuke learn chakra control. Tsunade revolutionized the shinobi by introducing healing members and healing jutsus to squads. Karin saved Sasuke's life, found danzou for him and destroyed the mokuton buddha statue.
Perhaps, perhaps not, but at the end of the day, he warned them not to attack and killed them to defend himself like any human being, which is rational compared to savagely slaughtering them like the Akatsuki would have. In my opinion, a militia shooting to kill one person with a sword with no warning or secure measures for themselves deserves death anyway. A good example lesson in humility for the ones who formed it.
I don't see Gaara being tried for his actions or the sand, mist, cloud or rock. Gaara became the general of the alliance, while his brother and sister became platoon captains and A became commander of the whole alliance. Why? Because they committed deeds and reached a compromise. Sasuke has done the same by helping to defeat Kabuto, releasing edo tensei, bringing back the hokages, saving Naruto's life and helping he and the alliance defeat Obito and Madara, not to mention sealing Orochimaru, releasing his prisoners and killing Deidara.
They all become pardoned by their actions and overlooked by you while for some reason you obsesses over no one else but Sasuke defending himself against an army that attacked him without warning? You sound a bit biased if you ask me and bias and objectivity do not mix.
According to Tobirama, the sharingan influences emotions, thus I will mention it as many times as I wish, thank you.
Itachi is one person, not his whole clan. I never stated it effects all the Uchiha, though you could probably argue that even Itachi was influenced by his considering several of his actions in my opinion were not justified and quite radical.
You are contradicting yourself again on account that you stated Sasuke was rational when the samurai attacked him, not crazy.
But course you will just overlook Itachi's choices as well as other characters' and villages' and continue to obsess over Sasuke, right?
All he did was train. There is no proof that he participated in any of Orochimaru's activities. He didn't even like him, sealed him and released his prisoners in the end.
No, it is not.
It's not a matter of thinking, but knowing.
Links or it didn't happen. And do not use the second movie. That is not canon.
Incorrect. Sasuke stated he abhorred Orochimauru's actions.
I never stated it takes it away, I said it makes up for it. Do not put words into my mouth when you cannot understand mine.
And this is subjective. I believe doing good deeds can make up for bad deeds as has been shown in this manga with Gaara and the sand siblings, the other villages and even several antagonists including Sasori, Nagato, Konan, Obito, Zabuza, Haku, etc.
Warning offenders and defending yourself is not murder.
With all the positive actions they've done in this war, I doubt anyone in this manga will be receiving prison time.